Chicago Teacher in Teen Sex Bust

[Phoenix86]

Originally posted by: mchammer187

Originally posted by: Ilmater

Originally posted by: Phoenix86

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
I like how they called the teenage boys "victims". So tell me, who was "hurt" or "victimized" by this crime?

This is simply legislation of morality, nothing more.

This is statutory rape, do you think that's ok? Replace the teacher for a man, and the victims for girls, now is it ok?

No, but that's because men and women view sex differently. There's no irreparable harm done to those boys. They've been beating it for years now; who cares?! I'm not sure why they reported her, but I'm guessing that she was caught in some other fashion. I can't imagine them not wanting that to continue.

The alcohol and drugs she used to lure them in is what makes this wrong. Well, I should say that it's not great that she did that, but again, I don't think there's going to be anything seriously wrong with those boys from just the oral sex part.

so if a man offered the boys this all is well too?

after all its just oral sex right

See what happens when you try to justify a double standard?

Who are you (Ilmater) to say no damage was done just for receiving oral? Are you a professional psych.? I'm thinking no. Shooting from the hip? Yep.

Granted there MIGHT be no real damages, but I don't think anyone here is qualified to answer that. At the very least we all can admit if you change the genders of everyone involved there would be a LOT of trauma, and we should assume the same for this case. Remove gender or flip it, and this case becomes clear.

edit: oh, one more thing to think about. Age... If you think it's OK at this age, what about 14? 12? Still as sure it OK? What about 10? 8? Still OK?

 

[Howard]

Originally posted by: Phoenix86

Originally posted by: mchammer187

Originally posted by: Ilmater

Originally posted by: Phoenix86

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
I like how they called the teenage boys "victims". So tell me, who was "hurt" or "victimized" by this crime?

This is simply legislation of morality, nothing more.

This is statutory rape, do you think that's ok? Replace the teacher for a man, and the victims for girls, now is it ok?

No, but that's because men and women view sex differently. There's no irreparable harm done to those boys. They've been beating it for years now; who cares?! I'm not sure why they reported her, but I'm guessing that she was caught in some other fashion. I can't imagine them not wanting that to continue.

The alcohol and drugs she used to lure them in is what makes this wrong. Well, I should say that it's not great that she did that, but again, I don't think there's going to be anything seriously wrong with those boys from just the oral sex part.

so if a man offered the boys this all is well too?

after all its just oral sex right

See what happens when you try to justify a double standard?

Who are you (Ilmater) to say no damage was done just for receiving oral? Are you a professional psych.? I'm thinking no. Shooting from the hip? Yep.

Granted there MIGHT be no real damages, but I don't think anyone here is qualified to answer that. At the very least we all can admit if you change the genders of everyone involved there would be a LOT of trauma, and we should assume the same for this case. Remove gender or flip it, and this case becomes clear.

edit: oh, one more thing to think about. Age... If you think it's OK at this age, what about 14? 12? Still as sure it OK? What about 10? 8? Still OK?

We could always ask every male here if they would have objected to having oral sex performed on them AND making money from it?

By the way, if you didn't read it, the boys accepted the money. Now, if they were girls instead, why would they accept money to be traumatized?

As above, if the boys were willing, I don't see how their age would have mattered. But, at 12, many boys are still going through puberty, so... I don't see how the offer would have appealed to them then.

 

[BustaBust]

Originally posted by: faenix
link

She looks half decent. Why in the world would she pay $5,000 for three 15-16 year olds?

What has this world come to. :disgust:

Half decent?

:disgust:

 

[Psycho18]

rofl @ thread.

 

[JackBurton]

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
To everyone saying she's ugly - it's a goddamn mugshot. You're not exactly looking your best.

And furthermore, what 15/16 year olds need to be paid to get a blow job? I know at that age I sure as hell didn't.

- M4H

She looks pretty damn hot in her mug shot. 🙂

 

[JulesMaximus]

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
To everyone saying she's ugly - it's a goddamn mugshot. You're not exactly looking your best.

And furthermore, what 15/16 year olds need to be paid to get a blow job? I know at that age I sure as hell didn't.

- M4H

Your standards are too low.

 

[Fenixgoon]

Originally posted by: ArmchairAthlete
She's fugly. Especially compared to that last teacher, yea.

 

[KnickNut3]

Originally posted by: Mojoed
Suspended WITH pay? That's retarded.

Wondering how far I'd have to scroll down until someone wrote what I was thinking...

 

[AFB]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
I like how they called the teenage boys "victims". So tell me, who was "hurt" or "victimized" by this crime?

This is simply legislation of morality, nothing more.

I hope you would agree if the teacher was male and the students female.

 

[mztykal]

Dude for 5k and head, I'd go for it. I'd cope with the fact that she's super ugly by buying myself a bunch of stuff...

 

[Howard]

Originally posted by: amdfanboy

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
I like how they called the teenage boys "victims". So tell me, who was "hurt" or "victimized" by this crime?

This is simply legislation of morality, nothing more.

I hope you would agree if the teacher was male and the students female.

Read the thread.

 

[DeeKnow]

Originally posted by: faenix
link

She looks half decent. Why in the world would she pay $5,000 for three 15-16 year olds?

What has this world come to. :disgust:

half decent ...???


half of WHAT ???????

 

[DurocShark]

Originally posted by: poopaskoopa
The last one was hotter.

 

[BigJelly]

Originally posted by: Mojoed
Suspended WITH pay? That's retarded.

Another thing that people missed was that teachers always complain that they are not getting paid enough money so where did she get 5k for sex

 

[Phoenix86]

Originally posted by: Howard

Originally posted by: Phoenix86See what happens when you try to justify a double standard?

Who are you (Ilmater) to say no damage was done just for receiving oral? Are you a professional psych.? I'm thinking no. Shooting from the hip? Yep.

Granted there MIGHT be no real damages, but I don't think anyone here is qualified to answer that. At the very least we all can admit if you change the genders of everyone involved there would be a LOT of trauma, and we should assume the same for this case. Remove gender or flip it, and this case becomes clear.

edit: oh, one more thing to think about. Age... If you think it's OK at this age, what about 14? 12? Still as sure it OK? What about 10? 8? Still OK?

We could always ask every male here if they would have objected to having oral sex performed on them AND making money from it?

By the way, if you didn't read it, the boys accepted the money. Now, if they were girls instead, why would they accept money to be traumatized?

As above, if the boys were willing, I don't see how their age would have mattered. But, at 12, many boys are still going through puberty, so... I don't see how the offer would have appealed to them then.

I don't think boys are qulaified to answer that question, so a poll would be irrelevant. People make lots of bad decisions they think are good, what makes you think children can tell the difference any more than an adult? I was that age too, am I qualified to answer it? Do I know how that would have traumatized me?

I did read it, the money is irrelevant, really. They are children, and not capable of making adult decisions. They CAN'T be willing because they don't have the legal right to make the decision, because of their age. That's what makes it RAPE (statutory).