- Oct 9, 1999
- 46,851
- 10,625
- 147
Almost.
They now have an aircraft carrier, they just don't have any planes that can actually land on it!
In all seriousness, geography and economics do not favor continued American dominance in the South China Sea in the long term.
I agree with that. In wwi the munitions factory wasnt to the losing side's advantage and nazi Germany was also more advanced than every where else... they didn't win then either.Let me be the first to say just because they have an aircraft carrier doesn't mean they need them. In 1930s there aren't spy sats, supercavitating torpedos and ballistic ASMs to wreck surface warships either. Lay off the "hurr mighty amurika!" shades for a bit
Chinese people have higher T levels on avg so they're far more likely to do more to us without us doing anything near what we did to Japan ( or nazi Germany for that matter.)
. It means that the FDR forced Japan into attacking pearl harbor... he did a lot to the Japanese to make it so it was no longer worthwhile for them to stand buy while FDR does shit to them. He went after Japan so hard because hitler wouldn't take the bait.. how much bait hitler was offered I don't exactly know, but I know that Japan was offered a lot of bait and their govt eventually determined it was worthit even though it wasn't. Long story short, the us gov shouldn't actually take actions try to piss China off because theyll bite a lot earlier... people with high testosterone levels snap earlier and easier than people without high testosterone levels. I think Iran will be the ones taking the bait, but it's not like we know that they aren't allies with china.[...]I don't even know what you just said. "Do more to us without us doing anything..." What does that mean?[...]
They now have an aircraft carrier, they just don't have any planes that can actually land on it!
Not to worry. The Chinese are downloading the blueprints of the F-35 as we speak... if they have not done so already. My guess is the are waiting in Lockheed Martin to tweak the design a little.
They now have an aircraft carrier, they just don't have any planes that can actually land on it!
Who needs an aircraft carrier when you have nuclear weapons?
FDR forced Japan into attacking pearl harbor.
Broadening it a bit, why have conventional forces when you have nuclear weapons? Because you might survive using the first, but you certainly won't with the latter.
Anarchist, a land invasion of the USA is the stupidest move anyone could ever do. There is to large a population with to many guns. Even if they some how managed to land heavier armor it would do little to no good. Do they bomb us and blow us all up? Destroy the resources that are the spoils of war? Don't think so lowly of the Chinese.
Anarchist, a land invasion of the USA is the stupidest move anyone could ever do. There is to large a population with to many guns. Even if they some how managed to land heavier armor it would do little to no good. Do they bomb us and blow us all up? Destroy the resources that are the spoils of war? Don't think so lowly of the Chinese.
Anarchist, a land invasion of the USA is the stupidest move anyone could ever do. There is to large a population with to many guns. Even if they some how managed to land heavier armor it would do little to no good. Do they bomb us and blow us all up? Destroy the resources that are the spoils of war? Don't think so lowly of the Chinese.
They now have an aircraft carrier, they just don't have any planes that can actually land on it!
Well.....a bunch of rednecks with shotguns wouldn't make a damn bit of difference to a trained army anyway. Irag and Afghanistan had a lot of guns too....look where that got them. Not saying that an invasion of the US would be smart or winnnable by anyone, but the reason for that is not becuase of Jethro, his rebel flag, and his AR15.
Well.....a bunch of rednecks with shotguns wouldn't make a damn bit of difference to a trained army anyway. Irag and Afghanistan had a lot of guns too....look where that got them. Not saying that an invasion of the US would be smart or winnnable by anyone, but the reason for that is not becuase of Jethro, his rebel flag, and his AR15.
Let me be the first to say just because they have an aircraft carrier doesn't mean they need them. In 1930s there aren't spy sats, supercavitating torpedos and ballistic ASMs to wreck surface warships either. Lay off the "hurr mighty amurika!" shades for a bit.
I wouldn't be too sure of that. Afghanistan thoroughly whipped the Soviets, a much more ruthless dictatorship committing much more in the way of military assets. We beat Afghanistan only by backing one group against the other; had we simply invaded the whole nation would have joined and kicked us out.Well.....a bunch of rednecks with shotguns wouldn't make a damn bit of difference to a trained army anyway. Irag and Afghanistan had a lot of guns too....look where that got them. Not saying that an invasion of the US would be smart or winnnable by anyone, but the reason for that is not becuase of Jethro, his rebel flag, and his AR15.
The Japanese navy in 1930 was far more robust than the Chinese navy of 2012.
you need to start taking your meds again....what you just said is batshit insane...... It means that the FDR forced Japan into attacking pearl harbor... he did a lot to the Japanese to make it so it was no longer worthwhile for them to stand buy while FDR does shit to them. He went after Japan so hard because hitler wouldn't take the bait.. how much bait hitler was offered I don't exactly know, but I know that Japan was offered a lot of bait and their govt eventually determined it was worthit even though it wasn't. Long story short, the us gov shouldn't actually take actions try to piss China off because theyll bite a lot earlier... people with high testosterone levels snap earlier and easier than people without high testosterone levels. I think Iran will be the ones taking the bait, but it's not like we know that they aren't allies with china.