• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Censored

dualsmp

Golden Member
Some of these stories have had little media attention, while some of them have actually gained some traction in the media such as the Blackwater debacle.

#24 The "Wiped off the Map" quote seems to get repeated over and over by the mainstream media even though it has been proven utterly false.. I know I'm with the terrorists.. :roll:

Ohh, also attack the sources since we all know only Wolf Blitzer, the Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post are only news media in the whole wide world who have access to the truth. Alternative media be damned right?

This is an abbreviated version. You can find the full version here.

Project Censored?s 2008 list:

1. No Habeas Corpus for ?Any Person?

The Military Commissions Act of 2006 ushered in military commission law for U.S. citizens and non-citizens alike. It allows for the institution of a military alternative to the civilian justice system for ?any person? arbitrarily deemed to be an enemy of the state.

One section of the act is specifically directed at American citizens: ?Any person subject to this chapter who, in breach of an allegiance or duty to the United States, knowingly and intentionally aids an enemy of the United States, or one of the co-belligerents of the enemy, shall be punished as a military commissioner under this chapter may direct.?

As Parry pointed out, American citizens are the ones most likely to have an allegiance or duty to the United States.

? Robert Parry, Consortium, Oct. 19, 2006.

2. Bush Moves Toward Martial Law


The John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007 allows the president to deploy military troops anywhere in the United States and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities in order to ?suppress public disorder ... as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, ... terrorist attack or incident.?

This law essentially nullifies the Posse Comitatus Act, signed into law in 1878, which restricts military involvement in domestic enforcement. The new law also grants the military the right to round up protesters, illegal aliens, and ?potential? terrorists and grants the Pentagon $532.8 billion to implement it.

? Frank Morales, Oct. 26, 2006, in Toward Freedom, a self-described progressive internet site that features news stories and editorials.

3. AFRICOM: U.S. Military Control of Africa?s Resources

In February 2007 the White House announced the formation of the US African Command (AFRICOM), a unified Pentagon command center in Africa. Presented as a humanitarian guard in the global war on terror, the real objective, according to Sen. Leahy and other critics, is procurement and control of Africa?s oil and its global delivery systems. Activists in the Niger Delta region have been clamoring for self-determination and an equitable share of oil profits for decades, and their tactics have shifted from petition drives to attacks on pipelines. AFRICOM?s ostensible goal is to ?stabilize? the region, thereby ending local resistance.

? Bryan Hunt, Feb. 21, 2007, in www.MoonofAlabama.org, a political, economic, and philosophical discussion site that features news articles and blogs.

4. Increasingly Destructive Trade Agreements

The U.S. and European Union are vigorously pursuing trade and investment agreements outside the auspices of the World Trade Organization, agreements that Oxfam officials believe are increasingly exploitative toward developing countries and will result in unprecedented loss of livelihood, displacement of population, and degradation of human rights and environments. The U.S. and E.U. are demanding unprecedented tariff reductions in these agreements, to allow them to dump subsidized agricultural goods from their economies on underdeveloped countries, plunging local farmers into poverty.

?Sanjay Suri, March 2, 2007, for the Inter Press Service News Agency, an independent news agency primarily focused on global issues.

5. Enslaved Workers Building U.S. Embassy in Iraq

The enduring monument to U.S. liberation and democracy in Iraq is being built by forced labor, according to interviews and documents obtained by reporter David Phinney. Contractors working for the U.S. State Department are using bait-and-switch recruiting practices to smuggle Asian workers into brutal and inhumane labor camps in the middle of Beirut?s U.S.-controlled Green Zone.

First Kuwait Trading and Contracting is one of many contractors that have benefited from the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. The company had employed about 7,500 foreign laborers, 3,000 of whom are from South Asia. One of that company?s practices is to force foreign laborers to surrender their passports to company officials until the work is completed.

? Phinney, CorpWatch, Oct. 17, 2006.

6. Operation FALCON Raids

Under Operation FALCON ? for ?Federal and Local Cops Organized Nationally? ? more than 30,000 ?fugitives? were arrested in one of the largest dragnets in the nation?s history, between April 2005 and October 2006. More than 960 state, local and federal agencies were directly involved in the effort to round up the ?worst of the worst? fugitives, with an emphasis on sex offenders.

There was plenty of local news coverage on the raids themselves, but few if any reports on who the fugitives were and what became of them.

? Brenda J. Elliot, Sourcewatch, Nov. 18, 2006.

7. Behind Blackwater Inc.

Blackwater, the most powerful mercenary firm in the world, embodies the privatization of the military-industrial complex. Bush?s contracts with Blackwater have allowed the creation of a private army of more than 20,000 soldiers, operating with almost no oversight or effective legal constraints, to deploy in nine countries, mostly on behalf of the U.S. government, and to aggressively expand its presence inside U.S. borders.

More recently, Blackwater has been back in the news after one of its convoys was accused of killing Iraqi civilians, and the Iraqi government requested that the company be tossed out of the country. So far, the U.S. government hasn?t agreed to that, but did significantly reduce the firm?s security role.

? Jeremy Scahill, Jan. 26, 2007, in Democracy Now!, an award-winning independent radio news program airing on more than 450 stations in North America and with a strong online presence.

8. KIA: The U.S. Economic Invasion of India

The Knowledge Initiative in Agriculture, quietly signed by Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, trades local control of India?s agricultural sector for U.S. nuclear technology. The United States agreed to send nuclear fuel shipments for civilian use, allowing India?s existing nuclear fuel to be used for military purposes. In return, the Indian government has resurrected an old colonial law to allow it to grab privately owned land and give it to U.S companies, which are fast putting Indian companies and farmers out of business.

The KIA is allowing St. Louis-based Monsanto to move in on India?s agricultural sector, while opening the door for India?s trade sector to be dominated by agribusiness giants ADM and Cargill and opening its retail sector to takeover by Wal-Mart.

According to Democracy Now!, as many as 28,000 Indian farmers have committed suicide over the last decade as a result of debt incurred from failed genetically mutated crops and over-competition with the subsidized crops of American corporations.

? Vandana Shiva with Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!, Dec, 13, 2006.

9. Privatization of America?s Infrastructure

More than 20 states have enacted legislation allowing public-private partnerships to build and run highways. Americans will soon be paying Wall Street investors, Australian bankers, and Spanish contractors for the privilege of driving on American roads.

Despite a relative lack of attention to this issue nationally, in Texas it has received extensive coverage, in large part because of the Trans-Texas Corridor, a project pushed by Gov. Rick Perry that would create a network of huge toll road corridors at a price of $184 billion, including $1.2 billion paid to Cintra-Zachry, a Spanish building company that stands to collect on the toll roads.

? Daniel Schulman with James Ridgeway. Mother Jones, Feb. 2, 2007

10. Vulture Funds Threaten Debt Relief for Poor Nations

?Vulture funds? is the term used for companies that buy up the debt of poor nations cheaply, when they are about to be written off, and then sue for the full value of the debt plus interest, which might be ten times what the countries received originally. Otherwise known as ?distressed-debt investors,? these companies profit from plunging impoverished nations into crippling debt.

In 1999, Romania had agreed to reduce the debt owed to them by Zambia, a poor African country, from $40 million to $3 million. The deal was killed when the English company Donegal International convinced the Romanian government to sell the debt for $4 million. Donegal then sued Zambia for the full $40 million. English courts ruled that Zambia ? where the average wage is $1 a day ? has to pay at least $15 million.

? Greg Palast with Meirion Jones for BBC Newsnight, Feb. 14, 2007.

11. The Scam of ?Reconstruction? in Afghanistan

Much of the U.S. tax money earmarked to rebuild Afghanistan actually ends up going no further than the pockets of wealthy U.S. corporations ? 86 cents of every dollar, according to Action Aid, a watchdog organization. Paychecks for overpriced and often incompetent American ?experts? under contract to USAID go directly from the agency to American bank accounts. Of the aid that does make it to the recipient country, 70 percent is ?tied? to the donor nation ? requiring that the recipient use the donated money to buy products and services from the donor country, often at drastically inflated prices

? Ann Jones, Aug. 27, 2006, in www.Tomdispatch.com, a project of the Nation Institute, a progressive-minded news organization.

12. Another Massacre in Haiti by U.N. Troops

On Dec. 22, 2006, more than 30 unarmed Haitian civilians, including women and children, were killed by indiscriminate gunfire from United Nations ?peacekeeping? forces, reportedly as collective punishment for a massive demonstration days earlier calling for the return of President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, who fled the country amid a rebellion.

Film footage recorded by the Haiti Information Project, a humanitarian organization, shows an unidentified man dying as he describes being shot from a circling U.N. helicopter. The group also has video of a teenaged boy shot by U.N. forces, who, before he dies, explains how the U.N. opened fire on unarmed civilians.

? Haiti Information Project, Haiti Action, Jan. 21, 2007

13. Immigrant Roundups to Gain Cheap Labor for U.S. Corporate Giants

In the wake of 9/11, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has conducted raids and roundups of undocumented immigrants under the rubric of preventing terrorism. The real goal, according to union activists and others, is to replace the current immigrant work force in this country with a tightly regulated, exploitive guest-worker program. This practice is endorsed by companies seeking low-wage workers through a lobby group called Essential Worker Immigration Coalition, whose 52 members include Wal-Mart, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Marriott, and Tyson Foods. The program has resulted in the roundup of 13,000 undocumented workers.

? Laura Carlsen, Foreign Policy in Focus, Feb. 23, 2007

14. Impunity for U.S. War Criminals

A last-minute adjustment to the Military Commission Act of 2006 redefined torture, removing the harshest definition of war crimes and exempting perpetrators from prosecution for such offenses dating back to November 1997. The source of this provision, however, is a mystery. The White House denies any involvement or knowledge regarding the insertion of that language.

? Jeff Stein, Congressional Quarterly, Nov. 22, 2006

15. Toxic Exposure Can Be Genetically Transmitted to Future Generations

Research suggests that behavior and environmental conditions may program sections of future generations? DNA. New evidence about how genes interact with the environment suggests that many industrial chemicals may be more dangerous than previously thought. One researcher predicted a revolution in medicine: ?You aren?t eating and exercising just for yourself, but for your lineage.?

? Peter Montague, Rachel?s Democracy & Health News, Oct. 12, 2006

16. No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11

Osama bin Ladin?s role in the events of 9/11 is not part of his profile on the FBI?s ?Ten Most Wanted? list. Six years later an FBI spokesman explained, ?The reason 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden?s ?Most Wanted? page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11 ... .?

? Ed Haas, June 6, 2006, in Muckraker Report, an online independent watchdog site.

17. Drinking Water Contaminated by Military and Corporations

Corporations, cities, and the U.S. military are using America?s waters as their dumping ground ? often with little or no accountability. The average major water purification facility discharges pollutants at nearly four times the legal limit, while more than 40 percent of American waterways are unsafe for swimming and fishing,

? Sunny Lewis, Environment News Service, March 24, 2006.

18. Mexico?s Stolen Election

U.S. interests were significantly invested in the outcome of Mexico?s 2006 presidential election in which overwhelming evidence revealed massive fraud by the eventual victor, according to the human rights organizations Civic Alliance and Global Exchange.

The Mexican government owns and controls that nation?s oil and gas industry via Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX), the fifth largest oil company in the world, which exports 80 percent of its oil to the United States. President Felipe Calderon has pushed to remove barriers to foreign investments, which would allow even more foreign control of that industry.

? Chuck Collins and Joshua Holland, AlterNet, Aug. 2, 2006.

19. People?s Movement Challenges American Economic Control

In Latin America, massive opposition to U.S. economic domination is building. Populist leaders and parties are taking control of some national governments, building powerful alternatives to the exploitation caused by the same laissez-faire attitudes that prevailed during the Great Depression.

? American Friends Service Committee, Trade Matters, May 3, 2006.

20. Terror Act Against Animal Activists

The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act of 2006 expanded the definition of ?terrorism? to include acts that interfere, or promote interference, with the operation of an animal enterprise. More than 160 groups opposed this act on grounds that its wording is dangerously vague and poses major conflicts to the U.S. Constitution. Under this law, First Amendment-protected activities such as demonstrations could be ruled illegal.

? David Hoch and Odette Wilkens, Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, March 9, 2007

21. U.S. Seeks Immunity for Illegal Farm Payments

The July 2006 World Trade Organization negotiations, held in Doha, Qatar, broke down over the contentious issue of farm trade and the unrestricted opening of markets to agricultural products. In a last-minute proposal, not included on the original agenda, the United States insisted that all trade agreements include a special ?Peace Clause? that would make its use of illegal farm subsidies immune from prosecution.

? Eoin Callan, Financial Times, Jan. 9, 2007.

22. North ?Invades? Mexico

The number of North Americans living in Mexico has soared from 200,000 to 1 million (one-quarter of all U.S. expatriates) in the past decade. With more than 70 million American baby-boomers expected to retire in the next two decades, experts predict a tidal wave of migration. The land rush is sending property values zooming, to the detriment of locals whose children are consequently driven into slums or forced to emigrate north.

? Mike Davis, www.TomDispatch.com, Sept. 19, 2006.

23. Feinstein?s Conflict of Interest in Iraq

U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California is involved in monumental conflicts of interest as she promotes and exploits the global war on terror. As a member of the Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee, she voted for spending billions of dollars with her husband?s military construction firms, while consistently voting to fund U.S. military proliferation.

