• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Christian Polling Group Finds Atheists Divorce Less Than Christians

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
It's atheists who are always attacking Christians for no reasons and they leave Islam alone. Why the hypocrisy?

Have I ever admitted to being Christian?

shehateme is one of the most intolerant posters here. I have owned her numerous times which is why she takes these cheapshots.

It's actually pretty rare for atheists to attack Christians without provocation, even on here. Attacks against Christians from atheists usually come in response to Christians trying to force their religious beliefs into laws. And seeing as followers of Islam hold almost no political power in the US (where most posters on here are from), there's little opportunity to attack. You don't see atheists attacing Christians as violent every time a single Christian commits a violent act, you often get Christians attacking the entirety of Islam when a single Muslim commits a violent act.

I don't know if you've ever used the phrase "I am a Christian" on here. But you've defended every horrible thing said or done by Christians that comes up as if Christians can do no wrong. It is clear you are a Christian who believes all Christians are automatically perfect. You are both wrong in that assessment, and thankfully for most Christians you are a horrible example of Christianity.

You have never owned anyone on this forum. Not shehateme, not anyone. Ever. Not once. You are the forum joke.
 
My guess is that atheists tend to be more educated and affluent. This demographic typically has the lowest divorce and crime rate.
 
No, that's stupid.



Anyway, I predicted the future. Didn't take long for the Calvary to show up.

Exactly, so is intolerance...stupid. You were correct about your favorite opponent though. Oh and thanks for acknowledging only part of my response.
 
Last edited:
Incorruptible, you said "have I ADMITTED to be being a Christian"... not "have I CLAIMED to be a Christian".

The former indicates you're hiding it, the latter indicates that you aren't.

Just sayin'..
 
It's actually pretty rare for atheists to attack Christians without provocation, even on here. Attacks against Christians from atheists usually come in response to Christians trying to force their religious beliefs into laws. And seeing as followers of Islam hold almost no political power in the US (where most posters on here are from), there's little opportunity to attack. You don't see atheists attacing Christians as violent every time a single Christian commits a violent act, you often get Christians attacking the entirety of Islam when a single Muslim commits a violent act.

I don't know if you've ever used the phrase "I am a Christian" on here. But you've defended every horrible thing said or done by Christians that comes up as if Christians can do no wrong. It is clear you are a Christian who believes all Christians are automatically perfect. You are both wrong in that assessment, and thankfully for most Christians you are a horrible example of Christianity.

You have never owned anyone on this forum. Not shehateme, not anyone. Ever. Not once. You are the forum joke.

So.....atheists have the victim complex?
 
It's actually pretty rare for atheists to attack Christians without provocation, even on here. Attacks against Christians from atheists usually come in response to Christians trying to force their religious beliefs into laws. And seeing as followers of Islam hold almost no political power in the US (where most posters on here are from), there's little opportunity to attack. You don't see atheists attacing Christians as violent every time a single Christian commits a violent act, you often get Christians attacking the entirety of Islam when a single Muslim commits a violent act.

I don't know if you've ever used the phrase "I am a Christian" on here. But you've defended every horrible thing said or done by Christians that comes up as if Christians can do no wrong. It is clear you are a Christian who believes all Christians are automatically perfect. You are both wrong in that assessment, and thankfully for most Christians you are a horrible example of Christianity.

You have never owned anyone on this forum. Not shehateme, not anyone. Ever. Not once. You are the forum joke.

What? Atheists are always attacking Christians, just look at this thread.

Elements of the MB are linked with obama and the WhiteHouse.

I haven't defended every horrible thing done by Christians and you're lying.

I have owned plenty of people on here.
 
A shitload is a large amount of people but most assuredly not all religious folks. Tell me which crowd is better without showing intolerance: religious or atheists?

If someone doesn't agree with same sex marriage (even an atheist); then what? Are they wrong just because you say so?

Think about it...
I think you have intolerance and disagreement mixed up, it's not the same thing.

I wasn't saying anything for or against SSM, I'm merely pointing out that one of many arguments made by religious people is false according to this study.

but if someone is against SSM I would think they are wrong because they can show me no empirical evidence to support their opinion.
 
shehateme is one of the most intolerant posters here. I have owned her numerous times which is why she takes these cheapshots.

Please post proof.



I'm begging you.


I don't think you've ever "owned" a single poster on AT. Maybe in your bizzaro world...but not in reality.



Exactly, so is intolerance...stupid. You were correct about your favorite opponent though. Oh and thanks for acknowledging only part of my response.

I read what you had to say. I just shortened my response because I am at work. I will address your entire post when I get home. I promise.
 
