So I assume based on this you support the elimination of food stamps and medicaid so we cant stop the evil corporations from stealing our hard earned money.
Easy, businesses whose employees qualify for any form of public assistance must reimburse the government for the cost of that assistance. If their business model doesn't support paying a living wage, they can either change their business model or die so other, better structured businesses can take their place.
Because a vast number of Americans are greedy, short-sighted, and ignorant. They don't know nor do they care that taxpayers are subsidizing companies like Walmart. All they know is they can save an extra eight cents on their Chinese-made junk if they shop there.
So you're OK with taxpayers subsidizing companies like Walmart in order to give relief to the poor, even though this is a highly inefficient approach to welfare?
Nonsense. Someone will still be selling goods to all those people. If it's not Walmart, it will be a company with a more self-sufficient business model. It might result in a net decrease in goods sold since poor people might have to make choices and cut back. It's not going to substantially increase unemployment, and might actually increase it by returning to the "old days" of smaller, local merchants.
But he must enjoy paying for them. 
Facebook
Twitter