China's homegrown CPU

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MadRat

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
11,971
291
126
Come to think of it, would that make it the Dragon vs. the Palladium (Paladin = knight)...
 

cutty

Senior member
Oct 30, 2001
311
0
0
It won't be too long. The developer there are trying their best to make next generation Godson.
A great idea, can I buy some from China at price of $2 and take back sale as $10? It's still a great price for a Pentium II level CPU isn't it? :)

Originally posted by: psianime
When will newegg sell these puppies?

-psianime
 

Davegod

Platinum Member
Nov 26, 2001
2,874
0
76
Originally posted by: dexvx
Everyone has a conpiracy theory.

On the relative note, if it auto blocks some sites and doesnt show some good TV programming, there would be little reason for anyone to buy it. Its a market economy in China, and it has been for the last decade.

spot on tbh. China produces a non-Amercian CPU and opts for a non-Amercian controlled OS. Shocking isnt it, reach for the book of Prejudicial Thought chaps. Sorry but you guys dont understand the extent many countries consider America threat #1: militarily, economically, politically, culturally. Basing all core tech on American makes as much sense as America relying on Cuba for 100% food needs.
 

vegetation

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
4,270
2
0
Great, now we can look forward to a billion hackers with unrestricted spamming outside of their country. Wonderful news for us server admins.
 

DOOMIII

Junior Member
Dec 23, 2002
16
0
0
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: DOOMIII
Exactly,the cpu now days is far less intelligent to do such task. Even the OS can not do it either(at least temporaly)
The GODSON's not designed for the public so there's no conflict between it and conventional cpu vendor like intel,amd,etc.

What about that thing (name escapes me at the moment) that M$ and AMD and Intel are doing? Its supposed to be anti-piracy in the hardware and software method...

Maybe that is why? Regardless it'd be cool to have one of those CPUs.


Although there might sth. like DRM,i still can't see the vast adoption of this technology,not to mention it's nearly impossible to apply this technology to all the pages on the internet which could be regarded as the most dangerous.what i mean is that technology cannot detect the content of softwares or web pages which have nothing re-defined included(you may recall digital signature here).
 

DOOMIII

Junior Member
Dec 23, 2002
16
0
0
Originally posted by: vegetation
Great, now we can look forward to a billion hackers with unrestricted spamming outside of their country. Wonderful news for us server admins.

I'm afraid your wish might go by the board.GODSON is not designed for convertional use,so far as I know its biggest market is embeded-system,which means that it's transparent to you.are there many hackers pay attention to router more than to server in this world? i bet no.
 

uncleX

Member
Nov 22, 2002
73
0
0
As the cancerous tendrils of the Digital Millenium Act undermine freedom in the US and other Western nations, the irony is that commie bastards, or former commie bastards, will provide the new avenues of freedom, as they develop the hardware and open source software, to circumvent the intended totalitarian syndicalism our political and intellectual leadership have in mind for their citizens. Meanwhile libertarians, as they imagine themselves, embrace totalitarianism in the guise of protecting "intellectual" property rights. "Intellectual" property is not property; it is a Trojan Horse toward complete economic control by the central government, the supreme directive of every politician and all intellectuals.

Syndicalism is a version of socialism developed by Mussolini in Italy, and later recast into National Socialism (the Nazis) by Hitler in Germany. In the US, they together got the name Fascism. As advocated by intellectuals in US it is called "regulation", or "deregulation", or "a partnership between government and the private sector."

The constructs about possible backdoors is just the kind of lame-brained, pointy-headed, new-think paranoia that political leaders everywhere are prone to, and which intellectuals everywhere find intellectually stimulating. Since it goes over quite well to sell expensive government programs to the credulous public, it is a sure winner. Our leaders never foresaw the degree of freedom which the Internet would provide. In the past, people had to somehow physically cross borders to gain access to competitive political domains, now they only have to reach the Internet. Now our US leadership has the opportunity to reassert its dominance, and thwart what has come into being. Will "liberal" courts uphold the challange to liberty the new "antipiracy/security" laws embody, or will real liberalism be reawakened and reborn as judges face reality, as opposed to courtroom legalisms? I don't hold out much hope for the courts. But we still have the anarchistic interaction between Western nations and westernizing nations to work with.
 

Davegod

Platinum Member
Nov 26, 2001
2,874
0
76
you'd think people would be embarrased to post such ridiculous crap as some posts in here.