? Peter Byrne, Jan. 24, 2007, in North Bay Bohemian, a newspaper in Santa Rosa, Calif.

24. News Reports Misquote Threat From Iran?s President

A mistranslated quotation attributed to Iran?s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, which threatened that, ?Israel must be wiped off the map,? has been spread around the world. Ahmadinejad?s actual statements, however, were significantly less threatening. The Iranian president didn?t actually refer to Israel, but rather to the Israeli government. Iran?s foreign minister tried to clear up the statement, but the quote took on a life of its own.

? Arash Norouzi, Global Research, Jan. 20, 2007.

25. Who Will Profit From Native Energy?

The U.S. government and energy industry intend to shift this country away from dependence on foreign energy by deregulating and stepping up development of wind and solar resources on American Indian reservations ? another form of exploitation of the tribes, according to the Indigenous Environmental Network, an environmental activist group.

? Brian Awehali, Lip Magazine, June 5, 2006.
 
These stories may not hit home with people directly, but another one will. How about private companies like Enron being allowed to buy up public water utilities.
Just wait a few years and $5 a gallon gas wont seem much compared to $5 a gallon water charges. $10 or $15 everything you flush your tortie? OUCH!

Theres a video I've not seen but its out there called THIRST. Has a lot about this issue, especially in California where its becoming a big issue. (soon coming to a local town near you i.e. your water utility going private) Trading water on the stock market? Oh well, the world is suppose to end in 2012...
 
Originally posted by: randym431
These stories may not hit home with people directly, but another one will. How about private companies like Enron being allowed to buy up public water utilities.
Just wait a few years and $5 a gallon gas wont seem much compared to $5 a gallon water charges. $10 or $15 everything you flush your tortie? OUCH!

Theres a video I've not seen but its out there called THIRST. Has a lot about this issue, especially in California where its becoming a big issue. (soon coming to a local town near you i.e. your water utility going private) Trading water on the stock market? Oh well, the world is suppose to end in 2012...

This is why its great to be a Republican. I've got my own private water supply, the cost is only the electricity to run the pump, salt for the softner, and the semi-annual replacement of my reverse osmosis filters--about 10 bucks a month total. Only silly Demoncrats will pay $5/gallon for water. I'm fixin' to appropriate my own private clean air system next, because I'm invested heavily in nasty polluters........but it's all good cause I'm making a fortune. Portability of the system may prove troublesome, but I'm sure the free market will sort that out eventually. Gotta go, need to harvest a few babies for the dinner table.
 
Originally posted by: randym431
These stories may not hit home with people directly, but another one will. How about private companies like Enron being allowed to buy up public water utilities.
Just wait a few years and $5 a gallon gas wont seem much compared to $5 a gallon water charges. $10 or $15 everything you flush your tortie? OUCH!

Theres a video I've not seen but its out there called THIRST. Has a lot about this issue, especially in California where its becoming a big issue. (soon coming to a local town near you i.e. your water utility going private) Trading water on the stock market? Oh well, the world is suppose to end in 2012...

Yes privatization of water utilities could be abridged in with #9.. Before you know it will cost $10 in tolls to drive down to the local supermarket, and you'll have to think long and hard before washing your car, let alone flushing the toliet. 😱
 
Yeah, dualsmp, keep posting this cr*p.
You're not gonna like it in Guantanamo.

Oh yeah. Stop your lies about the lack of water. There is enough water in California for 40 million people. However, it is clearly more important to use it for crops than for humans.


/sarcasm
 
Originally posted by: techs
Yeah, dualsmp, keep posting this cr*p.
You're not gonna like it in Guantanamo.

Oh yeah. Stop your lies about the lack of water. There is enough water in California for 40 million people. However, it is clearly more important to use it for crops than for humans.


/sarcasm

No one is saying there is a lack of water Mr. Guantanamo. The private corps are going to own the water and charge you plenty for it. Got it slave?
 
Originally posted by: dualsmp
The "Wiped off the Map" quote seems to get repeated over and over by the mainstream media even though it has been proven utterly false

sorry, but when "wiped off the map" statement comes after denying the holocaust, it doesn't come off well no matter the intentions

 
Originally posted by: daveymark
Originally posted by: dualsmp
The "Wiped off the Map" quote seems to get repeated over and over by the mainstream media even though it has been proven utterly false

sorry, but when "wiped off the map" statement comes after denying the holocaust, it doesn't come off well no matter the intentions

Yeah, but Achmiiiigugiaoidfhd (sp?) has about as much power in Iran as, say, a "respected" member of the religious right here in America(about the only power he has is to hold a conference, have you ever heard of anything he has actually done as President?). And no one threatens war just cause some American preacher says we should kill all the muslims.
 
