Originally posted by: Roguestar
Bet you aren't thinking of that when you're banging the little blond cutie and thinking "I hope she's on the pill".
Originally posted by: FeuerFrei
Actually you could do it for well under $100k. Perhaps $150k if they go to a private school. Assuming no costly medical procedures.
Nobody spends $1,876.64/mo on a kid.
Originally posted by: LolaWiz
I can believe it costs this much, HOWEVER.... what about the positive things between the parent and child relationship.
I thank God everyday that my parents did not purely care about how much i was costing them every day of their life and mine.
This article and some posts on here make me rather annoyed that the monitary issue is the only thing that matters. I KNOW kids are expensive and i don't even have one yet, BUT i would never not want to have kids just because i know they are expensive and not worth that money.
The relationship I have with my parents is what i hope to have with my child (someday perhaps) and no amount of money would make me want to change that.
Originally posted by: tfinch2
The tab for a child born in 2006 is expected to run $381,000 over 17 years for the highest-income U.S. households
You left the most important part of that statistic out. :roll:
Yeah after I divided it out, it did seem high. It does say that figure is for the highest income U.S. households. So yeah, a BMW is probably figured in there somewhere.Originally posted by: FeuerFrei
Actually you could do it for well under $100k. Perhaps $150k if they go to a private school. Assuming no costly medical procedures.
Nobody spends $1,876.64/mo on a kid.
Originally posted by: LolaWiz
I can believe it costs this much, HOWEVER.... what about the positive things between the parent and child relationship.
I thank God everyday that my parents did not purely care about how much i was costing them every day of their life and mine.
This article and some posts on here make me rather annoyed that the monitary issue is the only thing that matters. I KNOW kids are expensive and i don't even have one yet, BUT i would never not want to have kids just because i know they are expensive and not worth that money.
The relationship I have with my parents is what i hope to have with my child (someday perhaps) and no amount of money would make me want to change that.
Originally posted by: Flyback
That is rather cheap compared to what you get in exchange (given that you raise the children properly and don't have delinquents).
I don't plan on having kids, but I definitely see the reward they bring. $381k is nothing in that sense.
Originally posted by: BlueWeasel
Nice timing. Our baby boy will likely be born this week.![]()
Originally posted by: tfinch2
The tab for a child born in 2006 is expected to run $381,000 over 17 years for the highest-income U.S. households
You left the most important part of that statistic out. :roll:
Originally posted by: Roguestar
Bet you aren't thinking of that when you're banging the little blond cutie and thinking "I hope she's on the pill".
Originally posted by: tfinch2
The tab for a child born in 2006 is expected to run $381,000 over 17 years for the highest-income U.S. households
You left the most important part of that statistic out. :roll:
Originally posted by: clamum
Yeah after I divided it out, it did seem high. It does say that figure is for the highest income U.S. households. So yeah, a BMW is probably figured in there somewhere.Originally posted by: FeuerFrei
Actually you could do it for well under $100k. Perhaps $150k if they go to a private school. Assuming no costly medical procedures.
Nobody spends $1,876.64/mo on a kid.![]()
Originally posted by: tfinch2
The tab for a child born in 2006 is expected to run $381,000 over 17 years for the highest-income U.S. households
You left the most important part of that statistic out. :roll:
Originally posted by: tfinch2
The tab for a child born in 2006 is expected to run $381,000 over 17 years for the highest-income U.S. households
You left the most important part of that statistic out. :roll:
