Throckmorton
Lifer
I don't get what you're trying to dispel. It's a fact that K&N flows more dirt. It's a fact that dirt is bad for an engine. It's a fact that the job of an air filter is to filter air.
You are trying to argue that the letting in 45 times as much dirt doesn't harm the engine, but really the only thing you can say for a fact is that in your particular location, in your truck, your motor oil (which itself runs through a filter) has normal levels of impurities with a K&N filter.
If anything you should be trying to dispel the common misconception that K&N is universally better than paper filters, when in reality the only thing it's good at is lowering restriction, which has no net benefit except at WOT, and is actually much much much worse at filtering.
Buy a Ford with a Cummins diesel, run a K&N, and when your engine dies, try to get it serviced by Ford. After they tell you the warranty was voided by running a K&N, you can go back and read the terms, and then kick yourself in the butt repeatedly.
You are trying to argue that the letting in 45 times as much dirt doesn't harm the engine, but really the only thing you can say for a fact is that in your particular location, in your truck, your motor oil (which itself runs through a filter) has normal levels of impurities with a K&N filter.
If anything you should be trying to dispel the common misconception that K&N is universally better than paper filters, when in reality the only thing it's good at is lowering restriction, which has no net benefit except at WOT, and is actually much much much worse at filtering.
Buy a Ford with a Cummins diesel, run a K&N, and when your engine dies, try to get it serviced by Ford. After they tell you the warranty was voided by running a K&N, you can go back and read the terms, and then kick yourself in the butt repeatedly.