Canada has NO tanks -- Seattle Times

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

eviltoon

Senior member
Jun 22, 2001
336
0
0
LOL, apparently Canada is down to 1 helicopter too!

Quote
The one remaining Sea King involved in Operation Megaphone needed to make two trips to lower 14 armed Canadian soldiers on to GTS Katie, a U.S.-owned ship chartered by Ottawa to return $223 million worth of military equipment to Canada from Kosovo


We've got a helecopter! Oh that's great, really great! Man, who says we're not ready?!
 

Rudee

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
11,218
2
76
Like I said before, Canada is not policing the world; that's the U.S. We simply don't need a huge modern military. Think of Canada as the world's security guard. We're just sitting there reading the newspaper eating a sandwich, while our American neighbors spend billions of money into tanks, ships and aircraft. Call us when you need us...... We'll be happy to offer moral support. Just don't ask us to commit anything larger than a canoe or two.
 

MemnochtheDevil

Senior member
Aug 19, 2001
521
0
0
Originally posted by: Rudee
Like I said before, Canada is not policing the world; that's the U.S. We simply don't need a huge modern military. Think of Canada as the world's security guard. We're just sitting there reading the newspaper eating a sandwich, while our American neighbors spend billions of money into tanks, ships and aircraft. Call us when you need us...... We'll be happy to offer moral support. Just don't ask us to commit anything larger than a canoe or two.

Having no real military budget/power is the main benefit to being next to a large friendly country with a huge military that has no desire to invade (especially now that John Candy is dead ;)).

 

Rudee

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
11,218
2
76
Originally posted by: MemnochtheDevil
Originally posted by: Rudee
Like I said before, Canada is not policing the world; that's the U.S. We simply don't need a huge modern military. Think of Canada as the world's security guard. We're just sitting there reading the newspaper eating a sandwich, while our American neighbors spend billions of money into tanks, ships and aircraft. Call us when you need us...... We'll be happy to offer moral support. Just don't ask us to commit anything larger than a canoe or two.

Having no real military budget/power is the main benefit to being next to a large friendly country with a huge military that has no desire to invade (especially now that John Candy is dead ;)).

Exactly, we can spend the billions of dollars we *didn't* spend on military on economic growth, which allows us to have good jobs, a safe neighborhood to raise our children, and we can sleep at night without worrying about someone trying to kill us.

 

eviltoon

Senior member
Jun 22, 2001
336
0
0
annex?! screw that, the time to strike is NOW!!

JudasPriest, I keep chuckling about your reply. But you know the more I think about it...You'se guys don't need to strike, you just need to ask. I mean really, what're we going to do. Say no....and then what?

I may not agree with the American point of view all the time, but I do know why we have our current peace and standard of living. Yeah, it's largely due to the military that we don't have to spend $ on. And having the biggest gosh darn consumer and distributor right next door. I'm grateful. Sometimes embarrassed, but grateful.

 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
You can look on the official Canadian military site to see that they have some tanks they picked up a damn long time ago.

The Canadian military's equipment is a f**king joke, thanks in great part to the Liberals. I have to say it's selfishness on the part of many canadians knowing that as long as they have a rifle or two to throw into any conflict to say they played a part they don't need a real capable military because the US's massive one would step to the plate if Canada's security was actually threatened.
yep. and the socialist states in europe. we've been spending our money protecting them for a long time, without even taking a tribute, i might add, that they've all forgotten what its like having a military and that the world is a scary place.
It's true and without the US Canada would not have the same social programs it has now because it would HAVE to spend more on a military.

Among the western nations Canada is damn near the very bottom for its percentage of GDP spending that goes into the military.
Exactly, we can spend the billions of dollars we *didn't* spend on military on economic growth, which allows us to have good jobs, a safe neighborhood to raise our children, and we can sleep at night without worrying about someone trying to kill us.
Well the US still has a better economy than Canada - a per capita better economy I might add. And in terms of sleeping safe at night tell that to the many victims of home invasions that have plaqued Halifax in recent times.

