divinemartyr
Platinum Member
- Oct 18, 2000
- 2,439
- 1
- 71
jdwright:
Very simple solution for you. Most DSL providers, well I shouldn't say most, but SOME have contracts and install costs. Most cable companies have NO contracts at all and free installation. What harm could it do to try cable out and see how you like it? Then if you don't just cancel and get DSL. Very simple solution to a somewhat difficult problem. I have a cable connection here in a neighborhood that it seems to be pretty prominent in and it is not uncommon for me to get 200k/s downloads. I've had some upwards of 350k/s. Incredibly fast downloads although 128kbits up is slow. If you don't plan to do any uploading, and want something cost effective, regardless of how many people have it in your area, go with cable. Cable limits the number of users per node in good networks, and this should not be an issue at all. Shared bandwidth problems were EARLY cable modem problems. Try it and see what you think, I've had both and prefer cable.
divinemartyr
Very simple solution for you. Most DSL providers, well I shouldn't say most, but SOME have contracts and install costs. Most cable companies have NO contracts at all and free installation. What harm could it do to try cable out and see how you like it? Then if you don't just cancel and get DSL. Very simple solution to a somewhat difficult problem. I have a cable connection here in a neighborhood that it seems to be pretty prominent in and it is not uncommon for me to get 200k/s downloads. I've had some upwards of 350k/s. Incredibly fast downloads although 128kbits up is slow. If you don't plan to do any uploading, and want something cost effective, regardless of how many people have it in your area, go with cable. Cable limits the number of users per node in good networks, and this should not be an issue at all. Shared bandwidth problems were EARLY cable modem problems. Try it and see what you think, I've had both and prefer cable.
divinemartyr
