Capitol Police arrest Cindy Sheehan

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Sheehan nor the Congressman's wife should've been arrested or removed ...

Unlike the grounds surrounding the Capitol, which historically have been the site of
numerous demonstrations, there has been a ban on demonstrations inside the Capitol since 1946 when
Congress decreed: ?It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly -- .
. . to parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.? 40 U.S.C. § 193f(b)(7). The
United States Capitol Police are responsible for enforcing this ban. 40 U.S.C. § 212a. Believing that
the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a ?demonstration,? the
United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets ?demonstration activity? to
include:
parading, picketing, speechmaking, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other
expressive conduct that convey a message supporting or opposing a
point of view or has the intent, effect or propensity to attract a crowd of
onlookers, but does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or
other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.
Link

dude you just got the other thread locked so why repeat your post here?

it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them.

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Sheehan nor the Congressman's wife should've been arrested or removed ...

Unlike the grounds surrounding the Capitol, which historically have been the site of
numerous demonstrations, there has been a ban on demonstrations inside the Capitol since 1946 when
Congress decreed: ?It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly -- .
. . to parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.? 40 U.S.C. § 193f(b)(7). The
United States Capitol Police are responsible for enforcing this ban. 40 U.S.C. § 212a. Believing that
the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a ?demonstration,? the
United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets ?demonstration activity? to
include:
parading, picketing, speechmaking, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other
expressive conduct that convey a message supporting or opposing a
point of view or has the intent, effect or propensity to attract a crowd of
onlookers, but does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or
other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.
Link

dude you just got the other thread locked so why repeat your post here?

it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them.

Hmm... could it be that the other thread was a repost?

So shutup.

Why should she? She wasn't breaking any Capitol building rules. Plus, I don't believe the CHP's account of what happened, because Rep. Young doesn't believe them either.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Sheehan nor the Congressman's wife should've been arrested or removed ...

Unlike the grounds surrounding the Capitol, which historically have been the site of
numerous demonstrations, there has been a ban on demonstrations inside the Capitol since 1946 when
Congress decreed: ?It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly -- .
. . to parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.? 40 U.S.C. § 193f(b)(7). The
United States Capitol Police are responsible for enforcing this ban. 40 U.S.C. § 212a. Believing that
the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a ?demonstration,? the
United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets ?demonstration activity? to
include:
parading, picketing, speechmaking, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other
expressive conduct that convey a message supporting or opposing a
point of view or has the intent, effect or propensity to attract a crowd of
onlookers, but does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or
other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.
Link

dude you just got the other thread locked so why repeat your post here?

it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them.

Hmm... could it be that the other thread was a repost?

So shutup.

"shutup".... nice. 😕

going for lock #2?

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Sheehan nor the Congressman's wife should've been arrested or removed ...

Unlike the grounds surrounding the Capitol, which historically have been the site of
numerous demonstrations, there has been a ban on demonstrations inside the Capitol since 1946 when
Congress decreed: ?It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly -- .
. . to parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.? 40 U.S.C. § 193f(b)(7). The
United States Capitol Police are responsible for enforcing this ban. 40 U.S.C. § 212a. Believing that
the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a ?demonstration,? the
United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets ?demonstration activity? to
include:
parading, picketing, speechmaking, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other
expressive conduct that convey a message supporting or opposing a
point of view or has the intent, effect or propensity to attract a crowd of
onlookers, but does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or
other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.
Link

dude you just got the other thread locked so why repeat your post here?

it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them.

Hmm... could it be that the other thread was a repost?

So shutup.

"shutup".... nice. 😕

going for lock #2?

Yes, I said shutup with your lies.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Sheehan nor the Congressman's wife should've been arrested or removed ...

Unlike the grounds surrounding the Capitol, which historically have been the site of
numerous demonstrations, there has been a ban on demonstrations inside the Capitol since 1946 when
Congress decreed: ?It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly -- .
. . to parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.? 40 U.S.C. § 193f(b)(7). The
United States Capitol Police are responsible for enforcing this ban. 40 U.S.C. § 212a. Believing that
the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a ?demonstration,? the
United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets ?demonstration activity? to
include:
parading, picketing, speechmaking, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other
expressive conduct that convey a message supporting or opposing a
point of view or has the intent, effect or propensity to attract a crowd of
onlookers, but does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or
other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.
Link

dude you just got the other thread locked so why repeat your post here?

it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them.

Hmm... could it be that the other thread was a repost?

So shutup.

