Originally posted by: Goi
Taiyo Yuden stuff are the best. Mitsubishi dyes are good too, especially the Sonic-AZO and Super-AZO stuff. Prodiscs are ok too and are generally cheaper.
Originally posted by: Ken90630
Has any computer magazine or Web site ever tested discs? I've never seen any, but then I've only been 'into computers' for a couple years. I'd be interested to read some test reports if anyone knows of a link or magazine reference.
Thanks for the detail. Very helpful! My own concern is to copy audio CD's for the most part. Sure, I do copy installation CD's and reliability (lasting reliability) can be just as important as for audio CD's. I copy all my audio CD's if for no other reason than to add CD Text, which is a supreme rarity in audio CD's, at least for the ones I get. All my CD players support CD Text and I have a 300 disk changer and a 60 disk changer and keeping track of things without CD Text is difficult. Besides, it provides the wonderful advantage of being able to see track titles, either already on the display or with the press of a button. I usually find myself wondering when I want to make a CD Text supporting CDR copy of an audio CD just how long that disk is apt to last. That's why I want to buy media that's recommended for long-term reliability.Originally posted by: Tostada
Most brands these days have both good and bad media. It's best just to get TY that says TY, not Fuji that you hope will be TY.
TY (both 8X -R and +R) is $26 for a 50-pack at Rima and cheaper the more you get. I can't think of any justification for getting worse media when the best is so cheap. I've used Ritek G03s and G04s that were supposed to be great stuff. Never burned a coaster, but after a two years of sitting around many of my G03s are dead, and even some of the newer G04s are getting read errors. There's stuff that I worked on very hard and burned on Verbatim discs that was unreadable 2 years later, too.
Get some TY discs and flex them a little bit. They're more rigid than anything else I've seen. Look at the dye and the way they're bonded together. TY is just 100% better quality than any of the other stuff I've seen.
EDIT:
OK, nevermind. I'm an idiot. CD-Rs are different. Get whatever's cheap.
If you really want to archive stuff, DVD-Rs are cheaper per MB. Are you talking about just burning audio CDs? Any CD-Rs around will generally last a long time, but audio CDs aren't really the best way to archive stuff. You don't want to have to be super careful with things you're taking with you and tossing around your car. If you want a backup of legit CDs, rip them with EAC and encode them with FLAC, then you'll be able to fit about 15 CDs with lossless compression on one DVD-R and keep it in a safe place. If you're just talking about MP3s, the same thing goes. If you want something really secure get QuickPar or the newest WinRAR and make recovery data for your backups.
Originally posted by: Ken90630
Has any computer magazine or Web site ever tested discs? I've never seen any, but then I've only been 'into computers' for a couple years. I'd be interested to read some test reports if anyone knows of a link or magazine reference.
I would guess that the quality of the burner, and also the speed the discs are burned at, would affect disc performace on at least some level. Using cheapy burners from unremarkable companies that claim to burn discs at 52X speed is prolly not a recipe for data/disc integrity, no matter what media you feed it.![]()
Originally posted by: DN
I got some 4x Mitsumi DVD-R's at Futureshop and my LG 4040B will only burn on them at 2x.. Very frustrating since I bought 100 of them.. Yes, I do have the latest firmware installed..![]()