• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Christians Attacked In Michigan!

Page 28 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Incorruptible said:
I dont hate muslims
Click to expand...



n4fd625ce11146.jpg
 
Incorruptible said:
Are you at least able to provide some kind of evidence?
Click to expand...

You mean other than your posting history that is comprised of nothing but anti Muslim statements that make broad sweeping, generalized and almost entirely unsupported claims that try to lump all Muslims into one category based on random actions of a few or, quite often, just based on what you know to be the truth?
 
MomentsofSanity said:
You mean other than your posting history that is comprised of nothing but anti Muslim statements that make broad sweeping, generalized and almost entirely unsupported claims that try to lump all Muslims into one category based on random actions of a few or, quite often, just based on what you know to be the truth?
Click to expand...

I never made broad sweeping claims. I bring up incidents of radical muslims and you guys defend them
 
MomentsofSanity said:
No, you don't. You bring up the actions of a couple of people and apply them to every musllim in the country, region, world. There are substantial examples of this in your posting history.
Click to expand...

Yes I brought up those actions, I admit that since I will do this, BUT I NEVER SAID ALL MUSLIMS WERE LIKE THIS
 
Incorruptible said:
Yes I brought up those actions, I admit that since I will do this, BUT I NEVER SAID ALL MUSLIMS WERE LIKE THIS
Click to expand...

You've also never said you don't like the taste of horse cock. So am I safe to assume you do?

It's all about history of your posts. Thread after thread, post after post of anti Muslim sentiment. You use single localized incidents and expand it to mean everything. Entire country policies. When confronted with exact occurrences from other religions or groups you dismiss those since the thread isn't about that religion. Completely ignoring the point that every group has bad actors. Don't mean those bad actors are every group.

Then you jump to your broad generalizations based on your truths that you know. You never support anything with proof even though you've been confronted to do so many many times. You just ignore them and keep going.

As for your love of horse cock, well, you haven't posted anything pro equine genitalia so I presume you have no opinion on the subject. I could be wrong though, I don't frequent equestrian forums.
 
alzan said:
The tin foil comment? Hardly an insult.

Okay, pick a symbol for me then. Pick a symbol that would repulse Christians in the same way a pig's head repulses Muslims and answer the question.
Click to expand...

The tin foil comment wasn't an insult

If you had a symbol that stated Jesus was gay, its free speech but you shouldn't do it even though you have the right to.

Why is it you defend the muslim extremists but not Christians? If this was the other way you would totally support the muslim extremists for having free speech/
 
Incorruptible said:
If you had a symbol that stated Jesus was gay, its free speech but you shouldn't do it even though you have the right to.
Click to expand...

Why shouldn't I do it?

I would be doing exactly the same thing that the 'protesters' were doing.
Stirring the crowd, hoping for a negative reaction, one that they got.

So can I show up at your church next Sunday with a bunch of signs with rainbow crosses, or a cross inside of a pink triangle and bunch of burly guys dressed in leather chaps hanging all over eachother and expect to be invited inside?
 
Last edited:
CrackRabbit said:
Why shouldn't I do it?

I would be doing exactly the same thing that the 'protesters' were doing.
Stirring the crowd, hoping for a negative reaction, one that they got.

So can I show up at your church next Sunday with a bunch of signs with rainbow crosses, or a cross inside of a pink triangle and bunch of burly guys dressed in leather chaps hanging all over eachother and expect to be invited inside?
Click to expand...

Thats up to the Church if they want you in, and denying you entry inside wouldn't be shutting down freedom of speech
 
Incorruptible said:
The tin foil comment wasn't an insult

If you had a symbol that stated Jesus was gay, its free speech but you shouldn't do it even though you have the right to.

Why is it you defend the muslim extremists but not Christians? If this was the other way you would totally support the muslim extremists for having free speech/
Click to expand...

Now that you have an appropriate symbol, lets get on to the next part of the question. I now have a symbol that would repulse Christians along with signs that have some choice words. So if I were go to a Christian festival with signs and symbol in hand, shouting more repulsive things at the Christians; do you agree that a small percentage of the Christians that can hear me/see the signs and symbol, would be angry and would throw things at me.

