China Pulls Almost Even With 1930's Japan

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,851
10,625
147
Almost.

They now have an aircraft carrier, they just don't have any planes that can actually land on it!

In all seriousness, geography and economics do not favor continued American dominance in the South China Sea in the long term.
 

StrangerGuy

Diamond Member
May 9, 2004
8,443
124
106
Let me be the first to say just because they have an aircraft carrier doesn't mean they need them. In 1930s there aren't spy sats, supercavitating torpedos and ballistic ASMs to wreck surface warships either. Lay off the "hurr mighty amurika!" shades for a bit.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Almost.

They now have an aircraft carrier, they just don't have any planes that can actually land on it!

In all seriousness, geography and economics do not favor continued American dominance in the South China Sea in the long term.

No, but that may not be necessary depending on the pace of technology. I can think of some scenarios which would make large scale Chinese navies ineffective at best. Watch out for that tuna!
 

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
Good post by the op, but they could defeat America and then colonize and enslave with half the power theyve built up, all things considered. I think the probability it will happen is significant.

Let me be the first to say just because they have an aircraft carrier doesn't mean they need them. In 1930s there aren't spy sats, supercavitating torpedos and ballistic ASMs to wreck surface warships either. Lay off the "hurr mighty amurika!" shades for a bit
I agree with that. In wwi the munitions factory wasnt to the losing side's advantage and nazi Germany was also more advanced than every where else... they didn't win then either.

Neither Japan nor nazi Germany really wanted to fight America, while china would considering if we just push them a bit or attack Russia or Iran. Iran is the weakest and the least angry with the u.s. gov of the three, but the republic of china realizes that it needs the islamic republic of iran as does the state of Russia. Chinese people have higher T levels on avg so they're far more likely to do more to us without us doing anything near what we did to Japan ( or nazi Germany for that matter.)

America would be better off if the state didn't have as much tech. Too much tech in the hands of the american state will be the downfall of the American people. As you meant to say, American state is mighty against its own subjects, but it's not necessarily mighty against foreign states.
 
Last edited:

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Chinese people have higher T levels on avg so they're far more likely to do more to us without us doing anything near what we did to Japan ( or nazi Germany for that matter.)

Did you use this to determine "levels'?
e-meter.jpg


I don't even know what you just said. "Do more to us without us doing anything..." What does that mean?
 

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
[...]I don't even know what you just said. "Do more to us without us doing anything..." What does that mean?[...]
. It means that the FDR forced Japan into attacking pearl harbor... he did a lot to the Japanese to make it so it was no longer worthwhile for them to stand buy while FDR does shit to them. He went after Japan so hard because hitler wouldn't take the bait.. how much bait hitler was offered I don't exactly know, but I know that Japan was offered a lot of bait and their govt eventually determined it was worthit even though it wasn't. Long story short, the us gov shouldn't actually take actions try to piss China off because theyll bite a lot earlier... people with high testosterone levels snap earlier and easier than people without high testosterone levels. I think Iran will be the ones taking the bait, but it's not like we know that they aren't allies with china.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
They now have an aircraft carrier, they just don't have any planes that can actually land on it!

Not to worry. The Chinese are downloading the blueprints of the F-35 as we speak... if they have not done so already. My guess is the are waiting in Lockheed Martin to tweak the design a little.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Not to worry. The Chinese are downloading the blueprints of the F-35 as we speak... if they have not done so already. My guess is the are waiting in Lockheed Martin to tweak the design a little.

As long as we have P3 Orions to monitor the Chinese Navy, there is no concern for worry.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Who needs an aircraft carrier when you have nuclear weapons?

Broadening it a bit, why have conventional forces when you have nuclear weapons? Because you might survive using the first, but you certainly won't with the latter.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
FDR forced Japan into attacking pearl harbor.

hitler-watermelon.gif


A feeble crippled democrat socialist and a buncha stalinist commies pwned you rightie noobs and squished all your dudes in Berlin/Tokyo.

Now you and Ru Paul are the last holdout of true capitalism. Our hero! :wub:
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
198
106
Broadening it a bit, why have conventional forces when you have nuclear weapons? Because you might survive using the first, but you certainly won't with the latter.

Give it another decade, and china will be a world military power.

Currently they are a economic powerhouse. With free trade, we have given china all of the technology it needs to match the US in military might.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Anarchist, a land invasion of the USA is the stupidest move anyone could ever do. There is to large a population with to many guns. Even if they some how managed to land heavier armor it would do little to no good. Do they bomb us and blow us all up? Destroy the resources that are the spoils of war? Don't think so lowly of the Chinese.
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
198
106
Anarchist, a land invasion of the USA is the stupidest move anyone could ever do. There is to large a population with to many guns. Even if they some how managed to land heavier armor it would do little to no good. Do they bomb us and blow us all up? Destroy the resources that are the spoils of war? Don't think so lowly of the Chinese.

Would our society even fight back?

As long as people can go to work, play video games, watch sports,,, would they care if we were invaded?
 

railer

Golden Member
Apr 15, 2000
1,552
69
91
Anarchist, a land invasion of the USA is the stupidest move anyone could ever do. There is to large a population with to many guns. Even if they some how managed to land heavier armor it would do little to no good. Do they bomb us and blow us all up? Destroy the resources that are the spoils of war? Don't think so lowly of the Chinese.

