caveman diet(raw paleo)

Naer

Diamond Member
Nov 28, 2013
3,392
174
106
I'm adopting some of this. just today, I seared the very outer part of porkchops and ate it mostly raw. I feel good about it. I used a knife and dipped it in this [

cooking just changes the molecular makeup of your food. I feel good after eating raw. almost euphoric
 

ControlD

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2005
5,440
44
91
I bet cavemen died from trichinosis as well. Or least they wish they were dead when they had it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chocu1a

cbrunny

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 2007
6,791
406
126
caveman paleo.. yeah that makes sense. I bet you think that because no other animals drink milk from other animals that somehow that's bad too, right? gotta be a vegan because horses don't have fingers to milk a friggin cow.

I don't mean to be a dick but this caveman paleo is complete garbage. You know what else they didn't have in the paleo era? Hospitals. Doctors. the friggin Internet. Lightbulbs - unnatural light is bad for your eyes because cavemen! turn off the screen!

Complete garbage. Cook your food. We have brains that have learned about science and have taught us things that pigs and donkeys don't understand. Eat like a human.
 

BW86

Lifer
Jul 20, 2004
13,114
30
91
Picture of OP:

s2vM4Ng.jpg
 

SlitheryDee

Lifer
Feb 2, 2005
17,252
19
81
I feel like the paleo diet is probably pretty good for people who want to lose weight and build muscle. It allows for tons of protein and fats, while mostly eliminating carbs. That will usually result in weight loss for the average person, and if you're lifting simultaneously it should help with that as well. I don't see any point in eating anything raw though. There's just nothing to be gained there IMO. There needs to be a reason for everything you do in a diet. High protein and fat with few carbs has a definite and readily evident beneficial aspect. Undercooking things doesn't. To me that means it's probably garbage that people latched onto thinking that if a paleo diet was good, then taking it to the extreme would have to be even better. It isn't.

Some of my favorite recipes are apparently paleo compliant. Kalua pork for instance is some seriously good stuff. It doesn't appeal to me to adhere to any specific kind of diet though. I like sweets way too much for that. So called "flexible dieting" serves me much better. The two numbers I worry about most are calories and grams of protein, after that I try to keep fat and carbs as balanced as I can. This is better for me because I can still achieve all my goals while maintaining much better adherence to the diet than I could with a stricter system. I can actually "cheat" without cheating, for instance. I can eat literally anything at any time so long as I keep track of it and make it balance out in the long run. Binges, no matter how egregious, are never seen as insurmountable irrecoverable breaches of my diet. It's just better for me.
 

Aristotelian

Golden Member
Jan 30, 2010
1,246
11
76
Primal (Mark Sisson - google) is much more pleasant. Why eat meat raw when cavemen knew how to use fire as well? While the idea behind Primalism is something that I adhere to I am not going to give up a comfortable bed (which cavemen didn't really have) or the use of fire (which they did), or brushing my teeth etc, and I'm pretty sure that giving up these things isn't what was meant by paleo. For what it's worth since there is already a post about lots of protein/fat - I like the primal idea because there's a focus on eating large quantities of healthy vegetables. Even the allowance to skip protein at some meals (I mean, Grok didn't always hunt successfully).