CBS News: 66% cannot name a Democratic Pres. Candidate

[DukeFan21]

Text

 

[UltraQuiet]

That's because there isn't one. What are they up to now? Nine dwarves? Ten?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Over 60% of Democrats in that poll couldn't name a candidiate.

 

[Red Dawn]

Does it rhyme with Dubya? The Dems need a good pupeteer like the Republicans have.

 

[flavio]

66% of the people don't think much about elections until the last minute.

 

[BDawg]

In order to see that number in the proper light, I wonder how many people know who the current president is. In addition, I wonder how many people can name a Republican Presidential Candidate.

 

[Zebo]

Al Sharpton I know you're scared now muahahaha

 

[JellyBaby]

But I bet they can tell you the locations of every Nike Outlet Store in the tri-county area!

 

[Zebo]

Originally posted by: JellyBaby
But I bet they can tell you the locations of every Nike Outlet Store in the tri-county area!

LOL Or who the finalists are on American Idol.

We really do get what we deserve.

 

[UltraQuiet]

Originally posted by: flavio
66% of the people don't think much about elections until the last minute.

"But people will continue to avoid current issues and make excuses for Democrats by pointing elsewhere. It's just too difficult to address the issue at hand."

You were saying?

 

[flavio]

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: flavio
66% of the people don't think much about elections until the last minute.

"But people will continue to avoid current issues and make excuses for Democrats by pointing elsewhere. It's just too difficult to address the issue at hand."

You were saying?

That's not really making much sense now is it?

 

[UltraQuiet]

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: flavio
66% of the people don't think much about elections until the last minute.

"But people will continue to avoid current issues and make excuses for Democrats by pointing elsewhere. It's just too difficult to address the issue at hand."

You were saying?

That's not really making much sense now is it?

It's making perfect sense. I replaced one word in one of your posts from another thread and this is what we have. You do the same thing you accuse others of doing.

Ironic but hardly surprising.

 

[Vadatajs]

Originally posted by: Carbonyl

Originally posted by: JellyBaby
But I bet they can tell you the locations of every Nike Outlet Store in the tri-county area!

LOL Or who the finalists are on American Idol.

We really do get what we deserve.

Yeah politics is boring, wars are fun.

 

[sMiLeYz]

Hell I dont know who I'm voting for either, but take a guess (pssst it's not republican)...

 

[Siddhartha]

It is too early in the process. The current "candidates" have to make throught NH and Idaho before I start paying attention.

 

[Anubis]

i cant name one either.

but i also couldent tell you anything about the war in Iraq. I dont watch TV

 

[IGBT]

Al Sharpton..the only REAL demo in the bunch...he looks great in a purple suit.

 

[Spyro]

Originally posted by: IGBT
Al Sharpton..the only REAL demo in the bunch...he looks great in a purple suit.

Never thought of that......

 

[TheShiz]

Originally posted by: flavio
66% of the people don't think much about elections until the last minute.

well, over 50% do not even vote, so I would bet about 60% of the total pop really doesn't give a sh!t like me.

 

[flavio]

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: flavio
66% of the people don't think much about elections until the last minute.

"But people will continue to avoid current issues and make excuses for Democrats by pointing elsewhere. It's just too difficult to address the issue at hand."

You were saying?

That's not really making much sense now is it?

It's making perfect sense. I replaced one word in one of your posts from another thread and this is what we have. You do the same thing you accuse others of doing.

Ironic but hardly surprising.

What's hardly surprising is your lack of reading comprehension. I didn't "point elsewhere" but directly at a probable cause for the poll results.

You're going to have to read better.

 

[UltraQuiet]

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: flavio
66% of the people don't think much about elections until the last minute.

"But people will continue to avoid current issues and make excuses for Democrats by pointing elsewhere. It's just too difficult to address the issue at hand."

You were saying?

That's not really making much sense now is it?

It's making perfect sense. I replaced one word in one of your posts from another thread and this is what we have. You do the same thing you accuse others of doing.

Ironic but hardly surprising.

What's hardly surprising is your lack of reading comprehension. I didn't "point elsewhere" but directly at a probable cause for the poll results.

You're going to have to read better.

Wrong. You made up a bullshit number in order to deflect the demoidiots continuing inability to put forth any viable candidates or ideas.

Your gonna have to try harder.

 

[NightTrain]

Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
It is too early in the process. The current "candidates" have to make throught NH and Idaho before I start paying attention.

