- Nov 20, 2005
- 14,612
- 318
- 126
Ok, rather than continue to hijack the SD card thread about removable batteries I thought that this issue is important enough to have its own thread.
I honestly am offended by the concept that "opportunistic charging" is the answer for non-removable batteries. The base assumption here is that everyone is always surrounded by either a sea of easily accessible wall outlets or usb ports. Maybe during a lot of your normal days when you are at home or at work at a desk this might be case (for those who work at desks!), but I have long argued that removable batteries are best for the random odd days a year when you are away from the outlets. For example, when you are traveling or doing outdoor activities.
I personally feel that not having the option to replace the battery leads to people doing what I would call "charging unfortunately," which happens every time a smartphone user has a long phone call sitting on the ground next to a wall.
And the evidence proves my theory correct:
http://www.techlicious.com/blog/do-you-need-your-tablet-or-laptop-to-have-a-good-vacation/
So if half of travelers are having to compromise for power, isn't the ability to swap out the power source the most obvious solution until every device has some magic 3 day battery life?
It might make people more considerate. From the same source:
I honestly am offended by the concept that "opportunistic charging" is the answer for non-removable batteries. The base assumption here is that everyone is always surrounded by either a sea of easily accessible wall outlets or usb ports. Maybe during a lot of your normal days when you are at home or at work at a desk this might be case (for those who work at desks!), but I have long argued that removable batteries are best for the random odd days a year when you are away from the outlets. For example, when you are traveling or doing outdoor activities.
I personally feel that not having the option to replace the battery leads to people doing what I would call "charging unfortunately," which happens every time a smartphone user has a long phone call sitting on the ground next to a wall.
And the evidence proves my theory correct:
Almost half of travelers (46 percent) and 63 percent of young travelers admit compromising their personal comfort and hygiene to find a power source to keep their device charged. This means people are choosing a restaurant or coffee house based on outlet availability, looking for outlets in public restrooms (yuck!), as well as trading comfort and hygiene to sit on the floor near an outlet.
http://www.techlicious.com/blog/do-you-need-your-tablet-or-laptop-to-have-a-good-vacation/
So if half of travelers are having to compromise for power, isn't the ability to swap out the power source the most obvious solution until every device has some magic 3 day battery life?
It might make people more considerate. From the same source:
Thirteen percent of young travelers admit to "hogging" an available power source.