• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Child porn investigation nabs ex clinton aide.

Originally posted by: shocksyde
Originally posted by: rasczak
looks like Bill Clinton wasn't the only dirty old man in the white house

Dirty old man

1. Wrong forum
2. So what?

1. I didn't think there was anything political about it at all.
2. I also thought it was kinda funny considering the troubles little bill went through during his time as president. (don't get me wrong, i am a fan of billy boy).
 
Bad title?

The problem isn't that he's a dirty old man. Most of us here are going to be dirty old men. But pedophilia and child pornography. That's a definite no no. Even for a purple heart recipient.
 
i feel like this could happen accidentally. you know how you download some random stuff on the internet and BOOM you get arrested because the girl in the video is 17 and 11 months old.

and it wont even matter that you deleted it right away because they already have a record that you downloaded it.
 
Originally posted by: cerebusPu
i feel like this could happen accidentally. you know how you download some random stuff on the internet and BOOM you get arrested because the girl in the video is 17 and 11 months old.

and it wont even matter that you deleted it right away because they already have a record that you downloaded it.


this is true, hence why i do not download porn, i view it on websites that verify the actresses ages. However, it does not explain why the accused had over 600 photos of little girls doing horrendous things with adult males in this instance.
 
Originally posted by: rasczak
Originally posted by: cerebusPu
i feel like this could happen accidentally. you know how you download some random stuff on the internet and BOOM you get arrested because the girl in the video is 17 and 11 months old.

and it wont even matter that you deleted it right away because they already have a record that you downloaded it.


this is true, hence why i do not download porn, i view it on websites that verify the actresses ages. However, it does not explain why the accused had over 600 photos of little girls doing horrendous things with adult males in this instance.

:laugh:
 
Originally posted by: buck
Originally posted by: rasczak
Originally posted by: cerebusPu
i feel like this could happen accidentally. you know how you download some random stuff on the internet and BOOM you get arrested because the girl in the video is 17 and 11 months old.

and it wont even matter that you deleted it right away because they already have a record that you downloaded it.


this is true, hence why i do not download porn, i view it on websites that verify the actresses ages. However, it does not explain why the accused had over 600 photos of little girls doing horrendous things with adult males in this instance.

:laugh:

just stick to milfs..problem solved
 
Originally posted by: dbk
Originally posted by: buck
Originally posted by: rasczak
Originally posted by: cerebusPu
i feel like this could happen accidentally. you know how you download some random stuff on the internet and BOOM you get arrested because the girl in the video is 17 and 11 months old.

and it wont even matter that you deleted it right away because they already have a record that you downloaded it.


this is true, hence why i do not download porn, i view it on websites that verify the actresses ages. However, it does not explain why the accused had over 600 photos of little girls doing horrendous things with adult males in this instance.

:laugh:

just stick to milfs..problem solved

😉
 
Originally posted by: cerebusPu
i feel like this could happen accidentally. you know how you download some random stuff on the internet and BOOM you get arrested because the girl in the video is 17 and 11 months old.

and it wont even matter that you deleted it right away because they already have a record that you downloaded it.

given that there were pictures of prepubescent girls, i don't think it happened by accident.
 
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Originally posted by: AkumaX
Originally posted by: shocksyde

2. So what?

So what? So What?! WILL SOMEBODY PLEEEAZE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!!

Originally posted by: dNor
in before someone mentions me regarding AkumaX's comment of So what? So What?! WILL SOMEBODY PLEEEAZE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!! (http://forums.anandtech.com/me...2260328&enterthread=y)

Posted for dNor 🙂

that link is tootally brokd
 
Originally posted by: hdeck
Originally posted by: cerebusPu
i feel like this could happen accidentally. you know how you download some random stuff on the internet and BOOM you get arrested because the girl in the video is 17 and 11 months old.

and it wont even matter that you deleted it right away because they already have a record that you downloaded it.

given that there were pictures of prepubescent girls, i don't think it happened by accident.

still could have been open wifi/hacked account etc.

there are lots of ways to get control of someones machine. there have been a few cases where people have won useing that defence.


but im sure they have logs etc to nail the sick fuck.
 
Back
Top