I don't mean to be the devil's advocate, but Canada has no excuse for spending so little on their military. It's an insult to those they serve and stands as a continual joke against Canada. The money isn't being better spent by the Liberals. Just because they save a couple billion here doesn't mean they're using it properly there - unless you consider kissing the ass of the natives over treaties signed 200 years ago good fiscal policy.
 

Rudee

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
11,218
2
76
Originally posted by: Skoorb

I have to say it's selfishness on the part of many canadians knowing that as long as they have a rifle or two to throw into any conflict to say they played a part ...

The truth is, Skoorb, that the majority of Canadians would prefer not to play any part at all.
 

hagbard

Banned
Nov 30, 2000
2,775
0
0
Originally posted by: Rudee
Like I said before, Canada is not policing the world; that's the U.S. We simply don't need a huge modern military. Think of Canada as the world's security guard. We're just sitting there reading the newspaper eating a sandwich, while our American neighbors spend billions of money into tanks, ships and aircraft. Call us when you need us...... We'll be happy to offer moral support. Just don't ask us to commit anything larger than a canoe or two.

And hopefully we can keep it that way.

 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
The truth is, Skoorb, that the majority of Canadians would prefer not to play any part at all.
Sad isn't it? Ignore the bully when he's beating on a stranger and he may beat on you next and it's too late. Countries ignore the rest of the world at their own peril. Not saying the US doesn't overstep its bounds but the Canadian political sense, I think, is really in a rut.
 

Rudee

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
11,218
2
76
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Well the US still has a better economy than Canada - a per capita better economy I might add. [/quote]

*cough* debt ratio *cough*
 

Rudee

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
11,218
2
76
Originally posted by: Skoorb
The truth is, Skoorb, that the majority of Canadians would prefer not to play any part at all.
Sad isn't it? Ignore the bully when he's beating on a stranger and he may beat on you next and it's too late. Countries ignore the rest of the world at their own peril. Not saying the US doesn't overstep its bounds but the Canadian political sense, I think, is really in a rut.

I agree, it's sad. But Canadian history shows this to be the norm. Look the other way, don't make eye contact, and the problem will surely disappear.









... or reappear somewhere else for somebody else do deal with it.

 

ultimatebob

Lifer
Jul 1, 2001
25,134
2,450
126
Originally posted by: ElFenix
why do we need to invade? the only thing we don't get exactly how we want it is paper... if we invaded then we'd have to put up with canadian beer

True, but the US will FINALLY have some quality Hockey teams! :D
 

hagbard

Banned
Nov 30, 2000
2,775
0
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
The truth is, Skoorb, that the majority of Canadians would prefer not to play any part at all.
Sad isn't it? Ignore the bully when he's beating on a stranger and he may beat on you next and it's too late. Countries ignore the rest of the world at their own peril. Not saying the US doesn't overstep its bounds but the Canadian political sense, I think, is really in a rut.

We question the motivation behind a US attack on Iraq. As you know, as a Canadian, we have stepped in front of many bullies, but its hard to tell which is the bully in this case.

 

hagbard

Banned
Nov 30, 2000
2,775
0
0
Originally posted by: Rudee
Originally posted by: Skoorb
The truth is, Skoorb, that the majority of Canadians would prefer not to play any part at all.
Sad isn't it? Ignore the bully when he's beating on a stranger and he may beat on you next and it's too late. Countries ignore the rest of the world at their own peril. Not saying the US doesn't overstep its bounds but the Canadian political sense, I think, is really in a rut.

I agree, it's sad. But Canadian history shows this to be the norm. Look the other way, don't make eye contact, and the problem will surely disappear.


Suppose I should expect that from a qusi-American Albertan.


 

Zugzwang152

Lifer
Oct 30, 2001
12,134
1
0
no one joins the military in canada, cause they know what POS equipment and support from the government they get. Compared with all the training and up to date equipment even basic US infantrymen get, they might as well give them a wife-beater, stained cut off jeans and a less-than pointy stick. canada needs to make a serious fiscal commitment to its uniformed services to get the recruits, imo :)
 

KenGr

Senior member
Aug 22, 2002
725
0
0
Originally posted by: MemnochtheDevil
Originally posted by: Rudee
Like I said before, Canada is not policing the world; that's the U.S. We simply don't need a huge modern military. Think of Canada as the world's security guard. We're just sitting there reading the newspaper eating a sandwich, while our American neighbors spend billions of money into tanks, ships and aircraft. Call us when you need us...... We'll be happy to offer moral support. Just don't ask us to commit anything larger than a canoe or two.