And if you agree that that would happen; would you support me the same as you're supporting Ruben Israel and his group?

As I've already stated, I would not support Muslim extremists if they did what I proposed in the example. They would be inciting violence or riot.
 
alzan said:
Now that you have an appropriate symbol, lets get on to the next part of the question. I now have a symbol that would repulse Christians along with signs that have some choice words. So if I were go to a Christian festival with signs and symbol in hand, shouting more repulsive things at the Christians; do you agree that a small percentage of the Christians that can hear me/see the signs and symbol, would be angry and would throw things at me.

And if you agree that that would happen; would you support me the same as you're supporting Ruben Israel and his group?

Yes I would support your RIGHT but not you, That is FREEDOM OF SPEECH, NOT INCITING A RIOT

As I've already stated, I would not support Muslim extremists if they did what I proposed in the example. They would be inciting violence or riot.
Click to expand...

I still haven't heard you condemn the actions of the muslim extremists along with the brutal honor killing of Jessica Mokdad.
 
Incorruptible said:
I still haven't heard you condemn the actions of the muslim extremists along with the brutal honor killing of Jessica Mokdad.
Click to expand...

One at a time, you have to completely answer my question. Do you agree that some Christians would throw things at me for displaying the signs and the repulsive symbol.
 
Incorruptible said:
I dont know but it could happen that they would throw things at you
Click to expand...

So you agree that it's probable that they would throw things at me.

So if they did then I would be the "innocent protester" (the "Ruben Israel" in this example) just exercising my freedom of speech, while the festival attendees who chose to throw things at me would be the ones who were incited to violence by my signs of "protest" and my reviled symbol.

So, given that I've incited some of the Christians to violence would you still defend me and decry those who threw things at me?
 
alzan said:
So you agree that it's probable that they would throw things at me.
Click to expand...

How did you come up with "agree it is probable" when he said " I dont know but it could happen"?

The two are not even closely related and you did not mention probable in your question to him.
 
alzan said:
So you agree that it's probable that they would throw things at me.

So if they did then I would be the "innocent protester" (the "Ruben Israel" in this example) just exercising my freedom of speech, while the festival attendees who chose to throw things at me would be the ones who were incited to violence by my signs of "protest" and my reviled symbol.

So, given that I've incited some of the Christians to violence would you still defend me and decry those who threw things at me?
Click to expand...

They wouldn't be incited, they cant handle criticism. You haven't incited Christians because you used freedom of speech, yes you still have the right and it should be protected

Now are you going to say its alright for what the Christians did, or are you a just a man of double standards
 
Incorruptible said:
They wouldn't be incited, they cant handle criticism. You haven't incited Christians because you used freedom of speech, yes you still have the right and it should be protected

Now are you going to say its alright for what the Christians did, or are you a just a man of double standards
Click to expand...

You said it could happen, IOW it has a possibility/probability of happening. Take it a step further and deduce that out of the hundreds that would hear me or see the signs that a small percentage would throw things at me.

I'll wait while you think that through.
 
alzan said:
You said it could happen, IOW it has a possibility/probability of happening. Take it a step further and deduce that out of the hundreds that would hear me or see the signs that a small percentage would throw things at me.

I'll wait while you think that through.
Click to expand...

I already stated that you could get attacked what else do you want?

You think its ok for you to do your nonsense but you think the Christians are wrong
 
Incorruptible said:
I already stated that you could get attacked what else do you want?

You think its ok for you to do your nonsense but you think the Christians are wrong
Click to expand...

Of course it's not okay for me to do what I stated in my example. My nonsense is the exact same thing the "Christians" did. Ruben Israel and his group incited violence; my hypothetical actions would also incite violence, as agreed by you.

Ruben Israel and his group were wrong for what they did and I would be wrong if I performed the actions in my example in front of Christians.

So after that long tortuous journey spanning several pages you finally agree that Israel and his group were wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top