• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Christians Attacked In Michigan!

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
busydude said:
Don't spend much time analyzing his posts. Just keep in mind the fact that he considers anyone that is not Hindu to be an untouchable.
Click to expand...

not just non-Hindus.. even Hindus who don't lead a sattvic lifestyle are considered mlecchas according to saStrAs.. so analysis fail on your part..
 
Last edited:
Pulsar said:
Deaborn Michigan a community of Arabic / Muslim / etc. This was an Arab/Muslim/Indian festival. They are the majority. You have no clue what you're talking about.
Click to expand...

How is that an "Indian" festival? Spoken like a true ameriCUNT - ignorant of 3rd grade geography..
 
Pulsar said:
There are also a large number of Indians who live in the area and attend the festival.
Click to expand...

well.. I don't live in Dearborn so I'm not sure of what their Indian population is like. from what I've heard/read, it is a stronghold of arabs.. perhaps the largest arab population in the US... if there are any Indians there.. they are all muslims..

where is the evidence that there were any Indians there at all?
 
Last edited:
Baasha said:
well.. I don't live in Dearborn so I'm not sure of what their Indian population is like. from what I've heard/read, it is a stronghold of arabs.. perhaps the largest arab population in the US... if there are any Indians there.. they are all muslims..
Click to expand...

You don't live there..... but you know any Indians who do must be muslim.

That's great. Really.

Tell us about class purity again. It really helps your credibility.
 
Pulsar said:
You don't live there..... but you know any Indians who do must be muslim.

That's great. Really.

Tell us about class purity again. It really helps your credibility.
Click to expand...

Do you live there? how many Indians do you know there? it's a wild assumption on your part.. "great" indeed 🙄

It's CASTE purity. not class.. perhaps you should learn to read..
 
If you had bothered to read this thread, you'd know I do live there. Or at least, close enough to it that there's really no difference. But no worries - I'm the one who clearly needs to learn to read.

But don't let me stop you. You're on a roll. What a troll.

Caste. Cast. Class. It's all bigotry and elitism and the sign of a truly sick culture. Call it whatever you want.
 
Last edited:
Pulsar said:
If you had bothered to read this thread, you'd know I do live there. Or at least, close enough to it that there's really no difference. But no worries - I'm the one who clearly needs to learn to read.

But don't let me stop you. You're on a roll. What a troll.

Caste. Cast. Class. It's all bigotry and elitism and the sign of a truly sick culture. Call it whatever you want.
Click to expand...

equating caste and class is as bright as equating Indians and arabs/muslims..

so learned.. must be that 4th grade edumacation..
 
Baasha said:
Do you live there? how many Indians do you know there? it's a wild assumption on your part.. "great" indeed 🙄

It's CASTE purity. not class.. perhaps you should learn to read..
Click to expand...

You are remarkably discourteous and your car site is horrible. It's not 1999 - people expect content.
 
SagaLore said:
WTF? OP thinks this was peaceful?

In that case, the KKK burning crosses in black families' front yards is considered "peaceful".
Click to expand...

It was peaceful, the Christians didn't attack muslims, so just because muslims cant handle the criticism and get violent doesn't justify there actions, brings new meaning to the religion of peace
 
Incorruptible said:
It was peaceful, the Christians didn't attack muslims, so just because muslims cant handle the criticism and get violent doesn't justify there actions, brings new meaning to the religion of peace
Click to expand...

Walking around with a pig head and shouting at them that Allah is not god is an attack. That is not a protest. That is assault.


Religion of love slapping the religion of peace. Both sides are awful.
 
SagaLore said:
Walking around with a pig head and shouting at them that Allah is not god is an attack. That is not a protest. That is assault.


Religion of love slapping the religion of peace. Both sides are awful.
Click to expand...

Unless the Christians actually attacked or used force against the muslims then the muslims were still wrong for attacking them.

If the Christians had hit the muslims then the muslims would be ok to defend themselves but that's not what happened, under freedom of speech people have the right to criticize any religion
 
Incorruptible said:
Unless the Christians actually attacked or used force against the muslims then the muslims were still wrong for attacking them.

If the Christians had hit the muslims then the muslims would be ok to defend themselves but that's not what happened, under freedom of speech people have the right to criticize any religion
Click to expand...