Having no real military budget/power is the main benefit to being next to a large friendly country with a huge military that has no desire to invade (especially now that John Candy is dead ;)).


Yeah, but we may need a preemptory strike to take custody of Shania and Avril and make sure they keep Celine on their side.



 

Scouzer

Lifer
Jun 3, 2001
10,358
5
0
It's sad really. This has and will always be the Canadian 'military doctrine'.

Before World War I, we had nothing. Then a crisis, we panic and whip together guys at massive expense, and get there (for the most part) a year late.

Before World War II, we had nothing. Then a crisis, we panic and whip together guys at a massive expensive, and get there (for the most part) a year late. (Most of it took longer this time)

It is a matter of time before they officially downgrade the Canadian Military from a real military, to a militia force. Crisis happens, but big conflicts don't last years anymore (Other than terrorist or guerrila activities). We don't have a year to panic and get our sh!t together. If we're going to do anything in the global military scene, they need money now.

With the budget not going up significantly anytime soon, we can expect a useless Canadian Military very soon. Not even 9/11 could get those liberal fvcks to fix something.

As for you people who don't think we need an army because of the US, that's not right. We need to pull at least half of our own weight. All we are is a giant mooch on everyone else's militaries. Sh!t happens to us? Oh, everyone else will be there to fix it for us, at their expense. Would we at least pay their expenses to save our asses (In some hypothetical situation)? Not fvcking likely.

A few facts on the Canadian Military

- In theory, there are about 120 Leopard C1E's in our tank arsenal. This is a relatively lightly armored tank, designed by Germany in the 60's (perhaps even late 50's). They were upgraded a bit in the 90's I believe, but still do not meet modern standards.
- In theory, there are about 120 CF-18 Hornets. How many have been scrapped due to mechanical problems/lack of pilots etc. I don't know. My father works at the Edmonton International Airport and is a war buff himself. He tells me that on a 'good' day there will only be about 20 functional ready-to-fly (Not ready to scramble...ready to fly on a few hours notice) CF 18's.
- Our training is still good, make no mistake. Our equipment just is not anywhere near modern standards.
- The grunts use modified M16A1's I believe.
- The few elite guys we have (The Snipers, JTF-2 etc.) are extremely well funded. They are definitely up with US standards - on technology and training. Other than that...

As Skoorb said, a huge amount of money is WASTED in this country by pouring it into kissing minorities asses. Now don't think I'm racist, I'm raising a good point here. A Native living on the reserve will recieve something between $15000-$20000 just to turn 18! Free housing on the reserve, free everything. Tremendous tax breaks. Its a giant waste of money welfare program. But politicians are too afraid to make any changes (or too corrupt to care) because that'd be politically incorrrect.

Spent 20 minutes or so on this reply, hope I get some more replies! I tend to kill threads.
 

chiwawa626

Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
12,013
0
0
LOL this is the funnyest thing ive read ever...but then when u think about it theres nothing great about canada for someone to take it over anyways...so i guess their pretty safe..lol
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
It's sad really. This has and will always be the Canadian 'military doctrine'.

Before World War I, we had nothing. Then a crisis, we panic and whip together guys at massive expense, and get there (for the most part) a year late.

Before World War II, we had nothing. Then a crisis, we panic and whip together guys at a massive expensive, and get there (for the most part) a year late. (Most of it took longer this time)

This pretty much describes the US as well. After 2 world wars, we just decided it was foolish to completely disassemble the military.
 

Scouzer

Lifer
Jun 3, 2001
10,358
5
0
Originally posted by: charrison
It's sad really. This has and will always be the Canadian 'military doctrine'.