"shutup".... nice. 😕

going for lock #2?

Yes, I said shutup with your lies.

what lies?

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Sheehan nor the Congressman's wife should've been arrested or removed ...

Unlike the grounds surrounding the Capitol, which historically have been the site of
numerous demonstrations, there has been a ban on demonstrations inside the Capitol since 1946 when
Congress decreed: ?It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly -- .
. . to parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.? 40 U.S.C. § 193f(b)(7). The
United States Capitol Police are responsible for enforcing this ban. 40 U.S.C. § 212a. Believing that
the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a ?demonstration,? the
United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets ?demonstration activity? to
include:
parading, picketing, speechmaking, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other
expressive conduct that convey a message supporting or opposing a
point of view or has the intent, effect or propensity to attract a crowd of
onlookers, but does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or
other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.
Link

dude you just got the other thread locked so why repeat your post here?

it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them.

Hmm... could it be that the other thread was a repost?

So shutup.

"shutup".... nice. 😕

going for lock #2?

Yes, I said shutup with your lies.

what lies?

Do you short-term memory problems?

"dude you just got the other thread locked "

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Sheehan nor the Congressman's wife should've been arrested or removed ...

Unlike the grounds surrounding the Capitol, which historically have been the site of
numerous demonstrations, there has been a ban on demonstrations inside the Capitol since 1946 when
Congress decreed: ?It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly -- .
. . to parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.? 40 U.S.C. § 193f(b)(7). The
United States Capitol Police are responsible for enforcing this ban. 40 U.S.C. § 212a. Believing that
the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a ?demonstration,? the
United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets ?demonstration activity? to
include:
parading, picketing, speechmaking, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other
expressive conduct that convey a message supporting or opposing a
point of view or has the intent, effect or propensity to attract a crowd of
onlookers, but does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or
other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.
Link

dude you just got the other thread locked so why repeat your post here?

it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them.

Hmm... could it be that the other thread was a repost?

So shutup.

"shutup".... nice. 😕

going for lock #2?

Yes, I said shutup with your lies.

what lies?

Do you short-term memory problems?

"dude you just got the other thread locked "

you did. how about keeping this one open by staying on topic instead of trying to win an argument on the internet.

btw.. you telling me to "shut up". where is my free speech? 😛

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Sheehan nor the Congressman's wife should've been arrested or removed ...

Unlike the grounds surrounding the Capitol, which historically have been the site of
numerous demonstrations, there has been a ban on demonstrations inside the Capitol since 1946 when
Congress decreed: ?It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly -- .
. . to parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.? 40 U.S.C. § 193f(b)(7). The
United States Capitol Police are responsible for enforcing this ban. 40 U.S.C. § 212a. Believing that
the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a ?demonstration,? the
United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets ?demonstration activity? to
include:
parading, picketing, speechmaking, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other
expressive conduct that convey a message supporting or opposing a
point of view or has the intent, effect or propensity to attract a crowd of
onlookers, but does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or
other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.
Link

dude you just got the other thread locked so why repeat your post here?

it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them.

Hmm... could it be that the other thread was a repost?

So shutup.

"shutup".... nice. 😕

going for lock #2?

Yes, I said shutup with your lies.

what lies?

Do you short-term memory problems?

"dude you just got the other thread locked "

you did. how about keeping this one open by staying on topic instead of trying to win an argument on the internet.

You're a liar. Now go run to a mod and cry about it.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Sheehan nor the Congressman's wife should've been arrested or removed ...

Unlike the grounds surrounding the Capitol, which historically have been the site of
numerous demonstrations, there has been a ban on demonstrations inside the Capitol since 1946 when
Congress decreed: ?It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly -- .
. . to parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.? 40 U.S.C. § 193f(b)(7). The
United States Capitol Police are responsible for enforcing this ban. 40 U.S.C. § 212a. Believing that
the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a ?demonstration,? the
United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets ?demonstration activity? to
include:
parading, picketing, speechmaking, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other
expressive conduct that convey a message supporting or opposing a
point of view or has the intent, effect or propensity to attract a crowd of
onlookers, but does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or
other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.
Link

dude you just got the other thread locked so why repeat your post here?

it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them.

Hmm... could it be that the other thread was a repost?

So shutup.

"shutup".... nice. 😕

going for lock #2?

Yes, I said shutup with your lies.

what lies?

Do you short-term memory problems?

"dude you just got the other thread locked "

you did. how about keeping this one open by staying on topic instead of trying to win an argument on the internet.

