Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
It makes more sense than carrying concealed gold.
Originally posted by: George P Burdell
Where's the "I'm 22-30 and I couldn't care less" option?
If you don't mind, I'd like to hear more, I imagine there is a story or two that would go along with that. I'm also curious what constitutes a legitimate need.I am over 30 and can understand why people carry, but in my experience most people who carry do so due to their own feelings of inadequacy rather than any legitimate need.
Originally posted by: Flyback
While it is possible to live in a dangerous area, carrying a gun seems like an unwanted burden and I'd quickly try and figure out what's wrong with my own life that I wouldn't want to take better care of myself and move somewhere more hospitable. That would include upgrading my education and finding a better, higher-paying job.
You're working on the assumption that crime only happens in the bad part of town? Don't criminals want to take things from people with the money to actually have nice things? How about if I am trying to upgrade my education, say sitting at virginia tech, in a class room and someone starts shooting? I think tv and movies have kind of led us to believe that bad things only happen in the bad part of town or to bad people and thats kind of what I'm looking to see demonstrated in this poll. As people get older, do they see more of the bad things in the world and realize there is no safe zone where they won't be victims because they paid $1k a month in rent?Originally posted by: Flyback
While it is possible to live in a dangerous area, carrying a gun seems like an unwanted burden and I'd quickly try and figure out what's wrong with my own life that I wouldn't want to take better care of myself and move somewhere more hospitable. That would include upgrading my education and finding a better, higher-paying job.
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
I am over 30 and can understand why people carry, but in my experience most people who carry do so due to their own feelings of inadequacy rather than any legitimate need.
Originally posted by: Soybomb
If you don't mind, I'd like to hear more, I imagine there is a story or two that would go along with that. I'm also curious what constitutes a legitimate need.Originally posted by: DVC
I am over 30 and can understand why people carry, but in my experience most people who carry do so due to their own feelings of inadequacy rather than any legitimate need.
The problem I see with that though is criminals don't just go after people with large amount of cash. They go after anyone for their wallet or their car, anyone just because they're crazy and want to hurt people, young women for an easy rape target, etc. Aren't the bad things that happen everyday to good people all the reason a person needs? You're unlikely to need a gun going to college, but if you were sitting in a VT class room that day you might have needed one even if you were the local amateur boxing champion. Would the situation have been made worse if one of those students had been armed?Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Originally posted by: Soybomb
If you don't mind, I'd like to hear more, I imagine there is a story or two that would go along with that. I'm also curious what constitutes a legitimate need.Originally posted by: DVC
I am over 30 and can understand why people carry, but in my experience most people who carry do so due to their own feelings of inadequacy rather than any legitimate need.
I have a client who owns a residential contracting company. He routinely works in bad neighborhoods and carries large amounts of cash. Although he can handle himself (he is 6'2", and 265 pounds, and has a black belt), he carries. I get that.
Most people I have known who carried, though, are, for lack of a better phrase, paranoid geeks. They carry because, in my view, they know they can't fight, and they elect to see the world as a scary and dangerous place.
To each his own, but in my view (and I am a handgun owner who has been robbed at knifepoint), carrying a gun is a significant burden 99.999% of the time, and likely to add to the danger of most situations, rather than reducing it, since the bad guys have an easier time pulling the trigger than you or me (I am reminded of a member of the Glock Talk forum, which I used to frequent - he was killed when he pulled a gun and tried to interrupt a liquor-store robbery). My own view is that if there's no particular reason to carry, it's worse than worthless.
You must remember, though, that carrying CCW doesn't mean you have to interfere; many off-duty officers in that situation may not interfere either, even with training/etc. Unless someone's life is in imminent danger, you're probably best off being a good witness.To each his own, but in my view (and I am a handgun owner who has been robbed at knifepoint), carrying a gun is a significant burden 99.999% of the time, and likely to add to the danger of most situations, rather than reducing it, since the bad guys have an easier time pulling the trigger than you or me (I am reminded of a member of the Glock Talk forum, which I used to frequent - he was killed when he pulled a gun and tried to interrupt a liquor-store robbery). My own view is that if there's no particular reason to carry, it's worse than worthless.
Originally posted by: Soybomb
The problem I see with that though is criminals don't just go after people with large amount of cash. They go after anyone for their wallet or their car, anyone just because they're crazy and want to hurt people, young women for an easy rape target, etc. Aren't the bad things that happen everyday to good people all the reason a person needs? You're unlikely to need a gun going to college, but if you were sitting in a VT class room that day you might have needed one even if you were the local amateur boxing champion. Would the situation have been made worse if one of those students had been armed?
Originally posted by: Soybomb
The problem I see with that though is criminals don't just go after people with large amount of cash. They go after anyone for their wallet or their car, anyone just because they're crazy and want to hurt people, young women for an easy rape target, etc. Aren't the bad things that happen everyday to good people all the reason a person needs? You're unlikely to need a gun going to college, but if you were sitting in a VT class room that day you might have needed one even if you were the local amateur boxing champion. Would the situation have been made worse if one of those students had been armed?
I'm in my 20s and unlikely to have health problems but have health insurance. My house probably won't burn down but I get home owners insurance. I probably won't be in a car wreck but I wear a seat belt. Why if I slip a few ounces of metal in my pocket do I turn into a paranoid geek who can't fight versus taking a small but reasonable precaution against an unlikely event with high stakes like I am with the others?
Originally posted by: tfinch2
I'm 22-30 and I can understand why people would