I think you mean Iowa.

 

[flavio]

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: flavio
66% of the people don't think much about elections until the last minute.

"But people will continue to avoid current issues and make excuses for Democrats by pointing elsewhere. It's just too difficult to address the issue at hand."

You were saying?

That's not really making much sense now is it?

It's making perfect sense. I replaced one word in one of your posts from another thread and this is what we have. You do the same thing you accuse others of doing.

Ironic but hardly surprising.

What's hardly surprising is your lack of reading comprehension. I didn't "point elsewhere" but directly at a probable cause for the poll results.

You're going to have to read better.

Wrong. You made up a bullshit number in order to deflect the demoidiots continuing inability to put forth any viable candidates or ideas.

Your gonna have to try harder.

You made up a bullshit reason in order to explain the poll results ->"no viable candidates or ideas". I'm sure you would like to ignore the fact that 50% of the population doesn't even vote and the majority that do don't seriously consider candidates until the election is around the corner....whatever, do you have any facts to back up your ridiculous theory?

So anyway, you were saying something about me "pointing elsewhere"?

 

[ConclamoLudus]

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: flavio
66% of the people don't think much about elections until the last minute.

"But people will continue to avoid current issues and make excuses for Democrats by pointing elsewhere. It's just too difficult to address the issue at hand."

You were saying?

That's not really making much sense now is it?

It's making perfect sense. I replaced one word in one of your posts from another thread and this is what we have. You do the same thing you accuse others of doing.

Ironic but hardly surprising.

What's hardly surprising is your lack of reading comprehension. I didn't "point elsewhere" but directly at a probable cause for the poll results.

You're going to have to read better.

Wrong. You made up a bullshit number in order to deflect the demoidiots continuing inability to put forth any viable candidates or ideas.

Your gonna have to try harder.

You made up a bullshit reason in order to explain the poll results ->"no viable candidates or ideas". I'm sure you would like to ignore the fact that 50% of the population doesn't even vote and the majority that do don't seriously consider candidates until the election is around the corner....whatever, do you have any facts to back up your ridiculous theory?

So anyway, you were saying something about me "pointing elsewhere"?

I believe the poll was among registered voters.

 

[UltraQuiet]

You made up a bullshit reason in order to explain the poll results ->"no viable candidates or ideas". I'm sure you would like to ignore the fact that 50% of the population doesn't even vote and

I'm ignoring nothing. From the article:

"A majority also believes that the Republican party has a clear plan for the country - 53 percent say they do - while only 40 percent think the Democrats have a clear plan for the nation."

"With still almost a year to go before the primaries, the Democratic candidates for President are not yet well-enough known for most respondents to volunteer any of their names. Only 34 percent of people can offer the name of at least one of those challengers - including only 36 percent of Democrats who say they can."

No viable candidates. No plan for the country. Next:

the majority that do don't seriously consider candidates until the election is around the corner . . . whatever, do you have any facts to back up your ridiculous theory?

Just provided them for you. How about you? Got any facts to back up your BS? Numbers? Poll data?

Didn't think so.

 

[flavio]

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

You made up a bullshit reason in order to explain the poll results ->"no viable candidates or ideas". I'm sure you would like to ignore the fact that 50% of the population doesn't even vote and

I'm ignoring nothing. From the article:

"A majority also believes that the Republican party has a clear plan for the country - 53 percent say they do - while only 40 percent think the Democrats have a clear plan for the nation."

"With still almost a year to go before the primaries, the Democratic candidates for President are not yet well-enough known for most respondents to volunteer any of their names. Only 34 percent of people can offer the name of at least one of those challengers - including only 36 percent of Democrats who say they can."

No viable candidates. No plan for the country. Next:

the majority that do don't seriously consider candidates until the election is around the corner . . . whatever, do you have any facts to back up your ridiculous theory?

Just provided them for you. How about you? Got any facts to back up your BS? Numbers? Poll data?

Didn't think so.

You didn't back up your BS at all. I see nothing backing up "no viable candidates" and "clear plan for the country" is a very small difference in the poll considering we have an incumbant vs. a slew candidates a year from the primaries. What's really surprising is that only 53% think the incumbant has a clear plan.

I think this backs up my theory just fine...

From the article:

With still almost a year to go before the primaries

Now what were you saying about me pointing elsewhere?