zsdersw
Lifer
- Oct 29, 2003
- 10,505
- 2
- 0
Sorry there, but the Supreme Court disagrees with you.
Why should I care that a minority on the Supreme Court wrongly think that foreign law should apply to or shape/guide US laws?
And you health care analogy fails. There is nothing inherent to health care that implies it should/should not be state funded.
Whereas you whole contention before is that marriage inherently needs consent, and it is not just your bigotry that requires it.
Inherent or not only matters in this discussion because you want it to matter... because you like to see your words appear on the Internet in an online forum and like to argue for no relevant reason.
Consent is not required for participation in Canada's healthcare system; participation is compulsory.
The point is that Canada's determinations do not either validate or invalidate US determinations. In case you didn't know, Canada and the US are separate countries.. and while our economies are very closely intertwined, we think and act independently in matters of law and public policy.
Last edited: