• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Charter Cable internet & Digital Cable for Free!

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: NedNeederlander
Jack Ripper, check out the Standard Plus Package: SBC DSL 1.5Mbps for $30

I have this and for most things its as good as being back in school w/ the T1. I've had cable before too and it suX0rs compared to DSL.

Yah, I called them and they wanted me to switch over to their Biz telly line @ 79.99 a month with all the packages that I want currently on my line that I pay 21.00 w/ tax... on top of that 79.99 plus biz DSL = $12x.xx which is a little steep... Thanks tho!
 
Get in on this deal, it's the only one you'll ever get from them.

4-year customer here dishing out over $100/mo and all I get is rate hikes, slow email service, internet outages, and multiple billing errors.
 
Get in on this deal, it's the only one you'll ever get from them.

Ouch I feel your pain indeed all cable companys go up like the tide. Sorry I just work here 😛

Send me A pm and mabye I'll make you happy 🙂 If your in Cal , Or or Washington....
 
Originally posted by: straubs
Originally posted by: RobK
what? you guys are nuts. this is a good deal. i'm moving to a charter area in a month and will absolutely use this. thanks OP.

Ouch. Soon you will feel my pain. :frown:
I recently moved from an area with TimeWarner RoadRunner, to an area with Charter Pipeline as the only option.

Boy, what a downgrade. 🙁

It's much MUCH slower to download linux ISOs (or anything big) from any server I tried, and the newsgroups are basically useless. RR's newsgroups were blazingly fast.

I used to have MediaOne in the NE (which later became, RR, TWAOLCable, AT&T, and is now Comcast, I think), anyways, their service was great, and so were their newsgroups. When it later changed hands to AT&T, it appeared that their DNS servers were overloaded, as there was significant delay finding web sites. I later moved. Recently, I subscribed to Verizon DSL, and while it sufffers from intermittent outages (probably a line problem, yet to be diagnosed or fixed, because I have yet to complain about it), it's decent, and at $35/mo after the promo ends, is cheaper than cable. Then again, with my line, I'm only getting 1.3Mb/s down, not the 1.5Mb/s that we are supposedly provisioned for. Plus, Verizon.net's newsgroups are pretty good, probably as good as MediaOne/RR's were.

Broadband internet access, without decent newsgoups, is worthless, IMHO. Usenet is one of the most useful, and most overlooked, features of "the internet", as well as being one of the oldest, save for e-mail and FTP maybe.
 
Originally posted by: knightc2
THey insist on charging an extra $10 a month if you don't have both packages
I believe this is a federal law that requires cable tv service before a cable company can provide auxillary services (ie. High speed internet.). They sent me a booklet on new policies and such and I remember reading something about needing to be a cable TV subcriber in order to subscribe to Pipeline.

Somehow I doubt that. When I had MediaOne and then RR in the NE, the subscription was only for cable internet access, no cable TV included. Granted, it would have cost not much more for basic cable + cable internet, vs. just the cable internet, but overall it was still cheaper, and no-one in the house watched TV. (Fancy that.) So, if there is a law, it must be very, very recent, within the last year or two.

I have a feeling that it isn't a law at all, it's just a fact of how most cable service plants operate. The most basic cable TV signals are not scrambled in any way, and once they run the lines to your premises, you automatically techincally have basic cable TV signals travelling over that wire too, even though you may not have the legal right to access or view those signals, since you haven't paid for basic cable TV service. There are a lot of people that apparently subscribed to cable internet, and then ran a splitter off of the signal, and then to their cable-ready teleivison set, which is all you really technically need. There is no way for the cable company to detect this illegal theft of services, in the normal way that they would, which is checkling to see if the premises is wired to the cable plant or not.

So most cable TV/internet service providers, now refuse to sell cable internet services without an accompanying basic cable TV service subscription as well, figuring that most people that order it, will also hook up the cable TV signal to view, whether it's legal or not. Basically, they assume that everyone with cable internet, is stealing basic cable TV, and thus make every cable internet subscriber also pay for basicl cable TV, assuming that they are stealing. Kind of like Canada's tax on CD-Rs, that goes to pop music-producing record labels, mostly.
 
Originally posted by: Maddscientist
Everybody has bad experiences but and its sad that you had a "service" lacking experience. I can truely say that if you would have talked to me just once, not only would you have gotten the credit that was due you but would have gotten off the phone at least partially satisfied. I know that some of the call centers out east are simply rude since our call center always wins all the rewards for customer service and always get the big bonuses for customer support...not to say we are perfect or anything of the sort but we come to work every day simply trying to serve the customer since that is what pays our wages in the first place. Hell just the other day I gave out over 435$ in credits and instead of a rebuke when I was called into my mangers office I recieved a plaque awarding me for scoring 10 perfect calls in a week. I kept expecting her to bring up the fact that I was way way over my credit limit she never said A word....again just my experience from my end I cant recall working for a better company and truely enjoy my work.

Sorry I didnt respond to any of you later but iv been pulling long hours at work making sure your all happy 😛 and pay for my sons birthday party coming up 🙂

I know that with my MediaOne/RR service contract, they agreed to give a pro-rated refund if the cable internet service was down for more than X hours. I never called them, because it was only down twice, and one of those was a few weeks after installation, some other cable truck came out and promptly disconnected us again. It seems that the work order to perform the disconnection of cable TV service for the prior occupant was never performed in a timely manner, and was instead executed after the service was started again at that location for a different set of tenants. Talk about one hand not talking to the other hand. Glad that they didn't file criminal charges against us for theft of service, like some other unlikely soul that only subscribed to cable internet, without cable TV. His story can be found on the internet somewhere. Very interesting read.

But what strikes me as very interesting, is that there is a "credit limit" for the service center to dish out. Apparently, it's not a "hard" limit, since you were able to go over it, but the fact that there is a limit at all is disconcerting, especially if Charter also contains a clause in the contract, offering pro-rated credit for service outages.

Honestly, put that up there with having to order cable TV as a prerequisite manditory service in order to recieve cable internet service from this company, and them asking for your SSN.. well, let's just say, thanks for helping me to NEVER choose Charter cable in the future. Not that I would anyways, but it's nice to have a reason.

What's really interesting is, unless the laws have changed recently, I don't think that the phone companies are *allowed* to even require that sort of service bundling. Then again, phone co's are regulated differently than cable co's. I can imagine if the phone co's were allowed to do such a thing, you would have to have both your local and long-distance service with them, before they would hook you up with DSL service. It's bad enough that they won't allow 3rd-party DSL service providers to utilize unbundled subscriber POTS loops, or ever bundled ones, if the baby bells get their way and shut out all 3rd-party DSL providers from their lines. The sad thing is that the justification for allowing this crap, is that phone (DSL) and cable internet providers "compete". Yeah, right, since they both have a local monopoly on their wires, and cable is far less regulared than the phone co's are.

I seriously hope that a bunch of wireless broadband providers spring up and are aggressive about gaining market share. I would sign up in a heartbeat to escape the local monopoly telecom and cable datacom providers.
 
Originally posted by: Creig
If you see a Comcast kiosk in your mall keep your eyes on the floor and walk quickly past. Do not talk and do not allow any eye contact until you are safely out of range.

LOL!

(remembering the shopping-mall scene from 'Minority Report')
 
Back
Top