Well.....a bunch of rednecks with shotguns wouldn't make a damn bit of difference to a trained army anyway. Irag and Afghanistan had a lot of guns too....look where that got them. Not saying that an invasion of the US would be smart or winnnable by anyone, but the reason for that is not becuase of Jethro, his rebel flag, and his AR15.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
Anarchist, a land invasion of the USA is the stupidest move anyone could ever do. There is to large a population with to many guns. Even if they some how managed to land heavier armor it would do little to no good. Do they bomb us and blow us all up? Destroy the resources that are the spoils of war? Don't think so lowly of the Chinese.

I would think the pacific ocean is a bigger problem.
 

ichy

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2006
6,940
8
81
They now have an aircraft carrier, they just don't have any planes that can actually land on it!

Meh, the Chinese can just buy some from the Russians.

I don't think that anyone in the Chinese Navy thinks they'll ever use this ship to fight a war. The reason they bought a second hand Russian aircraft carrier is so that they can learn to operate one.

Carrier operations are an incredibly complicated business and you can't just learn how to do it from a textbook. You have to built up a certain amount of institutional knowledge and you can't do that without a ship to practice with. I once read an interesting comparison of the US and Japanese navies at the start of WW2. American ships were just as good if not better than the Japanese and so were our pilots, but what the USN lacked was the ability to operate multiple carriers together and launch big strikes of dozens to hundreds of aircraft at a time. It took years of practice and experimentation for them to get that down. That's what the Chinese want to do, learn how to use an aircraft carrier.
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
198
106
Well.....a bunch of rednecks with shotguns wouldn't make a damn bit of difference to a trained army anyway. Irag and Afghanistan had a lot of guns too....look where that got them. Not saying that an invasion of the US would be smart or winnnable by anyone, but the reason for that is not becuase of Jethro, his rebel flag, and his AR15.

The volunteers of the revolutionary army did pretty good,
Texas won its freedom from Mexico by a bunch of volunteers with muzzleloaders,
War of 1812 - Andrew Jackson and volunteers beat a well trained british army at the battle of New Orleans
Vietnam
Afghanistan
300 Spartans held of thousands of Persians,

The list goes on and on.
 

ichy

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2006
6,940
8
81
The idea of China invading the United States is the most absurd thing I have ever heard.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Well.....a bunch of rednecks with shotguns wouldn't make a damn bit of difference to a trained army anyway. Irag and Afghanistan had a lot of guns too....look where that got them. Not saying that an invasion of the US would be smart or winnnable by anyone, but the reason for that is not becuase of Jethro, his rebel flag, and his AR15.

You say that, but you really have no idea what you're talking about. Texashiker is probably the closest, would anyone actually stand up and fight? Or would we just be like "Hurry up and get it over with, we need to get back to watching American Idol?"

I personally would just go to the hills/mountains. No one has ever truly successfully fucked with hill/mountain people.
 

nyker96

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2005
5,630
2
81
Let me be the first to say just because they have an aircraft carrier doesn't mean they need them. In 1930s there aren't spy sats, supercavitating torpedos and ballistic ASMs to wreck surface warships either. Lay off the "hurr mighty amurika!" shades for a bit.

+1, from everything I have read, this carrier is just for training purposes and isn't very high on China's priority list. It's just a show piece, ballistic subs, ICBM, spy sat, drones etc, seems to be where they are concentrating R&D at. To be quite frankly, carrier aren't too useful to them when they have ICBMs that can deliver nuke payload to every South Asian country.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Well.....a bunch of rednecks with shotguns wouldn't make a damn bit of difference to a trained army anyway. Irag and Afghanistan had a lot of guns too....look where that got them. Not saying that an invasion of the US would be smart or winnnable by anyone, but the reason for that is not becuase of Jethro, his rebel flag, and his AR15.
I wouldn't be too sure of that. Afghanistan thoroughly whipped the Soviets, a much more ruthless dictatorship committing much more in the way of military assets. We beat Afghanistan only by backing one group against the other; had we simply invaded the whole nation would have joined and kicked us out.

Ho Chi Min said "You will kill ten of us for every one of you we kill, and in the end you'll be the one who tires of it." He was correct. In the end, the population with the will, wins, as long as it is reasonably armed. The USA is highly armed, with shotguns (deadliest close combat weapon), pistols (highly concealable), and rifles that can reliably take down a man at four hundred yards, through military-grade body armor. Even with our inevitable quislings, an invader would have a difficult time pacifying America.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
The Japanese navy in 1930 was far more robust than the Chinese navy of 2012.

Yup and more experience with naval warfare. Japanese Navy demolished Russia Navy in 1905 at the Battle of Tsushima.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
. It means that the FDR forced Japan into attacking pearl harbor... he did a lot to the Japanese to make it so it was no longer worthwhile for them to stand buy while FDR does shit to them. He went after Japan so hard because hitler wouldn't take the bait.. how much bait hitler was offered I don't exactly know, but I know that Japan was offered a lot of bait and their govt eventually determined it was worthit even though it wasn't. Long story short, the us gov shouldn't actually take actions try to piss China off because theyll bite a lot earlier... people with high testosterone levels snap earlier and easier than people without high testosterone levels. I think Iran will be the ones taking the bait, but it's not like we know that they aren't allies with china.
you need to start taking your meds again....what you just said is batshit insane.....