Last edited:
More to the point, Christians that I know don't expect a lack of trouble and never have.

Shouldn't try to make a serious point in a troll thread, but the downside of being human and having standards where sex is at once a commitment and a biological imperative, young people who are Christians see marriage as a free ticket to sex without consequences. They then are liable to pick poor choices for lifemates and eventually things just fall apart. There's some advantage in "try before you buy."


Ditto.

To add, though, they do attempt to hold themselves to higher moral standards, but in fairness, many non-believers and atheists hold Christians to standards they wouldn't hold themselves to... so in essence, they love linking to these studies to try and castigae all believers.

If they want to link to stuff like this, show me an atheist who has NEVER committed a crime, NEVER divorced, NEVER used drugs, never been arrested.

The same can really be said about white collar crime and violent crimes. Most white collar corruption and fraud, tax-evasion, child porn etc, are perpetrated by whites in America. Does that mean whites are inherently bad, or being black is an honest way of life, or better alternative?

Likewise, if I live in city where violent crimes are committed by blacks, does that mean that by being black, you're likely to be violent by default and being white is, by default, is a better alternative?

Correlation doesn't equal causation.
 
The Church of Earl

We start out Mass with this song

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9PoUsRibtE

And do the sign of the cross with the pointing to the head the tummy and then clap.

Everyone is appointed Pope and gets a cool pointy cap

Then chill with the multiplayer game of the day with munchies and assorted treats for the rest of day

KDS2SKc.jpg


Best player gets a game pick off steam
 
Please post proof.



I'm begging you.


I don't think you've ever "owned" a single poster on AT. Maybe in your bizzaro world...but not in reality.





I read what you had to say. I just shortened my response because I am at work. I will address your entire post when I get home. I promise.

Get to work!
 
I think you have intolerance and disagreement mixed up, it's not the same thing.

I wasn't saying anything for or against SSM, I'm merely pointing out that one of many arguments made by religious people is false according to this study.

but if someone is against SSM I would think they are wrong because they can show me no empirical evidence to support their opinion.

In my opinion, the two words are intertwined in regards to the subject be discussed. For instance, If one were to disagree about SSM they may be labeled intolerant by another or the opposite stance could be defined the same way. Also, you'll find no empirical evidence to support someone for SSM either.
 
Considering you seem to believe that saying "happy holidays" instead of "merry Christmas" is an attack on Christianity, you do not get to say that anyone else has a victim complex.

Considering you're alright with attacking Christians, you don't get to say that anyone else has a victim complex.
 
The Church of Earl

We start out Mass with this song

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9PoUsRibtE

And do the sign of the cross with the pointing to the head the tummy and then clap.

Everyone is appointed Pope and gets a cool pointy cap

Then chill with the multiplayer game of the day with munchies and assorted treats for the rest of day

KDS2SKc.jpg


Best player gets a game pick off steam

Case in point....although somewhat funny and definitely weird as fuck.
 
Last edited:
How in the world did you get that out of my post?

Just wondering....

Not only do they attack unprovoked ( as evident by the OP), they are very judgmental.

How many times do we hear, "believing in god is like believing in the celestial teapot", or "they're abusing their children with religious teaching"? They're basically saying religious people are stupid. A lot of this is clearly unprovoked. They also say that as if God doesn't exists for a certainty, which by defintion is only a belief.

Please, they aren't any better....

This world would be lot better off without religious extremism and atheist superiority. Both are cancers to society.
 
Last edited:
I'm no genius like yourself but usually the divorce rate is calculated by only using people who are/where married.

But that's just my non religious thinking, my guess is your religiousness allows for a special type of logical thinking.

Thanks for the laugh.
 
Just wondering....

Not only do they attack unprovoked ( as evident by the OP), they are very judgmental.

How many times do we hear, "believing in god is like believing in the celestial teapot", or "they're abusing their children with religious teaching"? They're basically saying religious people are stupid. A lot of this is clearly unprovoked.

Please, they aren't any better....

This world would be lot better off without religious extremism and atheist superiority. Both are cancers to society.

This, this has been my point all along. Whichever way the opinion goes it's intolerant....period.
 
This, this has been my point all along. Whichever way the opinion goes it's intolerant....period.

Yep.

Didn't someone mention that "Atheists are more educated and more affluent"?

I'm too lazy, and should be working right now, to see if that was in the link or in this thread.

Anyway, this kind of superiority complex only breeds intolerance as well. Christians are also this way in many cases condeming non-believers to hell, also breeding intolerance to other views.

Its a human condition.
 
Back
Top