• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Can you hear the difference?

I have studio monitors for speakers so I got it right. It had more depth. Although had it not been a side by side, prolly would not have been able to notice.
 
In this recording I had difficulty, but in many others it's been easy to tell the difference for me. I had several 128kbps mp3 albums that were later replaced with 320kbps versions and those played side by side were easily identifiable.
 
i wanted to try it more than once on different systems but it is always the same...should be randomized.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I think they should randomize it and also give different songs...but thanks for revealing the answer...
 
404 good comparison not found.

i've got prog rock where 320kbps vs lossless is extremely obvious. one guy singing loudly does not stetch the range of a shitty mp3's compression.
 
brblx said:
404 good comparison not found.

i've got prog rock where 320kbps vs lossless is extremely obvious. one guy singing loudly does not stetch the range of a shitty mp3's compression.
Click to expand...

LOL no kidding! This "test" is like walking up to two piles of dogshit and someone asking you which one smells better!
 
I was able to tell the difference on my laptop speakers. You just need to know what to listen for.

Much tougher is FLAC vs. 320kbit MP3.
 
yes on my macbook...the comparison is a joke and I also have bad hearing...

Koing
 
They sound identical coming through my terrible bar speaker. Can't find the adapter for my HD595
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nope, got it wrong, but I think it was because of the style of music. If it was a thrash or death metal song with plenty of cymbal abuse the difference would have been very clear.

EDIT: And of course, with 50:50 odds it's a meaningless test anyways. It should include at least several different songs.
 
I got it right, but had to do several listen throughs. What gives it away is the cymbals (or whatever they are) at the end are noticeably more shallow at 128kbps. The problem is the guy singing loudly was enough distraction to throw me off requiring several listen-throughs.

High quality bit rates are generally far more important when it comes to subtleties on the high and low end, when there's a lot of loud mid-range it becomes less important. At least thats the way it is for me.
 
Even on some really nice Grado headphones that my friend has, after 320kbps MP3s, I stop being able to hear the difference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top