Project Censored has a history as an ?extreme left-leaning? group.

Even other left wing groups have criticized it because of this.
 
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Project Censored has a history as an ?extreme left-leaning? group.

Even other left wing groups have criticized it because of this.

That's PJ's favorite tactic. Attack the source, then call them a bunch of left wingers. That way it diminishes the debate to an ad hominum attack, and at the same time he feels justified at ignoring all the information. Also notice he labels it the extreme left. Nice touch.

Thanks for stopping by with your insightful comment PJ.

Hear no evil, see no evil.
 
Originally posted by: dualsmp
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Project Censored has a history as an ?extreme left-leaning? group.

Even other left wing groups have criticized it because of this.

That's PJ's favorite tactic. Attack the source, then call them a bunch of left wingers. That way it diminishes the debate to an ad hominum attack, and at the same time he feels justified at ignoring all the information. Also notice he labels it the extreme left. Nice touch.

Thanks for stopping by with your insightful comment PJ.

Hear no evil, see no evil.

As usual, PJ hits the nail squarely on his thumb. But also like usual, he's managed to contain a small grain of truth inside the monumental pile of bullshit. The problem with these groups isn't that they are "left-leaning" (PJ, have you EVER met a left of center group you liked?), it's that they are too busy sensationalizing to try to figure out the real story. There are certainly things worth worrying about going on in the world, but leaping off into the crazy pit doesn't help.
 
Originally posted by: dualsmp
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Project Censored has a history as an ?extreme left-leaning? group.

Even other left wing groups have criticized it because of this.

That's PJ's favorite tactic. Attack the source, then call them a bunch of left wingers. That way it diminishes the debate to an ad hominum attack, and at the same time he feels justified at ignoring all the information. Also notice he labels it the extreme left. Nice touch.

Thanks for stopping by with your insightful comment PJ.

Hear no evil, see no evil.

Thats what people like you want to believe in order to attempt to lend credibility to this extremely left leaning article!!
 
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Thats what people like you want to believe in order to attempt to lend credibility to this extremely left leaning article!!

Go figure out who Ron is first, and I'll get back to ya.

 
Originally posted by: dualsmp
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Project Censored has a history as an ?extreme left-leaning? group.

Even other left wing groups have criticized it because of this.

That's PJ's favorite tactic. Attack the source, then call them a bunch of left wingers. That way it diminishes the debate to an ad hominum attack, and at the same time he feels justified at ignoring all the information. Also notice he labels it the extreme left. Nice touch.

Thanks for stopping by with your insightful comment PJ.

Hear no evil, see no evil.

Well seen as you're the biggest conspiracy theorist here outside of Dave, we're not inclined to believe anything you trot out.
 
22. North ?Invades? Mexico

The number of North Americans living in Mexico has soared from 200,000 to 1 million (one-quarter of all U.S. expatriates) in the past decade. With more than 70 million American baby-boomers expected to retire in the next two decades, experts predict a tidal wave of migration. The land rush is sending property values zooming, to the detriment of locals whose children are consequently driven into slums or forced to emigrate north.

? Mike Davis, www.TomDispatch.com, Sept. 19, 2006

Someone needs to tell Mike Davis that Mexico is part of North America. :laugh:
 
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Project Censored has a history as an ?extreme left-leaning? group.

Even other left wing groups have criticized it because of this.

ProfJohn's proof the world is flat:

The project censored team says the world is not flat. They are an extreme left-leaning (oops, let me add the single quotes for vauge menace, 'extreme left-leaning') group.

QED.

Project Censored is a wonderful group who puts out all kinds of important stories given too little media attention. Perfect record? Hardly - who cares, the point is many are great.
 
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Well seen as you're the biggest conspiracy theorist here outside of Dave, we're not inclined to believe anything you trot out.

:thumbsup:

Another fact-filled post from Pabster and his side.
Who knows where that thumbs been?:shocked:
 
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Well seen as you're the biggest conspiracy theorist here outside of Dave, we're not inclined to believe anything you trot out.

:thumbsup:

Another fact-filled post from Pabster and his side.

Yes exactly...Ad hominum attacks.. I expect more cheerleaders to show up before it's over.

So far there have been two replies with any substance. Yawn.
 
Back
Top