simpletron
Member
- Oct 31, 2008
- 189
- 14
- 81
Is the information Congress recieves behind closed doors now being considered material non-public information?
The reason why I ask is even if an insider tells someone else the material non-public information, that someone can be prosecuted for insider trading. For example if the CEO of company A tells his neighbor that company A's earnings are going to be higher than expected and then that neighbor buy company A stock before the earnings report, then the neighbor can be prosecuted.
So if the congressional information is considered material non-public information, then wouldn't trading on non-public political-intelligence also be illegal under both bills. But it would harder to detect under the cantor bill because of the no disclosure of political-intelligence groups.
If the congressional information isn't being consider material non-public information, I can see why there is a fuss for the Grassley amendment and should be adding to get the ball moving.
The reason why I ask is even if an insider tells someone else the material non-public information, that someone can be prosecuted for insider trading. For example if the CEO of company A tells his neighbor that company A's earnings are going to be higher than expected and then that neighbor buy company A stock before the earnings report, then the neighbor can be prosecuted.
So if the congressional information is considered material non-public information, then wouldn't trading on non-public political-intelligence also be illegal under both bills. But it would harder to detect under the cantor bill because of the no disclosure of political-intelligence groups.
If the congressional information isn't being consider material non-public information, I can see why there is a fuss for the Grassley amendment and should be adding to get the ball moving.
