Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
I don't know of any... I find debating Canadian politics pretty unfruitful, since given our current set of choices, there isn't much to debate except pie in the sky dreaming of a better system for a more representative accountable government.
Harper has said on multiple occasions he wouldn't send troops to Iraq. Looking back going to war would have been a bad idea, Martin and his minister of defense (David Pratt) condemned Chretien for NOT going.Originally posted by: DarkKnight69
I relize that we were for war. I am saying I dont think that we would like to go now. I think Harper will commit troops to Iraq if he is elected to power. That is the only thing that scares me about him, he is too willing to be a puppet to the american government!
His social policies seem sound, and i LOVE the idea of bolstering the military!
Originally posted by: Stunt
I am far more wary of another Liberal government than Harper!!...😛
Originally posted by: desy
For example Statistically Canada wanted to go to Iraq with the US ,if you excluded Quebec , we were actually FOR going to war.
Quebec was rabidly against it over 80% at the time and skewed the results to show a small majority to stay out of the war in public opinion polling
So you are correct, we may have gone to war if Harper was in charge but he would have been representing pretty much the will of Canada less Quebec if we did.
Hindsight is 20/20. . .
Originally posted by: meltdown75
CBC News did a short peice with an IT person yesterday, describing each party's web presence. Apparently none of the parties have active blogs and/or forums and their websites generally sucked. Whoever gets a leg up first in terms of the internet could get a nice surprise in votes come election time, imho.
Harper is da debbil!
oh definitely!Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: meltdown75
CBC News did a short peice with an IT person yesterday, describing each party's web presence. Apparently none of the parties have active blogs and/or forums and their websites generally sucked. Whoever gets a leg up first in terms of the internet could get a nice surprise in votes come election time, imho.
Harper is da debbil!
Wouldn't want to go to a Party forum anyways. Need something more neutral.
Originally posted by: meltdown75
oh definitely!Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: meltdown75
CBC News did a short peice with an IT person yesterday, describing each party's web presence. Apparently none of the parties have active blogs and/or forums and their websites generally sucked. Whoever gets a leg up first in terms of the internet could get a nice surprise in votes come election time, imho.
Harper is da debbil!
Wouldn't want to go to a Party forum anyways. Need something more neutral.
there are enough Canadians here, seems like a great place for political debate 🙂
Originally posted by: Aelius
A tax cut to the low/middle class is the best way to go and you don't do that by cutting the GST.
Cutting the GST has the biggest effect for whomever spends the most. Low and middle income families are not in that group. Although I'm sure it would help them to some degree.
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Aelius
A tax cut to the low/middle class is the best way to go and you don't do that by cutting the GST.
Cutting the GST has the biggest effect for whomever spends the most. Low and middle income families are not in that group. Although I'm sure it would help them to some degree.
What about all the people who make under the ~$8,000 limit and pay no income tax? They have to pay GST on everything they buy. If there were no GST they would theoretically pay no tax at all. This would include just about everyone on welfare AFAIK. Lotsa poor people. 🙂
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Aelius
A tax cut to the low/middle class is the best way to go and you don't do that by cutting the GST.
Cutting the GST has the biggest effect for whomever spends the most. Low and middle income families are not in that group. Although I'm sure it would help them to some degree.
What about all the people who make under the ~$8,000 limit and pay no income tax? They have to pay GST on everything they buy. If there were no GST they would theoretically pay no tax at all. This would include just about everyone on welfare AFAIK. Lotsa poor people. 🙂
GST rebate cheques covers the poors' payment of the GST.