• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Catholic Cardinal calls the election of Obama "Apocalyptic"

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Is a preemptive war against a nation that has no means of attacking your country a just one? I'm sorry, but your reasoning fails on too many levels. Try again
Which orifice of your body did you pull this from? Please show me where I stated anything about justifying a preemptive war. Please show me how my reasoning (which isn't even mine, since I borrowed it from some of the greatest philosophers in history) is flawed. Try again.
War hawks DO exist, there were many (particularly in the Bush administration and around the country) who were pushing for the Iraq War despite the evidence. You're ignorant if you think otherwise. There was a lot of bullshit being claimed at the time, and it was the warhawks trying to spread misinformation like the faux link between Al Queda and Saddam Hussein. If you don't call it pro-war, what do you call it? Is it willing deception of the public for no reason?

Did you write that post after major surgery or something? It's drivel. To cite Just War Theory (which is 99% of the time misunderstood) while completely ignoring the facts that the Iraq War was completely unjust is sheer LUNACY.
You are an illiterate idiot. Learn to read, then get back to me. :cookie:
 
Back
Top