They're all out. They all need to run for re-election.Any guesses on who's out in the states that lost house seats? I don't have any favorites either way, just curious.
No way to know. Basically what will happen is the state legislature, if controlled by one party, will look to combine two districts held by the other party. Then those two get to fight it out in the primary and whoever loses gets the boot.Any guesses on who's out in the states that lost house seats? I don't have any favorites either way, just curious.
Thank you. I was unclear how it worked and not having a lot of luck with DDG.No way to know. Basically what will happen is the state legislature, if controlled by one party, will look to combine two districts held by the other party. Then those two get to fight it out in the primary and whoever loses gets the boot.
Aren't all the districts going to be redrawn for the most part? Would it even be legal to combine the two highest population districts into one? Don't the districts need to represent similar population counts?No way to know. Basically what will happen is the state legislature, if controlled by one party, will look to combine two districts held by the other party. Then those two get to fight it out in the primary and whoever loses gets the boot.
Yes, they will all be redrawn and have to be of roughly similar population. I guess it would be more accurate to say you’ll end up with two reps of the out party who have substantial portions of their old districts combined in a way that makes so they will be likely to run in a primary against each other.Aren't all the districts going to be redrawn for the most part? Would it even be legal to combine the two highest population districts into one? Don't the districts need to represent similar population counts?
One of the many issues involved with entering any country without proper documentation is the possibility of getting caught and removed. Most people involved in the process will take measures to avoid being identified.Irony in CA, the decrease may be an illusion. Yes, lots of people have moved to other states but the largest demographic in CA is guess what??? Latinos. What percent of those are undocumented and were intimidated by the anti-immigration wall-enthralled Trump adminstration into not getting counted?
The T administration pushed hard to get people to have to reveal their status on census forms. CA will have a lot of unrepresented residents.One of the many issues involved with entering any country without proper documentation is the possibility of getting caught and removed. Most people involved in the process will take measures to avoid being identified.
That's pretty much the crux of the matter. Do people who entered the country illegally have a right to representation at the Federal level? Should they have a voice in how the country is run? I would say no.The T administration pushed hard to get people to have to reveal their status on census forms. CA will have a lot of unrepresented residents.
They don’t have a voice in how the country is run because they can’t vote. The Constitution is very clear that all persons must be included in the census though. Not all citizens, all people. There is no wiggle room.That's pretty much the crux of the matter. Do people who entered the country illegally have a right to representation at the Federal level? Should they have a voice in how the country is run? I would say no.
And it still comes back to a whole bunch of people that want to stay under the radar. They don't want to have contact with any government agency, even if there is a promise of no action taken because of it.They don’t have a voice in how the country is run because they can’t vote. The Constitution is very clear that all persons must be included in the census though. Not all citizens, all people. There is no wiggle room.
So I guess if people wanted to amend the constitution to change how apportionment works they could try that but…good luck.
And it still comes back to a whole bunch of people that want to stay under the radar. They don't want to have contact with any government agency, even if there is a promise of no action taken because of it.
They don’t have a voice in how the country is run because they can’t vote. The Constitution is very clear that all persons must be included in the census though. Not all citizens, all people. There is no wiggle room.
So I guess if people wanted to amend the constitution to change how apportionment works they could try that but…good luck.
which fear was completely preyed upon by the trump admin trying to get the citizenship question added.And it still comes back to a whole bunch of people that want to stay under the radar. They don't want to have contact with any government agency, even if there is a promise of no action taken because of it.
I wonder if the Trump team would do an immigration raid a week or so, before canvasing certain areas. Wouldn't put it past them.An issue in certain immigrant communities is an ingrained distrust of government officials.
To those who are bit on the stupid side, what this means is that those who are here legally will avoid filling out census forms. They will avoid interacting with people who appear to be acting in official capacity. They will avoid answer the door to people not from the neighborhood or that do not look like them. ESPECIALLY after a period where the federal government as well as local officials demonized people based on race and origin.
That's pretty much the crux of the matter. Do people who entered the country illegally have a right to representation at the Federal level? Should they have a voice in how the country is run? I would say no.
That's pretty much the crux of the matter. Do people who entered the country illegally have a right to representation at the Federal level? Should they have a voice in how the country is run? I would say no.
