• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

CIA report faults top officials for pre-9/11 lapses

Beowulf

Golden Member
CIA report faults top officials for pre-9/11 lapses



WASHINGTON (AP) -- A report from the CIA's independent investigator is expected to conclude officials at the highest level of the agency are to blame for pre-September 11 intelligence lapses.

The report by the CIA's inspector general, John Helgerson, which is nearly complete, concludes that senior leaders should be held accountable for failing to provide adequate resources for combating terrorism, the New York Times reports in its Friday editions.

Among those who receive the most pointed criticism in a draft version are former CIA Director George Tenet and former Deputy Director of Operations Jim Pavitt, both of whom resigned last summer, the newspaper said. The report quoted current and former intelligence officials.

The report has been reviewed by select government officials. A CIA spokesman declined to comment on the investigation.

A former intelligence official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told The Associated Press that Tenet has reviewed a small portion of the report and was given an opportunity to respond. The official said the report discusses accountability for the attacks of September 11, 2001 -- primarily based on the inspector general's review of a joint House-Senate inquiry into the attacks.

In a statement, former Tenet spokesman Bill Harlow said no one in the U.S. government was more aggressive dealing with the threat of terrorism before 9/11 than Tenet.

"The vast, vast majority of more than two-thirds of the top al-Qaida leaders that have been killed or captured have been taken out through the efforts of George Tenet's CIA," Harlow said.

"Mr. Tenet was correctly characterized by many as 'running around with his hair on fire' prior to 9/11, when others in government -- including Congress and the executive branch -- were downplaying his concerns."

Some in Congress have been eager to see the report released since CIA Director Porter Goss, a former Republican congressman from Florida, took over in September.

West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, wrote Goss in the fall about the report's progress and "the appearance that the inspector general's independence is being infringed."

The agency has said the report is not being stalled, and that Goss is carefully considering how to handle it, including what to do about forming an accountability panel.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOL...a.report.ap/index.html
 
I doubt even this would've stopped the re-election of George W.W.J.D. Bush.
 
I don't think this reflects much on Bush since he didn't appoint Tenet it does reflect on how Tenet and his team were horrible in stopping terrorism.
 
Originally posted by: Beowulf
I don't think this reflects much on Bush since he didn't appoint Tenet it does reflect on how Tenet and his team were horrible in stopping terrorism.

Exactly...the report criticizes the CIA, not Bush

Bush is not the CIA.
 
Originally posted by: Beowulf
I don't think this reflects much on Bush since he didn't appoint Tenet it does reflect on how Tenet and his team were horrible in stopping terrorism.
Perhaps because the CIA had been made the scapegoat for certain situations in the past and they were getting a bit gun-shy?
 
It is about Bush. It's about the kind of administration he runs. Bush ignored intelligence that didn't fit his agenda and manufactured intelligence that did. And it's about Bush because he then chose to bestow the nation's highest honor on Tenet. Now Bush supporters use Tenet as Bush's scapegoat. You can't have it both ways. Either Tenet was incompetent, and that's why Bush made the monumental blunder of invading Iraq on false intelligence, or Bush intentionally degrades the nation's highest honor by handing it out to a documented screw-up whose incompetence has led to the fiasco we are mired in in Iraq.


 
It is about Bush. It's about the kind of administration he runs. Bush ignored intelligence that didn't fit his agenda and manufactured intelligence that did. And it's about Bush because he then chose to bestow the nation's highest honor on Tenet. Now Bush supporters use Tenet as Bush's scapegoat. You can't have it both ways. Either Tenet was incompetent, and that's why Bush made the monumental blunder of invading Iraq on false intelligence, or Bush intentionally degrades the nation's highest honor by handing it out to a documented screw-up whose incompetence has led to the fiasco we are mired in in Iraq.

You need to return to the real world. Intelligence breakdowns occured not only from Bush's administration but Clintons. The Gore commission in 1997 setup the standard for screening and checking bags before getting onto a plane. Yet it failed to stop the terrorists. Overall the FBI and CIA were just not prepared for a post cold-war intelligence world.

