• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Chili doesn't have beans

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
BEANS WERE USED AS A MEAT SUBSTITUTE IN CHILI RECIPES BECAUSE POOR PEOPLE NOT FROM SAN ANTONIO COULD NOT AFFORD THE AMOUNT OF BEEF REQUIRED.

Just so we're clear, Mr Angry Chilli Douche, you're stating here that at one time in a certain place people made chilli using beans, yes?
 
lemme guess... aside from working with every major hollywood studio, so you know all facts about every movie...

you also work on the official chili definition committee.


🙄

So instead of just being an ignorant douche you CHOOSE to be an ignorant douche.

🙄
 
So instead of just being an ignorant douche you CHOOSE to be an ignorant douche.

🙄


love_your_job.gif
 
Just so we're clear, Mr Angry Chilli Douche, you're stating here that at one time in a certain place people made chilli using beans, yes?

it isn't chili at that point, it's a different dish. The dish as others has said is "Chili con Carne" chili with meat. If you substitute meat with beans it is no longer chili con carne is it?
 
it isn't chili at that point, it's a different dish. The dish as others has said is "Chili con Carne" chili with meat. If you substitute meat with beans it is no longer chili con carne is it?

So you're saying it's no longer chilli if it has onion in it? What about when I thicken mine slightly with corn starch? What about if someone dips crackers in it? Are you stupid?
 
So you're saying it's no longer chilli if it has onion in it? What about when I thicken mine slightly with corn starch? What about if someone dips crackers in it? Are you stupid?

Mike Gayner, chili can have onion as onion isn't a meat substitute. Dipping crackers in already cooked chili is perfectly acceptable as the chili and crackers were prepared and cooked separately. You can't really even give a good argument for what you're arguing for.
 
it isn't chili at that point, it's a different dish. The dish as others has said is "Chili con Carne" chili with meat. If you substitute meat with beans it is no longer chili con carne is it?

By that logic "traditional" chili that you make isn't chili because the cuts of meat used haven't been placed between the saddle and blanket of a riding horse for a 10-12 hour day of riding to break down the meat/connective tissue to make it edible.
 
Wow, we must all be pretty bored at work today. You guys, considering you are splitting hairs over the most mundane details. And me, actually reading through this garbage.

Let's just go home already.
 
Mike Gayner, chili can have onion as onion isn't a meat substitute. Dipping crackers in already cooked chili is perfectly acceptable as the chili and crackers were prepared and cooked separately. You can't really even give a good argument for what you're arguing for.

I'm nominating bfdd for most retarded ATOTer of 2010 award for his stubborn insolence in this chilli debate.
 
Beans are meat substitutes. I'm not saying adding beans to chili is WRONG, I'm saying chili doesn't have beans in it. As in when you prepare and cook chili, it should contain no beans what so ever.

They are only a meat substitute if you leave some meat out to add them, yes?

What about if you add them as well as the full amount of meat?
 
By that logic "traditional" chili that you make isn't chili because the cuts of meat used haven't been placed between the saddle and blanket of a riding horse for a 10-12 hour day of riding to break down the meat/connective tissue to make it edible.

If I had a saddle and horse to do that with I would, but I don't so I can't. I'm stuck "beating my meat" so to speak. Also, yes I am incredibly bored so I'm arguing mostly for the sake of argument.
 
I'm nominating bfdd for most retarded ATOTer of 2010 award for his stubborn insolence in this chilli debate.

How am I the most retarded for my stubborness? I don't think it's any more or less retarded than you saying adding crackers to already made chili some how changes the dish.
 
i had a 1k protein shake with an entire can of turkey chili, some cottage cheese, 4 oz of steak, 1tbsp of flax seed oil, small salad, some rice, and an apple last night before bed.

what did you phags eat? learn to eat like a man. Oh noes there's beans in my chili. I'm not to look like an emo twig anymore.
 
i had a 1k protein shake with an entire can of turkey chili, some cottage cheese, 4 oz of steak, 1tbsp of flax seed oil, small salad, some rice, and an apple last night before bed.

what did you phags eat? learn to eat like a man. Oh noes there's beans in my chili. I'm not to look like an emo twig anymore.

Thats not eating like a man, that's eating like a fucking weirdo.
 
i had a 1k protein shake with an entire can of turkey chili, some cottage cheese, 4 oz of steak, 1tbsp of flax seed oil, small salad, some rice, and an apple last night before bed.

What did you phags eat? Learn to eat like a man. Oh noes there's beans in my chili. I'm not to look like an emo twig anymore.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
 

Thanks for enlightening me on what I should name the food that I eat. You don't want me to call my chili 'chili' because it has beans? Sure thing boss. I'll call it chilii, and I can guarantee it'll taste much better than your hot dog sauce does.
 
So you're saying it's no longer chilli if it has onion in it? What about when I thicken mine slightly with corn starch? What about if someone dips crackers in it? Are you stupid?

I don't think you can destroy anyone in an argument better than you have.
 
Back
Top