• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Canadian Economy: California Dreamin'

Stunt

Diamond Member
The Canadian economy in 2005 surged past the $1 trillion dollar mark to $1.13 trillion. GDP outpaced Spain and New York even with population of Spain 33% more. Lots of success from Canada recently and more respect on the international stage. Good to see.

California dreamin'
David Wolf
From the March 13-26, 2006 issue of Canadian Business magazine

Canada is moving up in the world. The fourth-quarter national accounts released on Feb. 28 revealed that our economy passed the US$1-trillion mark in gross domestic product for the first time in history, joining 13-digit titans America, Japan, Germany, Britain, France, China, Italy and Spain. In fact, Canada blew right past the mark, with output totalling US$1.13 trillion for 2005 as a whole, and with strong growth through the year tacking on another US$100 billion in the Q4 annualized estimate. Canada's economy in international benchmark U.S.-dollar terms has grown 91% over the past decade, and 58% in the past four years alone.

That strong recent growth has vaulted Canada up the international league tables. We estimate that Canada overtook Spain as the eighth-largest economy in the world in 2005. Ten years ago, Japan's economy was nine times larger than Canada's; it's now only four times larger. As recently as three years ago, the gross state product of New York was bigger than Canada's GDP; we estimate that it's now 17% smaller. Of course, the whole U.S. economic behemoth, at US$12.5 trillion, is still 11 times bigger than us, but that's down from a consistent 14 times bigger between 1998 and 2002.

Does any of this matter for anything other than national pride? Practically speaking, probably not. The International Monetary Fund doesn't give out bonus special drawing rights for hitting the trillion-dollar mark. There's no fancy club we can now join (the G8 is probably the closest thing, but we're already members). Canada more generally has always seemed to punch above its economic weight in international policy circles; while a little extra mustard certainly doesn't hurt, it isn't going to get us into the heavyweight division. And measuring economic size at current prices and exchange rates isn't always the best guide to clout; the purchasing power parity measure preferred by many economists lifts China from sixth- to second-largest economy in the world, a ranking better matching our intuitive sense of the world today.

Still, Canada's achievement of a trillion dollars in output and its move up the international economic pecking order do usefully summarize the country's economic renaissance of recent years. To be sure, part of it has been luck, as strong global demand has driven a surge in the prices of the commodities with which Canada earns its way in the world. Higher prices for oil, gas and metals do double duty in lifting Canada's U.S.-dollar-measured GDP, boosting both our terms of trade and our currency. But an improved domestic macroeconomic framework has played an important role as well, as the economy is reaping the dividends of the fiscal balance and price stability restored in the 1990s, which have positioned Canada to make the most of a favourable external environment.

For Canada to make further progress up the international league tables, though, the domestic side will have to contribute even more. The Canadian economy has already seemingly picked the low-hanging fruit, so to speak, of the strong global economy. It is unlikely that even sustained robust world growth would lead to the same incremental rises in commodity prices and the Canadian dollar over the next three years as over the past three. (That would put oil at US$122 a barrel and the loonie at US$1.07.) To keep up the pace, higher sustained real GDP growth will be needed, and that demands a vast improvement on the past three years' 0.2% average annual growth in productivity. Increased capital deepening in recent years, an emerging scarcity of domestic labour (particularly out west), intensifying competitive pressures and even the invigorated market for corporate control are all reasons to expect stronger productivity growth ahead. But even more efficient Canadian industry won't be enough if the global economy turns out weaker than currently looks likely.

In any event, should the past three years' growth rates somehow be sustained, we estimate that Canada's economy could in fact catch California's by 2010. That may be highly unlikely. But to paraphrase the Mamas and the Papas, it is nice to dream on such a winter's day.
link
 
Canada has had a great economy for a long time, they're doing something right up there. I consider the Canadian economy the closest to the US economy in the world, except on a smaller scale.
 
Originally posted by: ntdz
Canada has had a great economy for a long time, they're doing something right up there...
Open trade, balanced budgets, immigration, good international relationships.

Did you know Canada's trade relationships with China, India and Cuba are all far more agressive than the US?
 
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: ntdz
Canada has had a great economy for a long time, they're doing something right up there...
Open trade, balanced budgets, immigration, good international relationships.

Did you know Canada's trade relationships with China, India and Cuba are all far more agressive than the US?

More agressive in what way? More investment there, better relations? I doubt Canada has better relations with India than we do, but I could definetly see more investment per capita than the US.
 
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: sandorski
"balanced budgets", hehe 😉
Something that will continue under the Conservatives as well 🙂

If they manage to do so, I'll probably vote for them next election. If not, I'll wait and see what the Liberals do in their Leadership race.
 
Dalton Mcguinty

LONDON (CP) ? Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty was named world ?Personality of the Year? on Thursday by a business publication based in England.

Foreign Direct Investment magazine, part of the Financial Times group of London, says it chose McGuinty because of his efforts to promote research and innovation.

This surprised me a whole lot - I'm not as down on the Ontario liberals as some, but I didn't think they'd really done anything praiseworthy.
 
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Dalton Mcguinty

LONDON (CP) ? Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty was named world ?Personality of the Year? on Thursday by a business publication based in England.

Foreign Direct Investment magazine, part of the Financial Times group of London, says it chose McGuinty because of his efforts to promote research and innovation.
This surprised me a whole lot - I'm not as down on the Ontario liberals as some, but I didn't think they'd really done anything praiseworthy.
McGuinty has a personality...:laugh:
 
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: sandorski
"balanced budgets", hehe 😉
Something that will continue under the Conservatives as well 🙂
If they manage to do so, I'll probably vote for them next election. If not, I'll wait and see what the Liberals do in their Leadership race.
Beat the crap out of each other and elect an ndp clone, tree hugging hippy or a foreign policy nut?
Even though everyone and their son is running, the choices are pretty terrible. If I knew the Liberals were going to win, I'd want Brison at the helm. Otherwise the more left wing the better; they will make themselves look bad and duke it out with the ndp. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: HombrePequeno
I'm sure high oil prices may have had some help with the stellar growth of the Canadian economy.
No doubt.
Although Canada produces about a third the amount of oil the US does.

I think more money has been generated from metals.
 
Back
Top