Car that runs on water invented.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Gibson486

Lifer
Aug 9, 2000
18,378
2
0
create more energy from less voltage? Hmmmm...that would make my current engineering project solved....maybe I will get a pink slip on Monday....
 

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,313
7
81
Stuff like this shows up from time to time. The inventors usually end up dead, disappear, or thrown in jail for one reason or another.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,658
13,833
126
www.anyf.ca
Stuff like this shows up from time to time. The inventors usually end up dead, disappear, or thrown in jail for one reason or another.

Yea it's sad how harsh the industry is towards advancement in the name of money. Seems the minute someone has something good they vanish and their invention is never heard of again. Kinda makes you wonder for sure.

This particular one is kinda sketchy though.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,877
10,688
147
Stuff like this shows up from time to time. The inventors usually end up dead, disappear, or thrown in jail for one reason or another.

It takes more energy to separate the hydrogen to create his fuel than there is energy to be used in the fuel he creates.

If I spend $20 to create a new $10 bill for you to spend, would you consider that a new and brilliantly sustainable source of money?
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Bulllllllllll shiiiiiiiiiit.

If it's like the water rockets that boys played with in the 60s it could be possible. Of course they were jealous when I could make them go higher by pumping harder...

:eek:

:D
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,877
10,688
147
If it's like the water rockets that boys played with in the 60s it could be possible. Of course they were jealous when I could make them go higher by pumping harder...

:eek:

:D

Oh, Ruby! I don't think the boys minded how hard you could pump at all, especially if spouting higher was the result. ;) :p
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,448
47,826
136
If it's like the water rockets that boys played with in the 60s it could be possible. Of course they were jealous when I could make them go higher by pumping harder...

:eek:

:D


And pray tell, was this done with one, or two hands? Also, just for the sake of scientific posterity, what were you wearing during said pumping?

C'mon Ruby. This is for science.



The real question: how does this break thru compare to North Korea's fusion advances or their gnarly super drink?
 
Last edited:

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Sometimes it isn't a conspiracy. Sometimes it just isn't feasible.

The electric car died in the past because gas was just too cheap to make people pay the extra cost for the cars.

There are lots of advances made in battery tech every month, the super polymer batteries are one such battery that is sold right now. The other is prismatic batteries, batteries that use the old format of stacking cells like in C, D, or even lead acid car batteries are not efficient for lithium cells and prismatic cells fix that by placing the cells into layers that fit the cell best not by making the cell fit a container size. Prismatic cells also don't have a fire or venting problem because the cells are not confined to a container.
structure.jpg
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Water's awesome: Combine hydrogen and oxygen, get energy. Split hydrogen and oxygen, get energy. Why has no one thought of this before???

:hmm:



Then of course there's water's excellent memory, which allows us to have homeopathic medicine. :awe:
 

zoiks

Lifer
Jan 13, 2000
11,787
3
81
I saw some news on this. They guy said that they've been approached by different auto companies but they want to create the industry themselves.
If true, then I wish them luck.
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
And pray tell, was this done with one, or two hands? Also, just for the sake of scientific posterity, what were you wearing during said pumping?

C'mon Ruby. This is for science.

Two hands - one on the shaft and the other on the ball (handle) to push in and out. Simple physics at work here. ;)

IIRC I was wearing dungarees and a leather jacket because it was cold. Even still those things spray *everywhere* when they "go off" but boy do they soar! :D
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,386
32
91
If I spend $20 to create a new $10 bill for you to spend, would you consider that a new and brilliantly sustainable source of money?

Not really a good analogy since money is only a medium of transfer, not wealth itself. Making a $10 bill doesn't create $10 in wealth, it creates a symbol by which one can transfer $10 in wealth. That symbol can be used over and over, and its value is determined by how needed it is and how much better it is than competing, available products.
A $10 bill costs 10 cents to produce as it is, and that doesn't include the costs of removing worn currency out of circulation. If spending $20 would give you a bill that lasts 200 times longer in circulation then it could actually make financial sense to go that route. But as people are short-sighted and greedy and so the people of the present don't usually like to foot the bill so their great-great-grandchildren can coast, such a super-bill would likely be deemed "too costly" even if it was the smart thing for the nation to do.
 

nismotigerwvu

Golden Member
May 13, 2004
1,568
33
91
You know that's what they said about the electric car. It was claimed that the big oil and car companies were in on a vast conspiracy to suppress any advancement and implementation of electric vehicles, yet the battery issues that plague the electric vehicle also affect essentially any piece of electronics that isn't plugged into a wall. We still haven't made significant advancements in battery tech -- minus some recent carbon/graphene talk that's still several years away at least.

Sometimes it isn't a conspiracy. Sometimes it just isn't feasible.

I wouldn't say this sort of thing is a conspiracy, it's just that the system is rigged to maintain the status quo. Between subsidies favoring currently implemented tech over alternative (look no further than Romney already stating he would completely eliminate wind power subsidies) and a critical underfunding for other alternative projects, you can understand why so little has changed.
 

tcG

Golden Member
Jul 31, 2006
1,202
18
81
I wouldn't say this sort of thing is a conspiracy, it's just that the system is rigged to maintain the status quo. Between subsidies favoring currently implemented tech over alternative (look no further than Romney already stating he would completely eliminate wind power subsidies) and a critical underfunding for other alternative projects, you can understand why so little has changed.

There are other things that work to suppress alternative energy technology as well. The scientific research itself isn't as unbiased as people think it is. Most of the money from energy research comes from the companies making all the money off the status quo, or the government.