Homes are very, very costly for the first five years after you get your first home. Then, assuming you don't go up to a massively more expensive house later, they just get cheaper and cheaper. While rent just goes up and up. After a couple decades the home is nearly free while rent will be thousands of dollars a month.
There are two types: (1) money markets at a bank and (2) money markets at an investment company.Can you explain a bit more about money market accounts? I'd like to know more about how they work, what you can and can't do with them, why someone might not want one, etc.
You have the big expenses all up front with a house. People want to upgrade the house, repair things the previous owner neglected for far too long, repaint, get better appliances, buy furniture that you never wanted or had room for before, get a lawn mower or snow blower or grill, get all the tools that you need, etc. To top it off, you have the most debt so you are paying the most interest.Why the first 5 years? Is it just because that is the time you are doing the upgrades you like to the house? We still need to replace our deck and fence. Not looking forward to that. I just keep saving away till i can pay for it with cash.
i'm broke as shit. my cc is maxed. no one is giving me extra credit. i blame Obama.
Doesn't that kind of open it up a bit? If it's money that I'm not spending, then it's pretty much by definition "saved". What are they counting as "savings" in this context? Long term bonds, or just a bank account?...60% said they would dip into savings...
wouldnt someone who rents, has good health insurance and a reliable car not really have to worry about that?
The issue is that most people think you need to have that in a savings account just sitting there fully liquid. Semi-liquid is far, far better. Have wealth you can borrow against. Take a CD for example. You could lock up your money for years and in an emergency pay a huge fee and lost interest to withdraw from the CD. Or, talk to a personal banker, he'll just loan you money from your CD at a nominal interest rate. You still have the CD, you don't pay fees or lose that interest. But you get through your emergency. It is far better to be semi-liquid.All of you saying that having $10-20k in reserves is extra cautious are wrong. IMO that's just plain where you want to be. I think having six months of maintain-your-lifestyle expenses in reserve is a minimum. Then if the crap hits the fan you start living poor and stretch that money out.
Many people keep 6 months expense in savings liquid, that can be much more than 20k. It's there for liquid cash with zero risk.
2 months in checking
6 months in savings
invest the rest.
random 2000 dollar things/shit? like what? im genuinely curious, because i certainly dont have that in savings![]()
If you do, then you are in good company (25%) because half of Americans don't have $2,000 USD for a rainy day/emergency.
http://money.cnn.com/2011/05/24/news/economy/americans_lack_emergency_funds/?iref=NS1#0_undefined,0_
