Originally posted by: rubix
it's pretty obvious kobe raped her, then lied to everyone and to his wife that he never even slept with her. then once he was forced to admit it with dna evidence he of course gave in and plees to a lesser charge. well now he still conveniently denies the rape charge though until he is forced to admit that. it never had to come to that though because he bullied her in and her imcompitent (sp?) lawyers into submission.
famous people and anyone who gets lots of coverage (and thereby get a bigname lawyer for cheap, like scott petterson) do this all the time. and they also throw out as many made up garbage stories as they can because they don't have to prove innocence, they have to instill any amount of doubt in the jurors. one moron juror may fall for one crappy story while another moron falls for another one. and i hope you all know how jurors are selected, the lawyers are allowed to select and reject them based on whatever reason they want.
the girl is obviously a nut job too and has little self value or morals and a drug problem etc, so she is really messed up, but so is kobe. he is guilty. he raped a girl. a crazy girl. throw them both in jail for all i care, but punish the guilty!
and don't forget trials and the law are so convoluted that it's not about who is right and wrong or what really happened... it's about who can put on the best show or create the most doubt (in the case of defense). all lawyers are not equal, just like any other job all the people are not equal in their particular field. there are good, bad and average types. kobe had better lawyers and they played dirty and smeared her relentlessly. what would happen if kobe was found guilty? what does that mean about their smears then? what kind of people does that make them to do that?
you are all messed up and should be ashamed with the names you use too. sickening.
