I'm selling my Canon 55-250 IS soon, with the intention of upgrading to an f/2.8 telephoto. I have a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8, so I am looking for a lens that will complement it and give me more reach.
I'm currently looking at the Tokina 50-135mm f/2.8 and Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L non-IS. Obviously, there is a pretty big gap between these two lenses. I am not really considering the Sigma 50-150 f/2.8 or 70-200 f/2.8 right now because ALL of the Sigma lenses I've owned in the past had AF accuracy issues.
Some intended uses would be sports and portraiture. Should I go for the 50-135 Tokina or spend more for the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L? I shoot a 40D.
Also, how well does the Canon 70-200 AF with a 1.4x TC attached?
I'm currently looking at the Tokina 50-135mm f/2.8 and Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L non-IS. Obviously, there is a pretty big gap between these two lenses. I am not really considering the Sigma 50-150 f/2.8 or 70-200 f/2.8 right now because ALL of the Sigma lenses I've owned in the past had AF accuracy issues.
Some intended uses would be sports and portraiture. Should I go for the 50-135 Tokina or spend more for the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L? I shoot a 40D.
Also, how well does the Canon 70-200 AF with a 1.4x TC attached?