Here you go
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?p=37393311#post37393311
It started with the secular thing, and then you went on and on
Ok, so yes, you are confused as to what went on.
I said.
The US started its society as mainly secular. While the founding fathers believed in a god, they wanted to set up a government that was agnostic
You took that statement to mean that the government was set up as agnostic instead of secular. My statement was that the government was set up to believe both things.
Then I said.
The laws passed are secular, and the view on religion from the perspective of the state is agnostic.
Your response was that I had described it earlier incorrectly, but I did not, because I never described anything. But, its true that the US was mainly secular in the laws passed, but the founding fathers were still theists, so mainly secular is accurate in describing the government they set up originally. They included at the date section of the constitution "year of our lord", because religion was so intertwined in society. So, the state was both agnostic and secular. I dont know why you thought I was saying something mutually exclusive, but I was not, so that was a misunderstanding on your end.
As for me going on and on, again, that is not true.
You questioned me on post 429.
I responded in post 430 saying it was late and I would explain more in the morning. Nothing long there.
I then responded in post 443 saying to look up a few key figures who worked on the founding of the nation. Again, short.
You responded in post 444 with...
Then all the way in post 461, I made the statement that better explained so you could understand.
I dont think you understand the words being used.
The laws passed are secular, and the view on religion from the perspective of the state is agnostic.
Are you having trouble understanding that?
So where was the going on and on part.
Lets recap.
I made an accurate claim on the religious nature of the US being secular and agnostic.
I made the claim that Muslims make up a disproportionate number of religious terrorists.
I made the claim the US could defeat any country in the world if it were to attack their military.
You are disputed all of those, even though they are objective and empirical.