I would suggest reading the 9-11 commish report. It will help to alleviate any doubts or misguidings you have on the situation. Which appear to be plenty.

 
Originally posted by: BBond
It is about Bush. It's about the kind of administration he runs. Bush ignored intelligence that didn't fit his agenda and manufactured intelligence that did. And it's about Bush because he then chose to bestow the nation's highest honor on Tenet. Now Bush supporters use Tenet as Bush's scapegoat. You can't have it both ways. Either Tenet was incompetent, and that's why Bush made the monumental blunder of invading Iraq on false intelligence, or Bush intentionally degrades the nation's highest honor by handing it out to a documented screw-up whose incompetence has led to the fiasco we are mired in in Iraq.

Bush didn't bestow the nation's highest honor on Tenet he was appointed by Clinton and no am not bashing Clinton all am saying is he appointed Tenet.Now Tenet did screw up big time thats why he resigned and we have the CIA doing what they need to do in order to succeed.Reading the 9/11 report just shows you how many times Tenet failed but as they say hindsight is always 20/20 now we must work our way out of our errors.Bush would be completely stupid if Tenet was still in the CIA and this report came out but Tenet is not which is good for us.
 
Originally posted by: Beowulf
Originally posted by: BBond
It is about Bush. It's about the kind of administration he runs. Bush ignored intelligence that didn't fit his agenda and manufactured intelligence that did. And it's about Bush because he then chose to bestow the nation's highest honor on Tenet. Now Bush supporters use Tenet as Bush's scapegoat. You can't have it both ways. Either Tenet was incompetent, and that's why Bush made the monumental blunder of invading Iraq on false intelligence, or Bush intentionally degrades the nation's highest honor by handing it out to a documented screw-up whose incompetence has led to the fiasco we are mired in in Iraq.

Bush didn't bestow the nation's highest honor on Tenet he was appointed by Clinton and no am not bashing Clinton all am saying is he appointed Tenet.Now Tenet did screw up big time thats why he resigned and we have the CIA doing what they need to do in order to succeed.Reading the 9/11 report just shows you how many times Tenet failed but as they say hindsight is always 20/20 now we must work our way out of our errors.Bush would be completely stupid if Tenet was still in the CIA and this report came out but Tenet is not which is good for us.

President Bush awarded the nation's highest civilian honor (to Tenet)
He sure did award Tenet the highest honor. Even after pre-911 intelligence failures and pre-Iraq war intelligence failures, GWB gave this man the nation's highest civilan honor.
 
Ok but how does that change who appointed him? I agree that was not a wise thing to do but that in no way changes anything in the past.

 
Originally posted by: chowderhead
Originally posted by: Beowulf
Originally posted by: BBond
It is about Bush. It's about the kind of administration he runs. Bush ignored intelligence that didn't fit his agenda and manufactured intelligence that did. And it's about Bush because he then chose to bestow the nation's highest honor on Tenet. Now Bush supporters use Tenet as Bush's scapegoat. You can't have it both ways. Either Tenet was incompetent, and that's why Bush made the monumental blunder of invading Iraq on false intelligence, or Bush intentionally degrades the nation's highest honor by handing it out to a documented screw-up whose incompetence has led to the fiasco we are mired in in Iraq.

Bush didn't bestow the nation's highest honor on Tenet he was appointed by Clinton and no am not bashing Clinton all am saying is he appointed Tenet.Now Tenet did screw up big time thats why he resigned and we have the CIA doing what they need to do in order to succeed.Reading the 9/11 report just shows you how many times Tenet failed but as they say hindsight is always 20/20 now we must work our way out of our errors.Bush would be completely stupid if Tenet was still in the CIA and this report came out but Tenet is not which is good for us.

President Bush awarded the nation's highest civilian honor (to Tenet)
He sure did award Tenet the highest honor. Even after pre-911 intelligence failures and pre-Iraq war intelligence failures, GWB gave this man the nation's highest civilan honor.


Ahhhh haha I thought the original poster thought Bush appointed Tenet.I didn't even know a nations highest civilian honor existed I can understand Tommy Franks but Tenet heh should have just kicked him in the ass for his crappy job.
 
Back
Top