Feel free to hold me to it. Be prepared to admit you were wrong yourself though if it doesn't turn out the way you want it to, assuming they even go to court in the first place. If they aren't dragged into court within the next year I can only assume it's because a case can't be made. If they aren't in court by the end of next April, or the Obama admin announces that it won't happen, be prepared to admit you were wrong as well.
I damn sure can dismiss them just like I can dismiss professors, engineers, ex-cia, and scientists claiming that the WTC buildings were brought down by demolitions. They haven't provided compelling proof of their claim either. If you want to rely on a bunch of pronouncements and pontifications from authority figures as proof positive and a presentation of the facts, help youself. I can link you to the truther forum too, if you want. Seems right up your acceptance of facts alley.
Don't worry. I'm sure you'll be posting immature responses like the one directly above when you reach 50. It's in your blood. Of course, that assumes you live long enough by avoiding smacking the wrong 50 year old with a newpaper in the first place.Nice comeback on the 50 year old thing by the way, 'you're wrong! 50 year olds ARE immature enough to think that another's behavior excuses their own!' I heartily concede defeat on that one TLC.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I damn sure can dismiss them just like I can dismiss professors, engineers, ex-cia, and scientists claiming that the WTC buildings were brought down by demolitions. They haven't provided compelling proof of their claim either. If you want to rely on a bunch of pronouncements and pontifications from authority figures as proof positive and a presentation of the facts, help youself. I can link you to the truther forum too, if you want. Seems right up your acceptance of facts alley.
Don't worry. I'm sure you'll be posting immature responses like the one directly above when you reach 50. It's in your blood. Of course, that assumes you live long enough by avoiding smacking the wrong 50 year old with a newpaper in the first place.Nice comeback on the 50 year old thing by the way, 'you're wrong! 50 year olds ARE immature enough to think that another's behavior excuses their own!' I heartily concede defeat on that one TLC.
Sure. It might not happen due to the fact that some very high placed Democrats could be indicted as well. Hurray for partisan politics.
That lunatic fringe is fueled greatly by partisan convictions, as I'm sure many of those in the concensus of the legal community are as well. That's not to mention that it's easy for people to make statements of political convenience based on the prevailing winds of public opinion. With the atmosphere surrounding the entire "TORTURE" row, few that saw things my way would have the nads to state their convictions to the public anyway. Political life and perception is often far more important to them than their personal convictions or beliefs, unfortunately. It's called being PC and it's nothing new.Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I damn sure can dismiss them just like I can dismiss professors, engineers, ex-cia, and scientists claiming that the WTC buildings were brought down by demolitions. They haven't provided compelling proof of their claim either. If you want to rely on a bunch of pronouncements and pontifications from authority figures as proof positive and a presentation of the facts, help youself. I can link you to the truther forum too, if you want. Seems right up your acceptance of facts alley.
Don't worry. I'm sure you'll be posting immature responses like the one directly above when you reach 50. It's in your blood. Of course, that assumes you live long enough by avoiding smacking the wrong 50 year old with a newpaper in the first place.Nice comeback on the 50 year old thing by the way, 'you're wrong! 50 year olds ARE immature enough to think that another's behavior excuses their own!' I heartily concede defeat on that one TLC.
Nice attempt to conflate a few people with credentials on the lunatic fringe with the consensus of the legal community and authoritative international organizations. This willful and pathetic attempt to discredit inconvenient information makes the rest of your posts make perfect sense.
No, I responded to a condescending ass that threatened to beat me with a newspaper, like a dog. I'm sure my son, who's probably close to your age, would agree with me 100% on that.
I guess it doesn't matter to you that there's a legal definiton in this country of torture and that a bunch of public proclamations from talking heads don't make for a solid legal case?
No, I said I "can only assume." It's certainly not from a lack of trying right now. If it happens that the Dems would rather try to shield their own then pursue this into court and take a risk, oh well. Wouldn't be the first time the Dems are just as guilty as those they accuse. Besides, there something called a presumption of innocence in this country. Unfortunately that hasn't prevented a number of people from already banging down their own gavel in the courthouse in their mind.
I'm talking about the core motivations of people and that applies to conspiracy nuts and lawyers alike. I'm not sure you're far enough along in life to recognize things like that though. You still seem to be stuck in the inexperienced belief that everything is black and white, exactly as you interpret it, and anyone that disagree is wrong. Don't worry, you'll get wiser (hopefully) and eventually move away from that sophomoric mindset that so seems to rule over you now.
All waterboarding is not equal. I've explained this thoroughly already but apparently it's too inconvenient for people to respond to, so they ignore it instead.
Yeah, that's exactly what I said.
US law is the only law that is binding in this case, in this country.
Actually, the legal arguments need to be crafted long before this ever gets in front of a judge.
Let me help you out, LL, since you really can''t seem to read:
Your responses are really getting more and more pathetic. You are really feeling this completely slip away, aren't you, because the desperation in your replies is readily apparent. Mercy needs to be invoked on you.
Facebook
Twitter