Can we get an Image quality review?

[couhonou]

I've been wondering something why hasn't any techsite done a thorough Image Quality comparison between the GTX 400's and the Radeon 5-series?

 

[lsv]

I can't tell the difference in those for any new cards. =\

 

[bryanW1995]

here's one where bfg10k writes about 5000 series cards, though it was written before thermi came out.

http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=12648


here's another one with gtx 2xx series. I believe that gtx 2 and 4 series are similar, though bfg is the one to ask. I'll get him to look at this thread.

http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=3188

 

[BFG10K]

GF100/GF104 IQ is almost identical to the GT200 and earlier, with the exception of decoupled TrAA, coverage samples influencing TrAA, and super-sampling in DX10/DX11.

I’ve finished an outline for an IQ review on my GTX470, but I’m currently waiting for certain tools to be updated for the 256 drivers so I can finish it.

 

[Anarchist420]

nvidia has better IQ hands down. ATi's filtering sucks (harsh mip levels), they use some zrange hack, and their colors don't look as good.

 

[Martimus]

nvidia has better IQ hands down. ATi's filtering sucks (harsh mip levels), they use some zrange hack, and their colors don't look as good.

That is kind of funny, because it used to always be nVidia with the horrible image quality. It is nice to see that they have managed to fix their issues.

 

[Phynaz]

nvidia has better IQ hands down. ATi's filtering sucks (harsh mip levels), they use some zrange hack, and their colors don't look as good.

Link?

 

[Grooveriding]

nvidia has better IQ hands down. ATi's filtering sucks (harsh mip levels), they use some zrange hack, and their colors don't look as good.

Disagree, have used cards from both, most recently from 5870s to 480s. Colours are much better on ATI.