- May 19, 2011
- 19,901
- 14,131
- 136
Please correct me if I'm wrong:
AFAIK, Chromebooks are designed to store user data in the cloud. They store it locally too (where possible) but with a view to sync'ing with the user's Google account. If someone has >15GB of photos, they can't just be stored locally, so therefore the user would need to be paying Google for extra cloud storage (as Google charges for more than 15GB of user data in a Google account).
I imagine that one can get around the "can't be stored locally" rule by say storing the photos on USB/MicroSD, but that complicates matters enough that the user needs to be sufficiently competent to handle and back up their data with confidence.
AFAIK, Chromebooks are designed to store user data in the cloud. They store it locally too (where possible) but with a view to sync'ing with the user's Google account. If someone has >15GB of photos, they can't just be stored locally, so therefore the user would need to be paying Google for extra cloud storage (as Google charges for more than 15GB of user data in a Google account).
I imagine that one can get around the "can't be stored locally" rule by say storing the photos on USB/MicroSD, but that complicates matters enough that the user needs to be sufficiently competent to handle and back up their data with confidence.