Before World War I, we had nothing. Then a crisis, we panic and whip together guys at massive expense, and get there (for the most part) a year late.

Before World War II, we had nothing. Then a crisis, we panic and whip together guys at a massive expensive, and get there (for the most part) a year late. (Most of it took longer this time)

This pretty much describes the US as well. After 2 world wars, we just decided it was foolish to completely disassemble the military.

Well this is true, but the US wanted to stay out of world affairs during this time period. Canada on the other hand was obligated to follow Britain in World War I. In World War II we were no longer officially obligated, but still felt obligated. Which means any major problem Britain got into, we did too. We should of had some preperation to follow through with our obligations.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: Scouzer
Originally posted by: charrison
It's sad really. This has and will always be the Canadian 'military doctrine'.

Before World War I, we had nothing. Then a crisis, we panic and whip together guys at massive expense, and get there (for the most part) a year late.

Before World War II, we had nothing. Then a crisis, we panic and whip together guys at a massive expensive, and get there (for the most part) a year late. (Most of it took longer this time)

This pretty much describes the US as well. After 2 world wars, we just decided it was foolish to completely disassemble the military.

Well this is true, but the US wanted to stay out of world affairs during this time period. Canada on the other hand was obligated to follow Britain in World War I. In World War II we were no longer officially obligated, but still felt obligated. Which means any major problem Britain got into, we did too. We should of had some preperation to follow through with our obligations.


Speaking of obligations, I beleive Canada is not meetings its NATO obligations.
 

RbSX

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2002
8,351
1
76
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Well, almost. Today's Seattle Times has an editorial by Barry Cooper, a political science professor at the University of Calgary.

About the only blue-water vessels that are approximately equal to their U.S. equivalents are a dozen Halifax-class frigates. They are still relatively up-to-date ? except that they carry Sea King helicopters. At 40-plus years of age, these dangerous helicopters are considerably senior to the pilots who fly them.

Worst of all, half of Canada's surface fleet and trained sailors are committed to Operation Apollo, Canada's military contribution to the international campaign against terrorism. But the current levels of commitment are simply not sustainable. There are no plans to replace the old ships. There is no slack to take the frigates out of service to upgrade them. By conservative estimates, within five years, Canada will be unable to mount any task-group deployments.

Matters are even worse in the other two services. The number of operational CF-18 jet fighters has declined from 122 some 20 years ago to about 80. One reason so many Air Canada pilots are so young is because they took early retirement from the air force.

Worst of all is the army. It needs 24 new fire-control-support technicians a year to operate certain wheeled armored vehicles. Over the past four years, a total of four technicians have been recruited. Canada has no first-class tanks.

Maybe we do need to annex Canada for its own protection ;)

Funny, we don't want you.

 

BadNewsBears

Diamond Member
Dec 14, 2000
3,426
0
0
Dude quality hockey teams. Go to michigan man. RED WINGS! EVer notice like almost all of the all star team is like redwings. Lol
 

Phuz

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2000
4,349
0
0
There is a lot of domestic pressures from the United States to contribute - no longer do we really have the role of peacekeepers. I agree that Canada must play their part in sustaining international stability and we need to stop pretending that we are furthering the Canadian cause by skimping on military spending....
however, I don't think we should be fighting wars thats deemed necessity by one of the only countries pushing the whole agenda.

Our military simply isn't strong enough to meet its NATO obligations, let alone play the role that the US wants us too. Out of -10k~ units, 50% or more are still in Kosovo, bosnia, afghanistan, etc. Of the 16 members of the NATO alliance, Canada ranks 12th on a per-capita basis in its defense expenditures. In comparison, the smaller country of Luxembourg ranks 10th.

Too many Americans think Canadians owe service, a contribution, a larger military budget. I think a big reason as to why we contribute so little to our military is because we're being told to. Our autonomy is a joke, so I don't find it overly surprising that Canadians flip em' the bird once and a while, hence the issues with US and NAFTA, marijuana decriminalization, etc... Canada is living under a US military umbrella - yes, but that is also the reason why we are virtually forced to support the US in its WOT.