I don't think freedom of speech means what you think it means. The 1st amendment guarantees that the GOVERNMENT won't limit your right to say what you want. If you're being a jackass and someone punches you in the face, he's not violating your freedom of speech rights, he's just attacking you. That attack may be unlawful, but it isn't a freedom of speech issue.
 
Rainsford said:
I don't think freedom of speech means what you think it means. The 1st amendment guarantees that the GOVERNMENT won't limit your right to say what you want. If you're being a jackass and someone punches you in the face, he's not violating your freedom of speech rights, he's just attacking you. That attack may be unlawful, but it isn't a freedom of speech issue.
Click to expand...


Technically they are still using force against you though, they are committing assault against you so freedom is being violated.

I still believe it is a freedom of speech issue because many Christians have there religion insulted yet dont resort to violence, many of these people justify violence if you say anything bad about there religion of peace😕.

The people attacking Christians should be charged and arrested

These kind of incidents are only going to get worse and more common unless we take a stand
 
Oh... u mean those angry little Christian Chaldean and Christian Lebanese kids? Why do you have issues with non white Cristian kids?
 
Incorruptible said:
Technically they are still using force against you though, they are committing assault against you so freedom is being violated.

I still believe it is a freedom of speech issue because many Christians have there religion insulted yet dont resort to violence, many of these people justify violence if you say anything bad about there religion of peace😕.
Click to expand...
I don't know if I've ever heard a story where a group of non-Christians verbally baited a group of Christians like what happened in this case with Muslims. For that matter, our country as a whole has MUCH more negative things to say about Islam than Christianity. Anyone who thinks Christians in America face the same negative attitude as Muslims in America is clearly not paying very much attention.

That doesn't mean it's legally acceptable to attack someone who's being a douche about your religion, but I think the idea that Christianity is being oppressed, in general or in this particular case, is incredibly ridiculous.
The people attacking Christians should be charged and arrested

These kind of incidents are only going to get worse and more common unless we take a stand
Click to expand...

I agree that attacking people (Christian or otherwise) isn't OK, and doing so should result in APPROPRIATE charges. But I don't quite understand the portrayal of this story as shocking, specific to Islam, or (most ridiculously) an example of a broader trend. I suspect it wouldn't be at all hard to get a similar reaction by verbally taunting many different groups of people. If we hear about it when Muslims are involved, maybe it's because people DO go after them this way while nobody runs around a gun show calling everyone an "overcompensating closet case".
 
If this was the other way around then there would be outrage and the media would be crying "islamophobia" and how bad Christians are

People you must be honest and realize there are double standards
 
No... it wouldn't. It didn't even make the local news because everyone knows not all brown skinned kids are dirty muslims. As pointed out to you repeatedly many of these kids were Chritians and/or gadp.. WHITE. You must be honest.. you are a bigot.
 
Incorruptible said:
If this was the other way around then there would be outrage and the media would be crying "islamophobia" and how bad Christians are

People you must be honest and realize there are double standards
Click to expand...

I'm sure double standards exist in the world. But every single time I hear someone complaining about double standards, they're comparing hypothetical situations against a situation that DID actually happen. And, as in this case, the person doing the complaining is taking EXACTLY the same position they're opposed to other people taking in the hypothetical situation.

In other words, you're complaining about double standards with the media taking the side of hypothetical Muslim "protesters" in a similar situation, something that has never happened as far as I know, while you spent several pages taking the side of completely real Christian "protesters". I'm only seeing one double standard here, to be perfectly honest...

Problems with complaining about theoretical behavior aside, I feel like you're dramatically misjudging public/media reaction to Muslim activities. When building a community center in Manhattan is widely labeled as building a "9/11 ground zero victory Mosque", I somehow doubt public reaction would favor the Muslims in your hypothetical scenario of Muslims jackwagons disrupting a Christian festival.
 
ch33zw1z said:
Every single person involved in this incident is a douchebag. Damn you religion.
Click to expand...

Blaming religion for this is like blaming rain for the failure of a badly designed and imporperly maintained dam failing. It is the idiots who abuse religion that are at fault...at least wrt these two religions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top