- Oct 9, 1999
- 21,014
- 137
- 106
UPDATE April 15 - The Social Security Administration has stopped providing information to the IRS concerning this "program", due to public outrage and so many people contacting their elected representatives.
http://consumerist.com/2014/04/15/s...-seizing-tax-refunds-to-pay-decades-old-debt/
Kind of odd that they first defended this by saying they had no choice since it was a law, but now that the heat is on they can unilaterially choose to stop. Good for everyone who raised a fuss with Congress over this ridiculous initiative.
Original post:
The government has started to seize tax refunds from children of parents who (according to the government) received overpayments of Social Security benefits.
The government eliminated the 10-year statute of limitations on repayment of debt to the government. And when the people who received the overpayments have since died, the are seizing tax refunds of the children - starting with the eldest when they can find a good current address.
The rationale is that if the parent received survivors benefits that were paid for the benefit of the children, then the children should have to repay. I'm astounded.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ac8eae-bf4d-11e3-bcec-b71ee10e9bc3_story.html
http://consumerist.com/2014/04/15/s...-seizing-tax-refunds-to-pay-decades-old-debt/
Kind of odd that they first defended this by saying they had no choice since it was a law, but now that the heat is on they can unilaterially choose to stop. Good for everyone who raised a fuss with Congress over this ridiculous initiative.
Original post:
The government has started to seize tax refunds from children of parents who (according to the government) received overpayments of Social Security benefits.
The government eliminated the 10-year statute of limitations on repayment of debt to the government. And when the people who received the overpayments have since died, the are seizing tax refunds of the children - starting with the eldest when they can find a good current address.
The rationale is that if the parent received survivors benefits that were paid for the benefit of the children, then the children should have to repay. I'm astounded.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ac8eae-bf4d-11e3-bcec-b71ee10e9bc3_story.html
Last edited: