Chatter On With Aniti-Bush .... He will be Re-Elected

[Nick63]

I read the minutia in the posts here with the anti-Bush crowd hoping something might get him. To cut to the chase he will be the president till '08.

 

[Czar]

crystal ball?

 

[Witling]

Nick, we'll look for you in the fullness of time. Meanwhile, why don't you make your prediction your signature until after the election?

 

[Insane3D]

Well, since it is a given he will be re-elected, why don't we just do away with elections and just coronate him now?

 

[Gaard]

What is the purpose of this thread?

 

[Nick63]

I do not need to make it my signature. You will remember.

 

[DealMonkey]

Nick63? Did you fall down and hit your head? Or have you scryed the future by peeking at your own ass in the mirror?

 

[Czar]

sooo, you using a ball or do you read cards or what?

 

[DealMonkey]

Originally posted by: Czar
sooo, you using a ball or do you read cards or what?

More like fondling his own balls while making wild predictions.

 

[Nick63]

The Oracle told me..."He's The One"

 

[privatebreyer]

Well considering all the democratic canidates are either Flaming Liberal, puppets, or "Bush-Lites", I can't see any democrat up there that democrats can all stand behind. And since the nation is about 50-50 as it is, democrats are going to need all there 50 singing the same tune.

Its not looking good for them.

 

[DealMonkey]

Originally posted by: Nick63
The Oracle told me..."He's The One"

Did you have to travel to the machine city and lay down a few EMPs before they would tell you the future?

 

[Nick63]

Democrat candidates.....no crystal ball needed.

 

[Miramonti]

Just because most people aren't ignorant enough to be pro-bush, doesn't mean they have to be labeled as anti-bush.

 

[Nick63]

I find the majority of the critical assesments of Bush and his policies in the posts in this forum to be products of an "anti-Bush crowd." While it is likely true some here are not anti-Bush in their criticism the "label" fits most. Of course, I was not referring to you Jjsole.

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: privatebreyer
Well considering all the democratic canidates are either Flaming Liberal, puppets, or "Bush-Lites", I can't see any democrat up there that democrats can all stand behind. And since the nation is about 50-50 as it is, democrats are going to need all there 50 singing the same tune.

Its not looking good for them.

Sorry Gomer, the only Bush-lite is the one in the White House today (tastes great, less filling). Bush-lite isn't half the President Bush Sr. was, and that's not setting the bar terribly high.

Re. Nick63: Do Not Feed the Trolls.

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

It's John Titor!

 

[Nick63]

Bowfinger wrote:
"Re. Nick63: Do Not Feed the Trolls."

I have been a poster and user of Anands forums for quite a while and have never been called a troll and have never been one. This may have been my first post to the Politics forum and I do not seek trouble with the mods or any individuals including you Bowfinger. Being called a troll is serious in my book. If I have come across this way I am sorry. After reading so many of the posts in the list I wanted to bypass being called ignorant and stupid by what I perceive as the anti-Bush crowd because from what I read that is what is typically said or implied about those who defend a number of his controversial decisions and positions. I did realize some would not like what I posted, but I don't think it is improper to cut to the chase and get to the issue that uderlies a great deal of the debate here, and that is whether or not Bush is a capable President and whether the current political/econmic enviroment is forming into one which makes his re-election likely. I think that Bush will be re-elected.

 

[Nick63]

Accidental double post deleted.

 

[Ryan]

Honestly, if the economy makes a decent turnaround, he'll be back in office.

 

[Red Dawn]

The odds always favor the incumbent so this is no great revelation. Unoess there is some catostrophic downturn in the economies alleged recovery or Iraq beomes a bigger mess than it already is It doesn't look good for the non descript Dem Candidates running.

 

[NesuD]

As things stand today I have to agree with Nick. With the direction that the economy is apparently going (up) and the current Dem offerings penchant for foot in mouth disease I think GWB's reelection is very likely and won't even be close.