lobadobadingdong
Lifer
what's an lsat?
Originally posted by: lobadobadingdong
what's an lsat?
As a young attorney, I have a piece of friendly advice: think in a SERIOUS way why you are going to law school, and consider whether it is a good idea.
Originally posted by: BlipBlop
As a young attorney, I have a piece of friendly advice: think in a SERIOUS way why you are going to law school, and consider whether it is a good idea.
The whole lawschool "industry" is built on the misconception that lawschool is like medschool, where entrance means that you will be a wealth lawyer at some point, given time. This is not true. If you are not at a top school and end up in the middle of your class, your chances of earning a six figure salary are ZERO, unless of course, you start your own firm and strike it rich, but that carries the same probabilities as winning the lottery.
At my school, students outside the top 10% of the class are either jobless at graduation or have offers for jobs that will make them 40k-60k a year, and I'm in the NorthEast, so that's not alot of money!!
Originally posted by: illmustard
i've decided 100% that i wanna goto law school. i have a BS in sociology/law. but from what i know is that you can't take the patent bar test unless you have a engineering/science background. correct? what im asking is if I could you still venture into the IP field or is it only limited to those with an egineering background.. confused
Right now I'm pursuing an IP certificate (2nd year at UF). It's generally true that in order to practice patent law, you need a technical (i.e., hard science) background (not necessarily engineering, but EE's are the most sought-after). All other fields of IP (copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets) do not require a technical background. I think they are more integrated with general litigation. From the IP firms I've looked at, most specialize in patent law and for the other fields, they bring in lawyers who are good litigators but not necessarily specializing in IP.Originally posted by: illmustard
I've become very interested in IP law, but i've heard that you need a B.S. in egineering. Does that only apply to those who want to venture into the patents field or for any field under Intellectual property (i.e copyrights, trademark, etc) Or are copyright, trademark all under patents. i dunno, maybe some of your law buffs can help me out.
Originally posted by: yellowperil
Right now I'm pursuing an IP certificate (2nd year at UF). It's generally true that in order to practice patent law, you need a technical (i.e., hard science) background (not necessarily engineering, but EE's are the most sought-after). All other fields of IP (copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets) do not require a technical background. I think they are more integrated with general litigation. From the IP firms I've looked at, most specialize in patent law and for the other fields, they bring in lawyers who are good litigators but not necessarily specializing in IP.Originally posted by: illmustard
I've become very interested in IP law, but i've heard that you need a B.S. in egineering. Does that only apply to those who want to venture into the patents field or for any field under Intellectual property (i.e copyrights, trademark, etc) Or are copyright, trademark all under patents. i dunno, maybe some of your law buffs can help me out.
Also, just to echo BlipBlop, the job market for lawyers is pretty saturated. Every employer I've looked at wants at least top 1/3, or law journal/moot court, or a few years experience. I'm lucky enough that I'll only have $50K of total student loan debts when I graduate, but optimistically I'm only looking at a $50K job.
Originally posted by: gigapet
you can do whatever you want with the right contacts and enough $$$
Originally posted by: BlipBlop
As a young attorney, I have a piece of friendly advice: think in a SERIOUS way why you are going to law school, and consider whether it is a good idea.
Don_Vito is a few years ahead of me and I've never met him, but I can tell you that we both have undergone very similar experiences and if we were to meet, we'd have so many stories in common. Law school is a miserable experience simply because law school is designed to stratify students according to a curve, which then allows firms to pick the best. Therefore, unless you are at the top schools, law school IS NOT A TICKET TO RICHES OR TO EVEN A HIGH SALARY! READ THAT AGAIN!
The whole lawschool "industry" is built on the misconception that lawschool is like medschool, where entrance means that you will be a wealth lawyer at some point, given time. This is not true. If you are not at a top school and end up in the middle of your class, your chances of earning a six figure salary are ZERO, unless of course, you start your own firm and strike it rich, but that carries the same probabilities as winning the lottery.
At my school, students outside the top 10% of the class are either jobless at graduation or have offers for jobs that will make them 40k-60k a year, and I'm in the NorthEast, so that's not alot of money!!
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: lobadobadingdong
what's an lsat?
it's the test you need to take to apply to law schools
Originally posted by: Gunther
Great thread, I am also considering going into law and as Canoworms asked, is pantent law or more generally ip law saturated?