Chrysler Loans forgiven

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Considering unemployment is higher now than it was six months ago, I wait with bated breath on how Chrysler going bankrupt then would have been a catastrophe but now isn't such a big deal. Other than arguing sentiment (i.e. people were already so panicked, to make it worse would have been dreadful), I don't see any quantifiable justification for that stance.
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,330
1,203
126
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
$7.7 billion to provide 58,000 people with jobs for 6 months???

Maybe we should have closed the company and just sent each employee a check. Might have been cheaper in the long run.

lol, I just ran the calculations, in the numbers that came back : $7.7 billion would give each of the 58,000 $51,061 a WEEK for 6 months. In fact, that's so much damned money, that you could give each employee over $4,400 a month for TEN YEARS.

I know there's overhead, but JFC on a Popsicle stick.

$51061 * 58000 * 26 != $7.7 billion. You must be one of B-Rock's "number crunchers".
 

Budmantom

Lifer
Aug 17, 2002
13,103
1
81
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
I swear Obama is going to start bombing Iran and the libs of this forum will be calling it a stimulus program for the military fully supporting it.

Not far from the truth.
 

ShockwaveVT

Senior member
Dec 13, 2004
830
1
0
Did you guys not see the part about the 8% equity stake that the U.S. Treasury will have in Chrysler?

$7.2 billion for 8% of the company values it at approximately $90 billion overall. Seems a bit high to me, but I'm not really up on my automaker values, perhaps someone else can chime in with Chrysler's market cap or asset valuation.
 

sactoking

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2007
7,525
2,727
136
Originally posted by: ShockwaveVT
Did you guys not see the part about the 8% equity stake that the U.S. Treasury will have in Chrysler?

$7.2 billion for 8% of the company values it at approximately $90 billion overall. Seems a bit high to me, but I'm not really up on my automaker values, perhaps someone else can chime in with Chrysler's market cap or asset valuation.

Not 100% sure, but maybe 95% sure that's not publicly known at this point. Chrysler is a closely-held corporation and not subject to public disclosures.

As a comparison, GM on 12/31/08 had a balance sheet deficit of $86,154,000,000 and market cap of $2.16 billion. I highly doubt Chrysler is worth 41.67 x GM (in terms of market cap) even in GM's current state.
 

evident

Lifer
Apr 5, 2005
11,904
508
126
thank you fucking chrysler supporters who were for it. never buying gm/chrysler ever.
 

Budmantom

Lifer
Aug 17, 2002
13,103
1
81
Originally posted by: evident
thank you fucking chrysler supporters who were for it. never buying gm/chrysler ever.


What the hell is wrong with you, Obama motors makes some of the greenest vehicles around, these are American brands brought to you and backed by the current administration and paid for by your tax dollars.


 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,227
36
91
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: evident
thank you fucking chrysler supporters who were for it. never buying gm/chrysler ever.


What the hell is wrong with you, Obama motors makes some of the greenest vehicles around, these are American brands brought to you and backed by the current administration and paid for by your tax dollars.

Somewhere, Hugo Chavez is smiling right now.
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,511
1
81
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Saga
I really wish some of this government spending would finally go to the people directly and not through proxy.

You want direct democracy? That's an awful idea. There's a reason why no country on earth does it that way.

Fail at reading comprehension. He said the money should go to the people, ie the citizens, not to the companies.

It's a real easy concept. People have money, people spend money, company gets money when people spend it to buy said companies products. Everyone wins.
 

Budmantom

Lifer
Aug 17, 2002
13,103
1
81
Originally posted by: OCguy
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: evident
thank you fucking chrysler supporters who were for it. never buying gm/chrysler ever.


What the hell is wrong with you, Obama motors makes some of the greenest vehicles around, these are American brands brought to you and backed by the current administration and paid for by your tax dollars.

Somewhere, Hugo Chavez is smiling right now.


Master & Grasshopper
 

evident

Lifer
Apr 5, 2005
11,904
508
126
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: evident
thank you fucking chrysler supporters who were for it. never buying gm/chrysler ever.


