Can win98 access files on a win2000 drive?

Hooobi

Golden Member
Jan 26, 2001
1,217
0
76
My win2k install disk appears corrupted and so I can't reinstall it on my primary drive so I'm wondering if I can install win98 instead and then retrieve the files off of my secondary drive (which was formatted under win2k) so that I can burn them to CD.
 

shurato

Platinum Member
Sep 24, 2000
2,398
0
76
As long as your win2000 partition wasnt formatted ntfs you should be able to... win98 cant read ntfs, whether your booting from a bootdisk or after you installed it.
 

KBTibbs

Senior member
May 3, 2001
226
0
0
no. yes. well...maybe.

If the Win2000 partition is formatted FAT32, Win98 will be able to read it. But, if the partition is NTFS only Windows NT, 2000, or XP will be able to read it. It couldn't hurt to try I suppose.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Originally posted by: Hooobi
It's NTFS :(
That's one reason why I disagree with the "NTFS is better even for desktops!" viewpoint. Servers, sure. Desktops, it's nice to be able to use a DOS disk or W98 partition to access my W2K files if needed.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Originally posted by: Hooobi
It's NTFS :(
That's one reason why I disagree with the "NTFS is better even for desktops!" viewpoint. Servers, sure. Desktops, it's nice to be able to use a DOS disk or W98 partition to access my W2K files if needed.

This is yet another reason people should start making backups. Dont blame the technology for ignorant/lazy users.
 

c0rv1d43

Senior member
Oct 1, 2001
737
0
0
Not to mention that a cautious user should always have a backup OS setup CD and an ERD (in NT 4.0 or Win2K). Recovering files from a large hard drive using a DOS boot diskette and the attendant workarounds for getting the data off the drive is a lousy method of recoverying data compared to either a) having backups of the data in the first damned place, or b) just repairing the installation using a setup CD.

- Collin
 

Hooobi

Golden Member
Jan 26, 2001
1,217
0
76
geez guys, way to kick me when I'm down...

actually, there's nothing really critical I need to get off the drives, as I do full backups every month or two... it's just mainly an issue of being able to access the 100+gb of stuff that's on there...

Regarding emergency disks, I've never had problems repairing a win2k installation from the emergency repair console of my win2k CD... problem is, my CD is either scratched or somehow otherwise corrupted because it won't install properly...

 

c0rv1d43

Senior member
Oct 1, 2001
737
0
0
Originally posted by: Hooobi
geez guys, way to kick me when I'm down...

I don't think anyone wanted to kick you. I think some of us were kicking each other, just arguing back and forth about the truly questionable suggestion that was made concerning the "superiority" of FAT32 for data recovery purposes. I have never lost data on an NTFS partition. Never. I have lost a couple of hours' worth of data occasionally on FAT32 partitions, and I've seen TONS of other people's data lost on them. Those were people who were counting on their FAT32-partition hard drives and not backing up their data. The only data I've seen lost on NTFS partitions was due to frank hard drive / controller failure. Again, backup to external media is the final level of protection.

actually, there's nothing really critical I need to get off the drives, as I do full backups every month or two... it's just mainly an issue of being able to access the 100+gb of stuff that's on there...

If most of the 100+ gb is replaceable, or at least not a real problem to lose, then it's a moot point as to how you back it up (or don't back it up). I suppose a separate hard drive (on a different machine?) would be sufficient for that type of backup. But if it's important stuff it needs to be backed up to external media, on both rotating (frequently replaced) and permanent media.

Regarding emergency disks, I've never had problems repairing a win2k installation from the emergency repair console of my win2k CD... problem is, my CD is either scratched or somehow otherwise corrupted because it won't install properly...

Yup. Scratches, corruption or loss of boot loaders due to problematic install routines or repair procedures on multi-boot systems, and other such stuff are exactly why you keep a current ERD and make a backup CD of the OS setup CD. It costs next-to-zero in time and effort. Look how much trouble it would have saved you.

I hope things work out for you.

- Collin