They need to be concerned with bringing their social and political structure into the 20th damn century and not haggling with the US on principle over the "buyout" price of their 7 foot tall national treasure.
it's the same concept with any asset, not just athletes.
I see where you're coming from, but China does not "own" this guy however much they have invested in him.
any country can prevent a citizen from leaving... i'm sure there are several people in the states, whom the u.s. government would try to prevent from leaving the country.
and don't forget, he has the option to disobey and suffer the consequences.
Besides, I don't see them pulling this same crap with the thousands of chinese PhD's that live and work in the US for american companies. Isn't that the same thing, though on a less glamorous scale than that of a pro athlete? It's a huge brain drain that could be working to improve China and its technology, but they are instead working for us.
i don't think they invest nearly as much for your average PhD. but you are right, it is a brain drain, and i'm sure they're looking for ways to stop that.
it's the same concept with any asset, not just athletes.
I see where you're coming from, but China does not "own" this guy however much they have invested in him.
any country can prevent a citizen from leaving... i'm sure there are several people in the states, whom the u.s. government would try to prevent from leaving the country.
and don't forget, he has the option to disobey and suffer the consequences.
Besides, I don't see them pulling this same crap with the thousands of chinese PhD's that live and work in the US for american companies. Isn't that the same thing, though on a less glamorous scale than that of a pro athlete? It's a huge brain drain that could be working to improve China and its technology, but they are instead working for us.
i don't think they invest nearly as much for your average PhD. but you are right, it is a brain drain, and i'm sure they're looking for ways to stop that.