You're a liar. Now go run to mod and cry about it.

the mods read bulls#t like yours. i don't have to tell them about it.

grow up..

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Sheehan nor the Congressman's wife should've been arrested or removed ...

Unlike the grounds surrounding the Capitol, which historically have been the site of
numerous demonstrations, there has been a ban on demonstrations inside the Capitol since 1946 when
Congress decreed: ?It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly -- .
. . to parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.? 40 U.S.C. § 193f(b)(7). The
United States Capitol Police are responsible for enforcing this ban. 40 U.S.C. § 212a. Believing that
the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a ?demonstration,? the
United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets ?demonstration activity? to
include:
parading, picketing, speechmaking, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other
expressive conduct that convey a message supporting or opposing a
point of view or has the intent, effect or propensity to attract a crowd of
onlookers, but does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or
other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.
Link

dude you just got the other thread locked so why repeat your post here?

it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them.

Hmm... could it be that the other thread was a repost?

So shutup.

"shutup".... nice. 😕

going for lock #2?

Yes, I said shutup with your lies.

what lies?

Do you short-term memory problems?

"dude you just got the other thread locked "

you did. how about keeping this one open by staying on topic instead of trying to win an argument on the internet.

You're a liar. Now go run to mod and cry about it.

the mods read bulls#t like yours. i don't have to tell them about it.

grow up..

So you don't have anything that disputes my post that I made, so you try to flame-bait. You need to grow up or shut up.

 

[jlmadyson]

I'll say this about Cindy Sheehan if she is the new face of the Democrat party I welcome it.

 

[Meuge]

Can we just stop this, cause this thread will get locked, and this very important issue will disappear again. Just remember - if the thread gets locked, terrorists win.

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: jlmadyson
I'll say this about Cindy Sheehan if she is the new face of the Democrat party I welcome it.

And Pat Robertson is yours....

 

[jlmadyson]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: jlmadyson
I'll say this about Cindy Sheehan if she is the new face of the Democrat party I welcome it.

And Pat Robertson is yours....

Yea, heh.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Sheehan nor the Congressman's wife should've been arrested or removed ...

Unlike the grounds surrounding the Capitol, which historically have been the site of
numerous demonstrations, there has been a ban on demonstrations inside the Capitol since 1946 when
Congress decreed: ?It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly -- .
. . to parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.? 40 U.S.C. § 193f(b)(7). The
United States Capitol Police are responsible for enforcing this ban. 40 U.S.C. § 212a. Believing that
the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a ?demonstration,? the
United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets ?demonstration activity? to
include:
parading, picketing, speechmaking, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other
expressive conduct that convey a message supporting or opposing a
point of view or has the intent, effect or propensity to attract a crowd of
onlookers, but does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or
other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.
Link

dude you just got the other thread locked so why repeat your post here?

it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them.

Hmm... could it be that the other thread was a repost?

So shutup.

"shutup".... nice. 😕

going for lock #2?

Yes, I said shutup with your lies.

what lies?

Do you short-term memory problems?

"dude you just got the other thread locked "

you did. how about keeping this one open by staying on topic instead of trying to win an argument on the internet.

You're a liar. Now go run to mod and cry about it.

the mods read bulls#t like yours. i don't have to tell them about it.

grow up..

So you don't have anything that disputes my post that I made, so you try to flame-bait. You need to grow up or shut up.

i did respond to you. can you not read? 😕

i will repeat it:

"it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them. "

 

[rahvin]

Originally posted by: Meuge
Can we just stop this, cause this thread will get locked, and this very important issue will disappear again. Just remember - if the thread gets locked, terrorists win.

Lol, then Zendari won't be able to get himself up into a lather over her.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: jlmadyson
I'll say this about Cindy Sheehan if she is the new face of the Democrat party I welcome it.

And Pat Robertson is yours....

at least you see the two are similar.

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: jlmadyson
I'll say this about Cindy Sheehan if she is the new face of the Democrat party I welcome it.

And Pat Robertson is yours....

at least you see the two are similar.

Not quite. Your boy prays to God for assassinations and SC justices dying.

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Sheehan nor the Congressman's wife should've been arrested or removed ...

