Yeah, but I think it's seriously sad too. Because we know exactly how their political viewpoints are going to look in 30 or 40 years the same way we know how 65+ year old retirees today look when they talk about why the 1965 Civil Rights Act shouldn't have passed or how interracial marriage should have been left up to the states. As if states rights should ever extend that fucking far.
Pleaase see my sig. I am a very deep, sophisticated, and evolved individual and often leave simpler folk behind. I became that way becauyse I suffered alot when young, by accident or design, I have no idea, but, while I regret my ship can't sail in your shallow waters, I an glad you haven't had to feel my pain.
Men are denied marrying men, women are denied marrying women. Everyone is treated equally. Fail on your part.
Simly using standards I know you accept. Do you no longer accept these standards?
They said "stop saying what you are saying or we will stop you from doing business in our cities"...of course, we both know if he had said what the dems wanted to hear they would not be trying to abuse their power to punish him.
Thanks, but I would rather continue to ensure you do not pretend laws are not created to enfore religious institutions.
This is just about one of the most stupid statments I have read on this forum.
That might be an issue if there were groups of men demanding entry to women's rooms and groups of women demanding entry to men's rooms. AFAIK, there are not such groups because it would be retarded, just like you. If a man wants to go into a women's room, he can walk right in. He'd have to commit some other crime as well before law enforcement would get involved. On top of that, what would a man gain from using a women's room instead of a men's room? Nothing. Just a dumb ass attempt of false equivalence on your part.
In the case of Curves, it's not discrimination. Show me the group of men who really really want to be able to join Curves. I do believe that men's clubs and women's clubs should be able to restrict access based on sex. It doesn't harm anyone, unlike restricting same sex marriage. Just a dumb ass attempt of false equivalence on your part.
The reason men don't have the right to abort their offspring is because the fetus is not inside them. If you really think this is unjust, which I don't believe you do, too fucking bad. The Supreme Court says you are wrong. The reason men are not treated equally in this case is because they don't share equally in the risk. Everyone knows this. Just a dumb ass attempt of false equivalence on your part.
Produce a quote of me accepting this standard or admit you are lying. Those are your two choices in this case.
They did not say what you have quoted in bold. That is a blatent lie. You lost this one, you have to fabricate quotes to win your argument. Give it up already and put down the shovel.
Really? So what does my marriage mean to you? Inquiring minds want to know.
It depends on the state, most states do not allow discrimination based on gender for gyms.
No false equivalency found. The offspring is just as much his as hers...as proven by child support payments. You just do not want to hold an even standard of equality. That is understandable, most abortion supporters hold discriminatory views like yours.
They effectively said it. Ok, I will explain it in a way I know you understand:
Ah, you are playing the "I am going to change what I claimed" game and hope no one notices. You claimed this:
Now you are changing it to be "what is the meaning of my specific marriage"...which is not the same thing.
By the way, you used your sentence fragment improperly. It surely sucks to make a grammar mistake in the very post you show yourself to be a spelling Nazi, doesn't it?
Okay, I'll bite. My original statement from post # 94 was "Marriage only has meaning to the two people who are married and to no one else."
Facebook
Twitter