Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Small planes get better gas mileage than you would think. I don't know about jets, but a twin engine 4 seater gets about something like like 15mpg. If two people are in it, that's 30mpg per person. I'd assume that a small jet with a comparable number of people delivers similar mpg per person.
Edit: http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/06/hondajet_to_att.html
The hondajet gets 39.36 seat miles per gallon (6 seats). An sj30 returns 22.5 seat miles per gallon (7 seats). A learjet 31a returns 24.9 seat miles per gallon (8 seats). That is a pretty phenomenal improvement in efficiency.
Yeah, seat mpg makes them seem better than they are, but do celebrities usually fly around alone in their jets? In any case, that jet or piston plane isn't going 20,000 miles a year like your 9mpg Hummer H2.
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: sm8000
I wonder if TMZ takes into account that when these people are flying, it's probably work-related.
Even so they dont HAVE to fly private jets that have a whole 3 or 4 people in them.
No one needs to fly a private jet.
If you read the entire article, Leo flies commercial, why can't the rest of the so-called Hollywood green? It is very hypocritical of them to be preaching when they themselves needlessly fly private jets.
Small planes get better gas mileage than you would think. I don't know about jets, but a twin engine 4 seater gets about something like like 15mpg. If two people are in it, that's 30mpg per person. I'd assume that a small jet with a comparable number of people delivers similar mpg per person.
Edit: http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/06/hondajet_to_att.html
The hondajet gets 39.36 seat miles per gallon (6 seats). An sj30 returns 22.5 seat miles per gallon (7 seats). A learjet 31a returns 24.9 seat miles per gallon (8 seats). That is a pretty phenomenal improvement in efficiency.
Yeah, seat mpg makes them seem better than they are, but do celebrities usually fly around alone in their jets? In any case, that jet or piston plane isn't going 20,000 miles a year like your 9mpg Hummer H2.
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Originally posted by: BobDaMenkey
I don't disagree that it's somewhat hypocritcal, however there are legitimate reasons for it I think.
There's also legitimate reasons for people to own SUVs and pick-up trucks.
There is no legitimate reason to own some SUVs like the Hummer H2... small interior, mediocre off road ability, and it's enormous-- 8000lbs right? I'd say most people who drive full size trucks in Texas do not need them and don't use them for what they were built. I technically don't need my Jeep-- I'd get by with a BIG wagon and a roof rack, but I use it to its full capabilities regularly.
Originally posted by: MX2times
Wow, that wasnt even remotely interesting
Agreed.Originally posted by: eits
lame...
and by that, i mean this thread is lame. celebs have jets... jets need fuel... they don't fly around in them all the time. this is a pointless point.