What the hell is wrong with you, Obama motors makes some of the greenest vehicles around, these are American brands brought to you and backed by the current administration and paid for by your tax dollars.

its not obama or bush, its all these idiots who have stupid nostalgia for american cars from the 60s who can't think about the big picture, who think you're a terrorist if you dont drive these shit cars.
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
$7.7 billion to provide 58,000 people with jobs for 6 months???

Maybe we should have closed the company and just sent each employee a check. Might have been cheaper in the long run.

lol, I just ran the calculations, in the numbers that came back : $7.7 billion would give each of the 58,000 $51,061 a WEEK for 6 months. In fact, that's so much damned money, that you could give each employee over $4,400 a month for TEN YEARS.

I know there's overhead, but JFC on a Popsicle stick.

your numbers are high by a factor of 10. you did 77 billion instead of 7.7.
 

Andrew1990

Banned
Mar 8, 2008
2,155
0
0
Time for me to start a fake, I mean "real", auto company. Then I can ask for a Bailout for 100M and live off of it for years.


Thank You to the current administration for the job well done. I am sure that there was nowhere else this money could have went. Except maybe sending the current administration to a University to learn some common sense....
 

zephyrprime

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2001
7,512
2
81
Yeah, this stuff really stinks. If we just took the billions of dollars and put it into a new venture firm owned by the gov, they could probably buy up chrysler's usefull assets for that much money and start a new card company completely unhindered by the bad management and union of the current chrysler. That'd probably be more economically effective.
 

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,890
642
126
It's going to get worse. My guess is that the bankruptcy will be completed and Fiat will sell off what's left at bargain prices and head home. Seeing how they have next to nothing in this deal, it will pretty much be pure profit.

It's kind of ironic that a major mistake by GM is in a sense helping fund the Fiat acquisitions. For those that don't know, GM bought an option to buy Fiat, then at the eleventh hour decided to pass. The contract between them obligated GM to pony up $2 Billion. Which they did.
 

thegimp03

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2004
7,426
2
81
Originally posted by: ShockwaveVT
Did you guys not see the part about the 8% equity stake that the U.S. Treasury will have in Chrysler?

$7.2 billion for 8% of the company values it at approximately $90 billion overall. Seems a bit high to me, but I'm not really up on my automaker values, perhaps someone else can chime in with Chrysler's market cap or asset valuation.

Yeah no kidding it's high. Daimler paid $36 billion for Chrysler 10 years ago and the company is even shittier now.
 

cumhail

Senior member
Apr 1, 2003
682
0
0
What might be amusing, if it weren't so damned disgusting, is that some of the same people who were arguing that the bailouts were necessary because we cannot allow the US auto industry to fail are now the loudest in condemning them.
 

Ktulu

Diamond Member
Dec 16, 2000
4,354
0
0
Originally posted by: evident
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: evident
thank you fucking chrysler supporters who were for it. never buying gm/chrysler ever.


What the hell is wrong with you, Obama motors makes some of the greenest vehicles around, these are American brands brought to you and backed by the current administration and paid for by your tax dollars.

its not obama or bush, its all these idiots who have stupid nostalgia for american cars from the 60s who can't think about the big picture, who think you're a terrorist if you dont drive these shit cars.


Funny that you're mentioning people being stuck in the 60's, you seem to be stuck in the 80's/90's as are most people unfortunately. The domestics have made gigantic improvements in quality, reliability, fuel economy and styling in the past 5 years or so. Although i'm afraid it might be too little too late.
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
Originally posted by: thegimp03
Originally posted by: ShockwaveVT
Did you guys not see the part about the 8% equity stake that the U.S. Treasury will have in Chrysler?

$7.2 billion for 8% of the company values it at approximately $90 billion overall. Seems a bit high to me, but I'm not really up on my automaker values, perhaps someone else can chime in with Chrysler's market cap or asset valuation.

Yeah no kidding it's high. Daimler paid $36 billion for Chrysler 10 years ago and the company is even shittier now.

do we know how much Diamler sold Chrysler/dodge for?

btw who didn't think the word "loan" was a PC way of saying "Grant?" no one really thought we get that money back I hope.
 

TheSlamma

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
7,625
5
81
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
7 billion was worth not having chrysler go bankrupt 6 months ago.

Why cause we really need Durango's? 300's? PT Cruisers? what other useless junk do we need that only helps out short men who can't afford the step up to a euro phallic symbol?