Unlike the grounds surrounding the Capitol, which historically have been the site of
numerous demonstrations, there has been a ban on demonstrations inside the Capitol since 1946 when
Congress decreed: ?It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly -- .
. . to parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.? 40 U.S.C. § 193f(b)(7). The
United States Capitol Police are responsible for enforcing this ban. 40 U.S.C. § 212a. Believing that
the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a ?demonstration,? the
United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets ?demonstration activity? to
include:
parading, picketing, speechmaking, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other
expressive conduct that convey a message supporting or opposing a
point of view or has the intent, effect or propensity to attract a crowd of
onlookers, but does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or
other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.
Link

dude you just got the other thread locked so why repeat your post here?

it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them.

Hmm... could it be that the other thread was a repost?

So shutup.

"shutup".... nice. 😕

going for lock #2?

Yes, I said shutup with your lies.

what lies?

Do you short-term memory problems?

"dude you just got the other thread locked "

you did. how about keeping this one open by staying on topic instead of trying to win an argument on the internet.

You're a liar. Now go run to mod and cry about it.

the mods read bulls#t like yours. i don't have to tell them about it.

grow up..

So you don't have anything that disputes my post that I made, so you try to flame-bait. You need to grow up or shut up.

i did respond to you. can you not read? 😕

i will repeat it:

"it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them. "

Maybe she couldn't hear them with nearly 1000 people in the same building. Could you at least concede that as a possibility? Of course you won't.

 

[jlmadyson]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: jlmadyson
I'll say this about Cindy Sheehan if she is the new face of the Democrat party I welcome it.

And Pat Robertson is yours....

at least you see the two are similar.

Not quite. Your boy prays to God for assassinations and SC justices dying.

Heh, couldn't care less about Pat Robertson. This about Cindy Sheehan being arrested at the capitol also the fact that she is considering running against Sen Feinstein. If so, so be it.

 

[firewall]

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: asadasif
Free speech FTW!

Is not absolute.

How appropriate! I have seen many such cases of hypocrisy on P&N. I will ask you a simple question (the type which Islam-haters use often for their own arguments). Give me a straight answer.

Is there freedom of speech in America? Is Cindy Sheehan correct in excercising her right of freedom of expression/speech and protesting? (Yes/No)

There is no in between or not sure in this question. Both questions are answered with any one option. It is your choice to decide which.

You do know there is an option for you if you don't agree? You excercise your freedom; don't listen to her and get out of the discussion.

Edit: She might have done something illegal and is rightfully punishable under law for it. However, you cannot start bashing her for just excercising her rights!

 

[Martin]

Originally posted by: moshquerade

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Sheehan nor the Congressman's wife should've been arrested or removed ...

Unlike the grounds surrounding the Capitol, which historically have been the site of
numerous demonstrations, there has been a ban on demonstrations inside the Capitol since 1946 when
Congress decreed: ?It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons willfully and knowingly -- .
. . to parade, demonstrate, or picket within any of the Capitol Buildings.? 40 U.S.C. § 193f(b)(7). The
United States Capitol Police are responsible for enforcing this ban. 40 U.S.C. § 212a. Believing that
the Capitol Police needed guidance in determining what behavior constitutes a ?demonstration,? the
United States Capitol Police Board issued a regulation that interprets ?demonstration activity? to
include:
parading, picketing, speechmaking, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other
expressive conduct that convey a message supporting or opposing a
point of view or has the intent, effect or propensity to attract a crowd of
onlookers, but does not include merely wearing Tee shirts, buttons or
other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.
Link

dude you just got the other thread locked so why repeat your post here?

it was her intent that got her taken out of the building, not just the fact she was wearing a t-shirt. when questioned about it by officials she would not even speak to them.

1. Was wearing a Tshirt illegal?
2. Is choosing not to talk to a person illegal?

You, zendari and your ilk are pathetic. Its not enough to merely demonize and insult those who disagree with you, now you're defending people getting arested despite them not breaking the law.

You would not believe how glad I am that there are very few people like you here.

 

[Starbuck1975]

I'll say this about Cindy Sheehan if she is the new face of the Democrat party I welcome it.

I don't...Sheehan's antics only fire up the conservative base, and continue to enable Republican dominance...she is not a lightning rod for the opposition but rather the status quo.

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: jlmadyson
I'll say this about Cindy Sheehan if she is the new face of the Democrat party I welcome it.

And Pat Robertson is yours....

owned!!!

 

[jlmadyson]

Originally posted by: Starbuck1975

I'll say this about Cindy Sheehan if she is the new face of the Democrat party I welcome it.

I don't...Sheehan's antics only fire up the conservative base, and continue to enable Republican dominance...she is not a lightning rod for the opposition but rather the status quo.

Correct