SMOGZINN
Lifer
- Jun 17, 2005
- 14,359
- 4,640
- 136
![]()
You judge a persons morals by the brand of chicken sandwiches they eat?
LOL
Uno
No, I judge people based on how they spend their money, for that is where their real morals lie.
![]()
You judge a persons morals by the brand of chicken sandwiches they eat?
LOL
Uno
Way to not address the issue being talked about. The issue is not what CFA does, or if they have the right to do so. What I am saying is that you can't know how they spend the money you give them and still claim no responsibility for enabling it.
That is true.uh... people give them money in exchange for food.
Those people are not responcible for CFA's views, they are responcibly for supporting them in the actions they take based on those views.those people arent responsible for any political or religious views of CFA just like how CFA isnt responsible for how your next dump goes.
yes, you can apply a certain amount of causation, but pretty much zero responsibility.
Chik-fil-uh has stated their religious beliefs will prevent them from ever opening a store here so, as far as I am concerned, they can go DIAF.
Where there is causation there is responsibility. 'Just following orders' is not a defense and neither is 'I didn't swing the axe', by knowingly supporting them financially you make yourself a part of the crime.
No kidding. I pine for the good old days when we could execute gays right here in America simply for choosing to be gay.
"Hate."Pretending that you can abdicate yourself from responsibility by simply not caring is also stupid. How ever you try to fool yourself you are helping support the hate that they spew.
Don't you live in Sacramento? If so, there is one there.
There are two here in the Silicon Valley area.
The point is that it does not matter where you stand in the line of people necessary to commit the crime. If you knowingly assist in the crime you are responsible for it.a poor comparison there... we arent following orders or swinging the axe. we are the guy cutting down the tree so the axe handle can be made. or connecting the telephone wires so that the order can be given.
Truthfully, I find that an interesting question that I will have to think about.i bet you would blame the chicken farmers for hate crimes if you could....
They don't put it on their menu's but they pretty proudly proclaim it anytime they get the chance.if they openly post these on their menus or restaurants some such, then i can see where you are coming from. do they?
If causing it doesn't make you responcible then what does?and i do not agree that causation equals responsibility.
"Hate."
They "spew" Christian love from everything I've seen. Christians are supposed to love homosexuals and all people, even "sinners" -- because Jesus loved them, even as unrepentant sinners.
Read up on the morals and values of Chik-fil-a and get back to us. You do know the company supported the execution of gays through their indirect sponsorship of religious political parties in Africa in don't you? Morals indeed.
Hm, sometimes I have a really hard time telling the difference between hate and 'christian love'.
Now continue reading about where your lunch money was going.I'm sure that's another misrepresented story that went viral after some deliberately-deceptive blogger posted it.
No mention of it here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chick-fil-A#Same-sex_marriage_controversy
If causing it doesn't make you responcible then what does?
Now continue reading about where your lunch money was going.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Research_Council
In 2012, a security guard working at the FRC headquarters was shot by a man who saw the organization listed on the SPLC's web site.
FRC does not support the Uganda bill, and does not support the death penalty for homosexuality - nor any other penalty which would have the effect of inhibiting compassionate pastoral, psychological, and medical care and treatment for those who experience same-sex attractions or who engage in homosexual conduct
I understand that, and fully support their right to believe that.
I agree with both of those statements.
And still we agree.
Way to not address the issue being talked about. The issue is not what CFA does, or if they have the right to do so. What I am saying is that you can't know how they spend the money you give them and still claim no responsibility for enabling it.
Really? I don't mean to bash your tastes, as everyone has their own preferences, but I've never understood how people enjoy Cracker Barrel. I've had several things on their menu (I've been there about a dozen times split between breakfast and dinner and have gotten different things each time) and I don't find any of the meals to be very appealing. I think the pancakes in the OP look just fine, but man I just can't accept favoring Cracker Barrel pancakes over those based on the picture.The pancakes do look meh, Cracker Barrell has the best pancakes
![]()
I don't care what they spend their money on, none of my business.
They were called out on their support for a murderous policy and decided to backtrack....and I guess you missed this:
Which is simply another way of saying they are anti-gay. However they took it a step further than most bigots. They happily ponied up the money to prop up those who would kill gays while cowardly hiding behind their sock-puppet god.As far as I can tell, they're anti-gay only because they are anti-sin.
That's fine. Felix went out his way to praise CFA's morals and values, that's all.Well if in some people's opinion I am wrong for eating Cfa then that is fine, people can have their opinions. I love their spicy checked bisquits