Oh great ones of endless computer knowledge, I have a question. I have just built a CUSL2 system with a 966 mhz P3 computer. I have been asked to build 3 systems for friends/family. Graphics speed isn't that much of an issue, but cost is. I want to build something reasonably fast, that can do most things other than play quake at 100 FPS. My logic is to get the CUSL2 board with onboard video. This will cut my cost down dramatically. I was thinking of going with a A7V + a Geforce 256 card, but that is going to cost about $100 more going that route. I know the duron is faster than the celeron, but 10% speed isn't worth the extra money when a Video card will have to be purchased seperately. I really don't want to go with a video card that I can't count on for stability or driver support, so the 3dfx cards aren't that attractive especially due to rebates to get a good deal. Overclocking may be an option to squeeze out a little extra, but the heat normally generated by the Duron's will keep that to a minimum unless I go with the celeron. I don't want to build room heaters. I have put together a CUSL2 system, so I know where the bugs are. Please give me some input. So far I have gone back and forth in my mind three times
Is it worth the extra $100 to go with a duron based system over a celeron based system at teh same clock speed is what I'm asking I guess.
