- Jun 3, 2012
- 4,102
- 0
- 0
depends on whether you have a video card with hardware offload.
I had issues with a 2.85Ghz Athlon X2.
Edit: def not 3D.
motherboard doesn't support anything over the Pentium D"Well I just physically removed my ATI 4650 card and installed the
Gigabyte GT220..with 1 Gb DDR3 RAM....in my main HTPC.
Went to the Geforce download area and got the latest Win7(x86) drivers
and installed them...
Rebooted and VOILA!.. it came up 1920x1080(60Hz)..with my Sony 116cm LCD!
I played some 720p and 1080p mkvs...
then some 720p..50Hz..interlaced stuff
then my usual test DVD thru TMT3..with SimHD ...it looked great!"
http://www.avsforum.com/t/1193027/anyone-have-nvidia-gt220-in-htpc
as for the CPU, really not sure about that one, but this doesn't bode well:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-charts-2007,1644-21.html
if CPU doesn't cut it, maybe look for cheap upgrade options without having to upgrade the motherboard
http://ark.intel.com/products/27115/Intel-Celeron-D-Processor-331-256K-Cache-2_66-GHz-533-MHz-FSB
It is a celeron d single core prescott. I don't think it will work judging by the chart zcypher posted.
Even if your board only supports Pentium D - if the CPU turns out to be the only thing holding you back from smooth playback, maybe there is a better Pentium D you could drop in there that would do the trick, just a thought.
Well, I do have recent experience computing on Pentium 4s and their Celeron derivatives(still use it as a secondary rig). As mentioned before, your CPU is a Celeron D. That means no dual core and gimped caches. The "D" for these Celeron is just there to distinguish Prescott Celerons from their previous Netburst Celeron brethren.
I have a Socket 478 Celeron D 2.53 Ghz that I pulled out. I overclocked the Celeron up to maybe 2.7ish to improve performance from godawful to slightly less godawful. I replaced it with a less crappy but still crappy 3.2 Ghz Pentium 4 Prescott with Hyperthreading (should have gotten a Northwood, but w/e). I don't have a video card, though.
Celeron Ds suck without a GPU, and I don't even know if those old GPUs can handle 1080p. If they do, I think the Celerons would be a bottleneck.
Basic computing on it was a chore and the integrated GPU on the northbridge will not handle 1080p. I had to overclock the FSB to get some relief for basic computing. Loading Google Maps took an eternity on the Celeron. The Pentium 4 that replaced could handle 480p video and script heavy sites like Google Maps, but I really, really doubt 1080p will work. The chips suck.
An actual Pentium D 9xx probably would indeed do the trick according to that tomshardware link. Prices vary at Ebay.
gaming yes but HD video playback there evenThe Tom's Hardware test used a 8800GTX card, which actually more powerful than the GT 520 or GT 220.
http://www.google.com/search?q=gtx+...eebef04f804023d&bpcl=39967673&biw=820&bih=870
http://www.google.com/search?q=gtx+...eebef04f804023d&bpcl=39967673&biw=820&bih=870
The answer to the OP is No. I had a 3.2Ghz Pentium 4 Prescott and it could barely handle 720p videos in VLC by itself. However, with a GPU that offers offloading, it should work fine.
