I'm going to do my best to articulate both sides of the argument in a lucid manner, but please ask for clarification if I'm unclear.
I have a friend who has openly stated that he doesn't like definitives, so his responses to almost any question has a great deal of equivocation. "Maybe", "possibly", and "most likely" seems to precede any response. This might seem like a legitimate response, because there certainly are times when other plans, tentative or confirmed, might interfere; however, he has also stated that he has no plans, and that the only possible encumbrance in his being there would be the unforeseen. Rather than simply say yes or no, he equivocates, and it leaves my schedule in a state of uncertainty as a result. It seems obvious enough that circumstances beyond control might interfere with your plans (e.g. a car wreck), but what value is there in being so noncommital?
I think that's enough explanation for now. I'd appreciate it if even a few of you could give me your thoughts. I realize it's a trite argument, and I normally don't concern myself with them; however, he has the gift of getting me sufficiently annoyed to take action.
			
			I have a friend who has openly stated that he doesn't like definitives, so his responses to almost any question has a great deal of equivocation. "Maybe", "possibly", and "most likely" seems to precede any response. This might seem like a legitimate response, because there certainly are times when other plans, tentative or confirmed, might interfere; however, he has also stated that he has no plans, and that the only possible encumbrance in his being there would be the unforeseen. Rather than simply say yes or no, he equivocates, and it leaves my schedule in a state of uncertainty as a result. It seems obvious enough that circumstances beyond control might interfere with your plans (e.g. a car wreck), but what value is there in being so noncommital?
I think that's enough explanation for now. I'd appreciate it if even a few of you could give me your thoughts. I realize it's a trite argument, and I normally don't concern myself with them; however, he has the gift of getting me sufficiently annoyed to take action.
				
		
			